The catch with purchasing a home or a condo in a co-op, planned unit development (PUD), or common interest development (CID) in California, is that you also automatically become a member of a homeowners’ association (HOA) club. The club, while exclusive, is not necessarily the kind of club you would want to be a part of just for the name or the bragging rights. This is because with your membership to an HOA, you automatically give up a lot of control over your own property. Clearly, if you are in the market to spend a lot of money on a new property, you probably want as many freedoms with it as you would expect, therefore, it is crucial you understand the ways that being a member of an HOA can limit those freedoms.
A homeowners’ association is comprised of members who own property within the subdivision. Most HOAs are operated by a board of directors, usually made up of a small group of volunteer homeowners.
All members of the HOA must agree to abide by certain rules and regulations which are outlined in the covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) section of the agreement.
These CC&Rs limit the freedoms of individual homeowners’ by putting executive and decision-making rights into the clutches of the homeowners’ association at large. In doing this, the agreement serves as a legally binding document that allows others within the community to make decisions about what you can and cannot do with your property on your behalf.
Okay, so far, the whole things sounds awful, right? Well, the thing is there is not really much good that comes out of homeowners’ associations for most people: some associations fancy themselves neighborhood officers and enforce every rule with the same zeal that a cop might have for giving someone a ticket on their morning commute to work, whereas others are far more chilled out and do not really bother to interfere with their members’ lives.
As a general rule of thumb, most homeowners’ associations will always want to make decisions that serve to improve the value of the houses in the community. While that may sound like a very noble intention, it often means that the association gets the ability to dictate very constrictive regulations on the entire community living there.
Since these agreements and their CC&Rs that come with them are legally binding, you will absolutely want to be sure that you have read up on the details of the agreement. Otherwise, you might end up purchasing a property where the CC&Rs are incompatible with your lifestyle. For instance, many CC&Rs outright prohibit you from painting your house certain colors, specify which colors of curtains or blind are acceptable if they are visible from the street, and even detail what kinds of front yard landscaping or pruning you can do. Honestly, there is virtually no limit to how weirdly specific the rules in CC&Rs in an HOA can get. Some common examples that they can restrict or regulate include:
As such, it is always in your best interest to read your the provisions outlined in your CC&R's thoroughly and carefully.
Another negative aspect of homeowners’ associations is that once you own property within the community, getting any help or relief from overbearing restrictive CC&Rs is extremely difficult. Most likely, you will have to submit a detailed application with a hefty fee for a variance, ask for your neighbors’ express permissions, and maybe even attend formal hearings and proceedings to see what is decided about your case. The bureaucratic processes only worsen if you want to make any structural changes to your house, like adding a room or building a fence. In those cases, you will most likely have to receive formal permission from the association, in addition to complying with city zoning laws.
The last straw for most prospective buyers is the fact that homeowners’ associations almost always require members to pay fees on a monthly basis, which can feel an awful lot like paying for rent on top of your mortgage.
These fees are to cover costs for ‘common property’ maintenance such as pools, golf courses, gardens, walkways, and other facilities. Sometimes, the fees can run as high as hundreds of extra dollars a month. Worse still, lots of homeowners’ associations give their boards permission to raise the costs by up to 20% per year as well as imposing new taxes and fees into the final cost without even requiring a membership vote.
When a HOA fails to maintain that common areas, misuses HOA funds, the HOA may be in breach of their fiduciary duties of HOA Board Members. An HOA board member is typically only personally liable in these lawsuits if the member breached his or her fiduciary duty to the HOA. Often times in HOA can find themselves liable during homeowners insurance claim disputes amongst neighbors which generally result in a lengthy litigation battle.
If you are worried about any of the restrictions we mentioned earlier, or if you have concerns that homeowners’ association fees may get out of hand, you should definitely refrain from purchasing a property that requires you to become a member of an HOA. Make sure you do your research thoroughly about the exact terms and conditions that the property entails, because most times the sales agents for units within a community will not ever warn you of these restrictions. They do a great job of selling you the property–and a poor job of telling you about the baggage and the bureaucracy the property comes with.
