Employee injuries are unfortunately common in workplaces across California. Whether it's a slip on a wet floor, a fall from scaffolding, or an injury caused by malfunctioning equipment, these incidents can leave workers dealing with physical pain, emotional stress, and financial uncertainty. Understanding your legal rights after an employee injury is critical to protecting your health, your income, and your future.
At KAASS LAW, our experienced attorneys help injured workers explore their legal options and pursue the compensation they deserve. If you’ve been hurt at work, don’t wait—knowing what steps to take can make all the difference.
The most important action you can take after any workplace injury is to report it immediately to your supervisor or manager. Even if the injury seems minor at first, symptoms can develop or worsen over time. By reporting right away, you start a paper trail that can support a future claim.
After notifying your employer, seek medical attention. Depending on the severity of your injury, you may need emergency care or a follow-up appointment. Make sure to keep records of all medical visits, diagnoses, prescriptions, and treatments.
In our work with injured workers throughout Los Angeles and beyond, we've seen a wide variety of incidents leading to injury claims. Some of the most common include:
Whether you work in an office, warehouse, or on a film set, your employer is responsible for maintaining a safe working environment.
California law generally requires employers to carry workers’ compensation insurance, which provides coverage for medical expenses and partial wage replacement. However, there are limitations. Workers' compensation typically doesn’t cover non-economic damages like pain and suffering or emotional distress.
That’s where third-party claims come in. If someone other than your employer—such as a subcontractor, property owner, or equipment manufacturer—played a role in your injury, you may be able to file a personal injury lawsuit in addition to your workers' comp claim.
Learn more about your options in our guide to third-party work injury claims in California.
To build a strong legal claim, you must prove that another party was negligent and that their actions (or failure to act) directly led to your injury. Common examples include:
Collecting evidence is key. This may include photos from the scene, eyewitness statements, accident reports, surveillance footage, and your medical records. An attorney can help gather and preserve this evidence while you focus on recovery.
Navigating the legal process after a workplace injury can be overwhelming, especially when you’re already dealing with physical recovery and medical bills. At KAASS LAW, our Glendale personal injury attorneys understand how to handle complex employee injury cases, including those involving multiple liable parties.
Our legal team can help you:
If you have questions about your legal rights, don't hesitate to contact our team for a free consultation.
While both workers’ compensation and personal injury lawsuits provide financial relief, they differ in several important ways:
AspectWorkers' CompPersonal Injury Lawsuit
Fault Required?
No
Yes – must prove negligence
Types of Compensation
Medical bills, partial wages
Medical, lost wages, pain & suffering
Suing Employer?
Not allowed in most cases
May sue a third party (not the employer)
Timeline for Filing
Within 30 days of injury (notify employer)
Within 2 years of the incident
Knowing which path is appropriate can save you time and help maximize your compensation.
For more general information about workplace safety standards and employee rights, you can visit the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) website.
Every injury case is unique, and acting quickly can be crucial. Waiting too long to report your injury or explore your legal options could impact your ability to file a claim. Our attorneys at KAASS LAW are here to provide the legal guidance you need.
We’ve helped numerous employees in California obtain compensation beyond what workers’ compensation offers, especially in cases involving third-party negligence.
If you or someone you love has suffered an employee injury, contact our office today at 310.943.1171 or visit our page on California workplace injury claims for more information.
When exiting a parking space, drivers must yield right of way to passing vehicles and pedestrians. If they collide with a pedestrian or another vehicle while backing out, they will almost always be held accountable. There may be exceptions, such as when the oncoming vehicle was speeding or the pedestrian was particularly careless.
Vehicles that have been parked and are pulling out of a parking space do not have the right of way. They must yield to vehicles moving through the parking lot. They must also yield to pedestrians. However, parking lots are notorious for having a lot of activity. They are also densely packed with parked cars, resulting in poor visibility and numerous blind spots. This can make seeing oncoming traffic through the other parked cars difficult. Nonetheless, drivers backing out of a parking spot have a legal obligation to do so safely. They are usually liable if they hit another car or a pedestrian. They can be made to compensate the parking lot accident victim. There are, however, exceptions.
Apartments are a place for students, adults, and children to live in close quarters. This is what makes them perfect living spaces for people who need to be near the center of a city or town. These apartments often come with many safety hazards that can lead to injury. Have you been hurt in an apartment-related accident? Tenants and visitors to apartment complexes sustain frequent injuries as a result of a landlord's failure to correct or repair certain dangerous conditions, such as flooding, shattered stairs, or collapsing decks. If you were injured in an apartment building, you are entitled to compensation. Personal injury lawsuits against landlords or apartment buildings for injuries on rental property are common. Premises liability lawsuits can be filed by our accident attorneys. Compensation may be obtainable through:
Accidents in apartments are fairly common and can cause a wide range of injuries. Apartments are a convenient way to live. There are some risks associated with this living situation, however. Knowing the most common injuries sustained by those living in an apartment is important so that you can prevent them or know what to do if they happen to you. Typical injuries include:
Fraudulent acts are committed by a relative or caregiver of a property owner. In many cases, they involve family disputes. There have been reports of children stealing their parents' property, people attempting to co-opt inheritances from their siblings, and people attempting to defraud their spouses. To transfer ownership, the scammers create fake documents, including fraudulent or incorrect notarizations. Unlike in many other parts of the country, California's laws and real estate practices make it very easy to fraudulently transfer property title. When a document is recorded, it becomes part of the official title chain, and the new owner, legitimate or not, can obtain loans or even sell the property. The statute of limitations is relatively short (three years for forgery and two years for fraud) and has frequently expired by the time the victim realizes his home is no longer in his name.