At KAASS LAW, our California homeowner association lawyers believe that your home is a sacred place and running into problems with your HOA and insurance claims can be a frightening and overwhelming experience. Making the move to own instead of renting is a huge stride toward future financial success for anyone, and we want that process to be as rewarding and stress-free as it can be for our clients. We break down the details to you very clearly so you do not fall into a costly trap later and we can also help you fight some of the ridiculously restrictive rules and regulations of some CC&Rs. If you have any questions or concerns surrounding homeowners’ associations and the covenants, conditions and restrictions that they may come with, we highly encourage you to give us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our California homeowner association lawyers today.
The rise of the app-based sharing economy has led to many insurance challenges. States like California have taken steps to protect consumers. From homesharing to ridesharing, the U.S. population is embracing the sharing economy. People frequently rent cars through platforms like Turo or use ridesharing services such as Uber and Lyft.
California Public Utilities Commission Regulating Ridesharing
California was the first state to regulate ridesharing services. It requires companies to obtain a license from the California Public Utilities Commission, provide a minimum of $1 million in insurance, conduct vehicle inspections, and offer driver training programs.
Liability Issues with Rental Sharing Economy Apps
When an accident occurs involving a vehicle rented through an app like Turo, liability issues may arise. California's AB 1871 bill specifically addresses liability for car-sharing. Under this law, Turo is considered the vehicle owner during the rental period. The law also prevents your insurance company from canceling your policy due to participation in car sharing.
Is Turo Liable for Insurance Purposes During the Rental Period?
California civil litigation proceedings help resolve private conflicts between people, businesses, and/or the government in Government Tort Claims actions. Litigation is one of the most fundamental aspects of law. It refers to the formal process of resolving legal disputes by filing or responding to complaints through the public court system.
What most people tend to think of when they think about lawyers and courts is typically not very representative of what actually goes on. The classic Law and Order portrayal of law in Hollywood, albeit very immersive and dramatic, does not give a realistic overview of what the legal process entails, or how one goes about it.
A much more reasoned approach to understanding how the legal process works, would be to simply take a look at the process of taking legal action, or litigation. In any case, the process begins when someone files suit. Typically, the plaintiff begins this process when they file a formal complaint with the clerk of the court. At this point, the defendant must be notified that a lawsuit was filed against them, so as to give them the proper notice before a court date. The defendant must then figure out their strategy to deal with the lawsuit and so usually a lawyer or firm gets hired on to help with legal counsel and representation. Then, the court establishes personal jurisdiction and a location is finalized for the court that will have authority over the complaint.
Cybersecurity has never been as important as it is today for safeguarding crucial information. This includes information that can easily be used to identify and to compromise the personal details of our lives. Everything from bank account and transactional details to personal milestones, memories and life events are all available to access online. All of these trends are natural consequences of our increasing reliance on the internet and online activities. The sheer amount of personal data that can be retrieved online is staggering...which then begs the question: who or what is protecting all of it?
While an easy answer to the question of online security simply does not exist, we can determine the security protocols of many of the online services we use by doing some quick research. The main things to look out for are their terms of use and their privacy policy. These two together are what constitute the core ethos of the company with regards to their users’ privacy and the lengths they are willing to go through to protect it. Outside of that, it’s all about being conscious of what services you use and what information you give up in order to use it. However, despite being careful, there’s no much you can do if the service itself gets breached. In those cases, it’s all about how the company responds to and deals with online attacks.
Turo third-party auto liability insurance is purchased through Turo and includes coverage for renters/guests under a third-party automobile liability insurance policy purchased from Liberty Surplus Lines, a Liberty Mutual Group company Said Liberty Mutual Policy provides guests with insurance coverage while they are driving the rented vehicle during the booked trip. The following covers information regarding Turo's California peer-to-peer car rental insurance coverage.
According to the Turo website, Turo's insurance coverage for bodily injury and property damage to 3rd parties is as follows:
California Penal Code Section 503 defines embezzlement as fraudulent appropriation of property by a person to whom it has been entrusted. To commit a person in the embezzlement the prosecutor must be able to prove each of the following elements:
Embezzlement can only be proved if there is an actual evidence of trust or confidence between two parties. To “entrust” means to give a legal power to access or control the property. When a person abuses a position of trust and take or use a property which doesn’t belong to him his action are considered fraudulent. There must be a clear intent to deprive the property’s true owner of its use. This deprivation does not need to be lasting. Merely preventing the owner of the property from using or enjoying his property even for short period of time is considered enough to satisfy the intent element of embezzlement. Restoring the embezzled property will not protect you from punishment, but restoring property may help to decrease the harshness of the sentence.
Peer-to-peer car rental sharing apps and services, such as Turo or Gertaround which allows you to rent another person’s vehicle. There are a few things to keep in mind when using such service, such as insurance covered and P2P car sharing liability issues.
If you are wondering if your personal auto insurance will cover your auto damage in the event the you rented a car and were involved in an accident you will have to check the language in your own policy. Many auto insurance companies included language which specifically excludes coverage if you’re using a P2P vehicle. While your personal car insurance covers traditional rentals, it may not cover peer-to-peer car sharing.
Often, car sharing companies such as Turn, generally provided basic insurance plans, however they carry very low limits, thus it’s worth spending more to get top-tier plans to increase coverage in the event the renter of your car is involved in an auto accident. Therefore, you will need to purchase the car-sharing company’s auto insurance to be sufficiently covered
California law allows persons to recover damages for intentional fraud as well as negligent misrepresentations if certain elements are sufficiently plead and proved.
There are specific elements that a party is required to prove in order to successfully recover damages suffered due to the fraud or misrepresentation. A false misrepresentation lawyer near you should be able to provide you with legal assistance for your situation.
Fraud is using deceit or dishonest means for the purpose of depriving another of money, property or a legal right.
Intentional Fraud/ Deceit occurs when the defrauder uses deceit or false important facts to convince the victim to rely on the false facts. Then the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed by the deceit.
Promissory Fraud occurs when the defrauded makes a promise that is important to the transaction that he or she never intends to, nor never performs, in order to induce the victim to rely victim rely on the promise. Then the victim must reasonably rely on and be harmed by the false promise. “An action for promissory fraud may lie where a defendant fraudulently induces the plaintiff to enter into a contract.” ( (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 973-974; (1985) 39 Cal.3d 18, 30.)
All of the apps and online services you use track, collect and distribute your usage patterns and demographic information. However, some companies put much more emphasis on protecting the data of their consumers, whereas others go out of their way to collect and analyze as much of their users’ data as they can. The ever-increasing gap between companies’ ethos and philosophy toward user privacy has reached a turning point. On the one hand, you have companies like Apple that have built up a brand and a reputation for standing with their customers by protecting and encrypting their data as much as possible–at times even making that data completely inaccessible to Apple itself. Then again, on the other hand, you have companies like Google that go out of their way to gather as much data and information as possible from their users, without paying nearly as much thought as to how to contain and protect that data from breaches and hacks. As a consumer, these increasingly polarized attitudes and approaches toward the issue of privacy should definitely strike a chord, and at least raise some questions for thought.
California Non-Disclosure Agreements
In the modern, competitive workplace, maintaining an edge over your competitors’ ideas and innovations has never been more important to the success and longevity of your enterprise. For this reason alone, non-disclosure agreements have become ubiquitous and commonplace across many industries. The fear of secrets, designs, and upcoming ideas or trends leaking out is so prevalent that many companies struggle to contain their own in-house secrets and methods from their competitors without subjecting their own workers to intense scrutiny. However, this is where some of the advantages that come with non-disclosure agreements shine through.
Think of it this way: when a business hires a new employee, the very last thing they want out of their new member is for another company to swoop in with a more lucrative offer to steal the employee...especially if the new employee has had some time to learn about the company’s trade secrets and confidential information. Having a key employee or asset leave your company and work for a competitor can be disastrous because of the secret information the worker may have had access to while they worked for you. If they manage to share those secrets with a competitor, then you may very well risk losing your competitive edge in your industry.
The AB 1871 bill makes Turo liable for insurance instead of your personal coverage. Once the $1M insurance limit is exceeded, Turo becomes responsible. Turo must also indemnify you in any civil action, replacing your personal insurance unless the incident results from willful negligence. Turo’s Third-Party Automobile Liability Insurance includes property damage claims and Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist (UIM/UM) coverage.
California Turo Car Rental Accident Lawyer
If you’re involved in a peer-to-peer car rental accident in California, contact our experienced Turo car rental accident lawyer. Our attorneys have extensive experience securing significant settlements from insurance companies known for denying claims. We’ll thoroughly review your case to gather the necessary evidence. To schedule a free consultation, call KAASS LAW at (310) 943-1171 or contact us via our online appointment form.
Bear in mind that most of this process is heavily bureaucratic and involves many back and forth between the two parties. To avoid some of the confusion, both parties must meet and discuss with each other the nature of the case. This is done to determine specific issues, points of disagreement, to broach the possibility of settlement, and to start making plans for discovery and disclosure. In fact, depending on the case, discovery and disclosure can very easily end up taking up a huge chunk of time because during this period, both parties must disclosure to one another the various pieces of information they are planning on submitting and using as evidence in court. If the case ends up having many different pieces of evidence, then the discovery and disclosure period will be very lengthy, and yet also very important too.
This period is one of the few in which both parties must be completely open and honest with one another, and therefore it marks an excellent opportunity for a good lawyer to get enough insight as to how the opposing side is going to approach the conflict. By seeing the evidence that the opposition plans to use against you, you can formulate a general picture of their plan so that you can begin countering it with yours. As such, this step in the legal litigation process is absolutely crucial for both sides.
Once both sides have had their turn to see the other side’s evidence, the court will move to schedule an early pretrial conference. There, at the pretrial conference, both sides meet in a courtroom in front of a judge, who facilitates a discussion of the issues of the case. This discussion is important to have because some cases are not suited to go on trial since there may be a lack of material issue of dispute or disagreement between the parties. Other cases are just simply ambiguous and some clarification is needed for the judge to determine what the key problems are and whether or not those issues can be resolved through trial. As such, the judge will ask questions to both sides so as to clarify the actual points of contention for each party.
After that, the defendant has the ability to file motions and answers, the first of which aims to dismiss or otherwise discredit the plaintiff’s accusations and the latter of which acts as a response to the initial complaint made by the plaintiff. Either way, these motions can be absolutely crucial to the success of the defendant in court because they can make huge strides by eliminating several avenues of argumentation that the plaintiff or prosecutor may use in court. Past this period, both parties once again disclose documentation and the discovery process moves forward; both parties now have another opportunity to file for more motions and finally the court will hold one last pre-trial conference. After all of that has been said and done, the court conducts the trial.
During the trial is when most, if not all, of the action that you see on TV actually takes place. As you can see, there is a lot more to the story that happens leading up to the day of trial and even during the trial the proceedings take place in an organized manner. At the end of the trial, the court decides upon and files its judgment. Once this takes place, post-trial proceedings, such as appeals, can be made. If either party chooses to appeal, they have another opportunity to present their case, which may or may not sway the final decision. Appeals are considered on the basis of briefs or oral arguments which to serve to demonstrate why the judgment that was rendered was unjust or inadequate, as well as to propose another judgment that the court can implement instead.
Finally, the last ruling or verdict is made, which is typically by a jury, and judgment is enforced. This means that whatever the court decides must get carried out and at this point the litigation process finally concludes. This coverage and overview of the litigation process aims to illuminate the various steps, proceedings, and protocols that go into the work that gets put into any given lawsuit case. Folks who work in the legal world all must understand and abide by the legal process and as such litigation is the cornerstone of how our society enforces laws and renders justice. At
KAASS LAW's civil litigation lawyers are well-aware have litigated and tried numerous cases in various areas of law. We believe that going the extra mile to educate and raise awareness will always pay dividends in the end. As such, we are always available to answer and to clarify any questions or concerns our clients may have regarding their case, and it is also why we do pro bono work. If you have any questions concerning a legal matter, feel free to reach out to us at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our experienced litigators today. We will give you the insight, confidence, and security you need to win your case.
As far as how companies must respond to security breaches, there are laws in place which require them to disclose what happened if the compromised information can jeopardize clients’ personal information and private matters. Specifically, the California data security breach notification law was enacted in 2002 and has been in effect ever since and it requires that companies notify California residents whose unencrypted information was acquired by any unauthorized person. The law is extensive in that it still requires that you be notified even if the information was leaked or hacked. This means that even if a company is not one hundred percent sure if your information was breached, they do still have to notify you so long as there is a reasonable doubt.
California’s civil law code 1798.82, while originally enacted only in California, most states have since followed suit by enacting similar laws. In fact, the California data security breach notification law was quite novel and progressive for its time as it deals with issues of cybersecurity and online privacy at a time when those areas were nowhere near as well-developed and intensive as they are today. The intent of this law is simply to ensure that the public remains aware of any successful cybersecurity attacks and to keep companies accountable for their security protocols and measures.
Since this groundbreaking law came into effective, there have been many more laws like it added in an effort to stay ahead of the security curve. The importance of strong, online encryption really cannot be understated and it was laws like these that jump started the movement.
At KAASS LAW, we believe your personal information is yours, only. If you have any doubts as to whether or not your personal data was breached, or if you have any questions about what can be done about it, then we encourage you to give us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our California privacy attorneys today. We can walk you through your options and we will always stand by our clients and their security.
According to the Turo website, Turo's insurance uninsured or underinsured Motorist (“UM/UIM") insurance coverage is as follows:
Protection plans made available by Turo also address the renters liability for any damage to the booked vehicle which may occur during the booked trip.
The person who rents out a car using Turo is responsible to return the booked vehicle on time and in the same condition as when they first received it. The renter is held financially responsible for all physical damage to the booked vehicle, as well as related costs, if any. If, for instance, there is physical damage to the booked vehicle during the period of the booked trip, the renter will be legally liable for the costs of repair, plus related costs, if any. If there is physical damage to the rented vehicle and the cost of repair exceeds 75% of the actual cash value of the vehicle, the renter will be legally liable for the actual cash value of the booked vehicle, plus related costs, minus the salvage value, if any.
If you were involved in an peer-to-peer sharing auto accident in California we invite you to hire our dedicated Los Angeles Turo accident and insurance lawyer today. Our skilled accident attorneys leverage their considerable experience into obtaining significant settlements from insurance companies who are known for being reluctant to pay out on claims. You can rely on our experienced lawyer to carefully analyze the facts of your case to prove the facts necessary. To schedule a free consultation with one of our peer-to-peer sharing app lawyers, call Kaass law today at (310) 943-1171 or send us an email through our online appointment form.
Embezzlement most commonly occurs in cases in connection with business, because most cases involve an employee/employer relationship. That’s why embezzlement is also called employee theft or employee fraud. Typically embezzlement involves theft which can be both grand and petty theft. However, embezzlement can also be connected to other crimes like forgery, burglary, receiving stolen property.
Defendant had a good faith belief to entitlement: Under California Penal Code 503 you might be exonerated if you had a reasonable belief that you had a right to the property you took. You have to show that:
Lack of criminal intent: Embezzlement, like all theft crimes, requires “specific intent,” so if you took property accidentally or then this defense can apply.
False accusation:False accusations are mostly common in embezzlement cases, because the injured party is almost always someone who had a preexisting business or personal relationship with the defendant.
Since California embezzlement is categorized as a theft crime, you will be faces penalties either charged under grand theft or petty theft depending on the type and value of the embezzled property. When the value of stolen property is less than $950 embezzlement is considered a form of petty theft and when the value is $950 or above embezzlement is a form of grand theft.
You will face the penalties for grand theft embezzlement if the:
In most cases grand theft embezzlement is a wobbler offense in California, thus it may be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony. Cases involving firearms always carry felony penalties.
Penalties for misdemeanor grand theft embezzlement in California include:
Penalties for felony grand theft embezzlement in California include:
California Penal Code provides sentence enhancement in case grand theft embezzlement includes particularly large sums of money.
In California law petty theft embezzlement is a misdemeanor offense, punishable by:
Hire the most dedicated California embezzlement defense lawyer to the legal services you require! Our attorneys at KAASS LAW are highly dedicated to help our clients in every way possible. You can rely on our experienced lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles, California, to carefully analyze the facts of your case to prove the facts necessary. We back all of our clients and we invite you to give us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our experienced Glendale criminal battery attorney today. Get in touch with us at KAASS LAW, 815 E Colorado St #220, Glendale, CA 91205, (310) 943-1171at any time!
If you were involved in an auto accident using a Turo peer-to-peer rental car, you will be charged a deductible, typically from $1,000 to $3,000 if the company needs to file a claim.
Participation in any peer-to-peer sharing apps comes with risks, especially in your renting your car out. The most obvious risks is potential damages to your vehicle, fighting with the insurance companies to receive a fair market value for your car in the event. Further, if you don’t notify your insurance company that you’re renting out your car and or your participation in a P2P car-sharing you may potentially be at risk of having your policy canceled. Thus, its best to check with your insurer before placing your car for rent on a car-sharing app.
If you rent your car through a PTP car sharing App such as Turo, generally your car will not be covered unless you have a commercial auto insurance police. Personal auto insurance policies are now being written to specifically exclude peer car-sharing apps from coverage. While, companies such as Uber or Lyft provide liability insurance coverage to accommodate peer-to-peer car sharing it is best you check if the P2P car sharing company you are participating offers such coverage. Turo, works a bit different than Uber and Lyft liability insurance claims.
Turo's Primary liability insurance coverage covers the car owner up to $1,000,000; protection for physical damage to your car is provided without deductible for the Premium and Standard host protection plans, and with a $3,000 deductible for the Basic plan.
Under Turo's premium and standard liability insurance plans, car owners receive the actual cash value of their car or up to $125,000, in the even the vehicle is deemed as totaled. Coverage is not available for hosts who are not utilizing a Turo protection plan. More over, primary liability coverage up to $1,000,000; no protection for physical damage to your car.
Per Turos Premium Plan haves insurance liability coverage up to to $1,000,000. Physical damage to the car covered up to the actual cash value of the car. No deductible for the supplemental liability coverage. Turo's premium liability insurance insurance is secondary to any other insurance the renter may have, however as mentioned, often times your own insurance will exclude coverage for car-sharing services. Lastly, once you’ve exhausted your own insurance for physical damage, your out-of-pocket expense is limited to $500.
Liability coverage for owners who rent their car out using Turo are covered up to a combined single limit of $1,000,000 for liability. Coverage includes personal liability for the renter, third-party liability for passengers and other affected parties, and third-party property damage arising from a car accident. Comprehensive and collision coverage The collision coverage provided protects the owner's vehicle in the event of an accident. Liability insurance coverage applies for the duration of each rental, from start to finish, and includes liability, collision and comprehensive.
If you were involved in an peer-to-peer sharing auto accident in California we invite you to hire our dedicated Los Angeles Peer-to-peer accident lawyers today. Our skilled accident attorneys leverage their considerable experience into obtaining significant settlements from insurance companies who are known for being reluctant to pay out on claims. You can rely on our experienced lawyer to carefully analyze the facts of your case to prove the facts necessary.
To schedule a free consultation with one of our peer-to-peer sharing app lawyers, call Kaass law today at (310) 943-1171 or send us an email through our online appointment form.
KAASS LAW, 815 E Colorado St #220, Glendale, CA 91205, (310) 943-1171
Concealment Fraud occurs when there is a fiduciary or other relationship between the parties where there is a duty of full disclosure. The concealing person, with an intention to deceive, does not disclose important facts that the concealing person knows but the victim does not and could not know. Further, the victim reasonably relied on and was harmed by the concealment.
Constructive Fraud or Negligent Misrepresentation occurs when the perpetrator misrepresents to the victim that an important false fact is true. However, the defrauder may have honestly believed that the false representation is true. Yet, the defrauder had no reasonable grounds for believing the representation was true when he or she made it; and he or she intends that victim rely on the representation. The victim must reasonably rely on and be harmed by the false representation.
In proving intentional fraud in California it requires all of the following elements be proved:
“An action for promissory fraud may lie where a defendant fraudulently induces the plaintiff to enter into a contract.” (Engalla v. Permanente Medical Group, Inc. (1997) 15 Cal.4th 951, 973-974; Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 18, 30.)
Negligent misrepresentation often times referred to as constructive fraud requires that all of the following elements be proved:
California Fraud and Misrepresentation Laws Video
Our misrepresentation and fraud attorney in Los Angeles has experience in complex fraud and misrepresentation cases. If you are an individual victimized by a corporation's commercial deception we welcome you to call to us at (310) 943-1171. Our proven litigators and investigators at KAASS Law will help you with your corporate fraud case.
One of the questions that might come to mind is whether or not you actually have any say as to how often or what kinds of data companies can collect from you. Unfortunately, the answer isn’t as cut and dry as a yes or no. The reality is that privacy laws vary immensely depending on the industry, type of service, and location of the company providing the app you are using. As such, the level of accountability and transparency that businesses must meet are quite different from one another. What this means in real world situations is that a customer cannot have universal demands or expectations from businesses and companies regarding their privacy. While this is hugely inconvenient, there is a silver lining in the form of your own decision making. Though you alone cannot control the laws governing the ins and outs of these companies, you can make an educated decision as to which services you choose to use and to what extent you wish to use them.
For example, upon creating an account for Gmail, Twitter, Facebook iCloud and the like, you will typically be presented with a series of options regarding data and diagnostics. While most folks usually just take the easy route and skip ahead using the default settings, it is definitely worth your time to stick around and explore a bit. By taking a second look at what you are agreeing to, you may notice a couple of things that genuinely surprise you. It’s amazing how much these companies can get away with gathering from your usage and many people probably would not be as comfortable using those services, if they understood the extent of the access these companies have regarding your private data. By taking a couple of minutes and reading up on your options while signing up, you can actually limit several major pieces of information that these companies have access to, such as browsing and crash data, frequency of use, and general statistics about your areas of interest and demographics.
As for the things you cannot control, there is little else you can do about that outside of finding another company that provides a similar service that values your privacy more than its data collection. Some things you can’t easily limit access to include anything the company exempts or says it needs from you in order to provide their service in their privacy policy and anything else that they can gather ‘publicly’ from your browsing or usage. Certain bits of information are personal but not identifiable, meaning that they cannot see who the data is from nor any identifying characteristics of the user. While it can definitely be scary to think of all the data these companies have collected from you, you should know that usually the data is only used internally. What this means is the company that collected your data while you used their app or service will only use that data to improve the quality and performance of their site or product. The upside of this is your data will not be pawned off to other companies, but the downside is that less and less businesses give you that level of privacy as an option.
The classic example of a company that is more than willing to sell and barter away their gathered information is Facebook. To be clear, Facebook is a company which has millions of active users and their database of users is quite diverse, covering many different spheres and communities. As such one would think that Facebook would understand and value their users’ privacy by respecting and protecting it...but no. Facebook instead takes the much more lowly route of simply hoarding as much user data as possible and then selling this data to third party companies for a massive markup and profit. Perhaps the most insulting aspect of this shady business practice is that it happens almost entirely in total secrecy, without any notice or heads up given to any of the user base. As a result of their recklessness, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has had to appear before Congress to explain the company’s actions and decision making processes, especially in light of recent hacks and security breaks which have exposed millions of users’ profiles, photos, friend lists, and other private data without their permission.
In light of these now public scandals, most consumers have reached a point where they just want to enjoy the services they need without a constant fear of being tracked and the worry of having their collected information leaked publicly. For your own privacy and security, we recommend to do some searching around to see if the particular apps and services you use have strong options for limiting the amount of data that can be gathered from your activity, as well as checking up on the overall reputation of that company as it is relevant to user privacy. Even a simple internet search can bring up any major scandals, side deals, security breaches, and common privacy concerns regarding any given company. By checking out some articles like this one here, you can learn so much more about how your data and privacy are treated on the internet and what you can do about it on your end.
Our goal here is to empower you with some of the basics regarding your rights to privacy and how data collection works on different platforms. At KAASS LAW, we stand with our clients and we believe that privacy is a right, not a privilege. If you have any other questions or concerns regarding your online privacy and how you can take control of it, don’t hesitate to get in touch with us. We invite you to reach out to us with any problems or cases you may have by giving us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to one of our lawyers today.
On that note, non-disclosure agreements can help business and prevent this whole situation from ever arising by simply preventing your workers from disclosing or even talking about company secrets and confidential information. However, generic non-disclosure agreements are of little use to most businesses, because each company has its own niche and thus, its own secret information. As such, the best non-disclosure agreements are the ones which are specifically tailored to a company’s needs by an attentive business lawyer. That way, you can be sure that the non-disclosure agreement touches upon all of the relevant points for your company.
As far as non-disclosure agreements go, it’s always very important to be particular with what you outline in the contract. Tailoring the agreement to your needs is key to an enforceable and successful agreement that can hold up well in court. So, before making your employee sign your non-disclosure agreement, you’ll want to take a closer look at the contents of the agreement first. Make sure that your agreement mentions:
We Can Help
At KAASS LAW, our business law lawyers believe in our clients’ abilities to innovate within their industries. We stand by our clients by helping them draft up specific, tailored non-disclosure agreements to maximize the benefits that it can offer. Ensuring our clients’ commercial success is key for us and we demonstrate this by being with you every step of the way. Even in the event that information gets illegally leaked, we are here to make sure our clients get their due compensation in court. We invite you to give us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our California business attorneys today to see how we can help protect the most valuable assets of your business.
KAASS LAW, 815 E Colorado St #220, Glendale, CA 91205, (310) 943-1171