Fraud transfers include signed documents that allow a creditor to seize the debtor's assets or force the debtor to pay the debt from their income. Some judgment debtors decide to hide or dispose of their assets after learning that judgment collection methods will allow the creditor to seize their assets. Debtors, for example, may transfer their assets. This could be to relatives, friends, or legal entities, simply place the assets under false names, or burden their assets with fictitious debts. Debtors may engage in such schemes, the courts and legislature have long recognized. As a result, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act provides remedies for creditors who face this issue. Making a mistake during a notarization can have serious financial and legal ramifications for California Notaries, and breaking the law on purpose can result in even harsher penalties. This guide will assist Notaries in becoming acquainted with the Golden State's Notary laws and penalties for misconduct.
Invasion of privacy laws are both criminal and civil in California. They involve false light claims and cases involving the public disclosure of private facts. The laws are similar in that a person does something that invades another's privacy. While the specific activities in criminal and civil proceedings differ in terms of definitions and how they are proven, they are both intrusions on a person's personal affairs.
The California Privacy Act is a wiretapping law. It prohibits the recording of confidential conversations without the consent of all participants. This includes telephone conversations. Victims of illegal wiretapping may be subject to legal damages. Breaking the law is a crime. Violators may face:
During a telephone conversation, both parties must agree to record. Which makes California a "bilaterally agreed" state.
Examples of invasion of privacy are everywhere. We've all heard the story of a man whose ex-boyfriend or girlfriend shared risky photos without their consent. Social media platforms are regularly used as a launching pad for personal attacks. Many of us have probably even become the target of extremely harmful or violent "gossip" about someone's highly personal information. These are all examples of invasion of privacy, and they are all flagrant violations of people's right to maintain the confidentiality of their personal affairs.
Every boater should be aware of the dangers of operating a vessel while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (BUI). Every state makes it illegal to operate a boat while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. A federal law against BUI is also enforced by the Coast Guard. This legislation applies to all boats (from canoes and rowboats to the largest ships), as well as foreign vessels operating in US waterways and US vessels operating on the high seas.
Boating under the influence are actions, which are criminalized under section 655 of the Harbors Navigation Code of California. Particularly, the above-mentioned section states that it is a crime to commit the following actions:
California BUI law criminalizes the following actions:
A minors' compromise and release hearing is required by California law if a child under the age of eighteen is injured and receives a monetary settlement from the at-fault party. This means that a guardian must be appointed by the court unless the child is legally emancipated, a judge must approve the settlement for your injured child, and the settlement funds must generally be deposited into a blocked account in any FDIC-insured bank, trust company, savings and loan associate, or similar financial institution located in the state of California, until the child is eighteen years of age. The settlement funds can also be invested in a vehicle like an insurance annuity contract (single-premium deferred annuity). Alternatively, you can have a portion of the funds deposited in a bank and a portion of the funds deposited in an investment vehicle. Please see other articles on this website for more information, or your child's injury lawyer can explain which method is best for depositing settlement funds.
According to California Probate Code Sections 2504,90 3500,91 3600,92 and California Code of Civil Procedure Section 372.93, an enforceable settlement of a can only be consummated with California court approval. The whole point of a court-supervised settlement for injured minors in California is to: Appoint a guardian to assist the minor child in monitoring his or her settlement funds.
In California, victims of police misconduct, brutality, or excessive force can file a lawsuit. Typically, the lawsuit is based on civil rights violations. The victim may be awarded monetary damages in the lawsuit. It can also seek an injunction to prevent future wrongdoing. Also, it's possible that the officer will face criminal charges as a result of this.
The term "police misconduct" refers to police officers who engage in illegal or inappropriate behavior. Discrimination, obstruction of justice, and other forms of police misconduct are examples of misconduct. Police misconduct is the illegal behavior of police officers, which takes various forms such as:
It's natural to feel stress and confusion of what to do after receiving an injury in a car accident or other type of accident. You may be coping with financial hardship in addition to the physical and emotional effects of your injury. Many people have lost income as a result of their inability to work, while also facing mounting medical expenditures. Therefore, if someone else's negligence caused the accident, you may be able to hold them liable for the financial losses.
It's a legal principle that's been around for centuries. Its goal is to safeguard persons who was received injures in car accidents. If a person is hurt, they are able to get all of the money they need as soon as possible. If a third party compensates said person, it should have no bearing on what the plaintiff pays. The rule performs two functions. The evidential function is the first one. Simply put, it is a rule that implicates the rules of evidence and ensures that the defendant will not be able to bring up third-party payments made to the plaintiff. The substantive function is the second. This pertains to a person's civil rights and obligations, as well as the victim's right to recover the damages. In other words, just because a victim has received compensation from a third party does not indicate that it will lessen their losses.
It is highly dangerous work to deal with asbestos and underground tank works, which can cause big property damages and serious health injuries if not done correctly. A person (including a licensed contractor) who performs asbestos-related work without certification, or who installs or removes an underground storage tank without certification, is in violation of California's Business and Professions Code 7028.1 BPC.
Asbestos is a high heat resistant fibrous silicate mineral. An underground tank is "a tank and or any underground piping which is connected to the tank, and at least 90 percent of the combined volume of which is underground." Such tanks are usually used to store petroleum and other similar materials. California Business and Professional Code, with its section 7028.1, makes it a crime for a contractor to perform the following actions:
In a case involving an auto accident, disregarding certain driving regulations can serve as proof of negligence. The finding of negligence may significantly impact the assessment of responsibility for the incident. If the driver or pedestrian who was hit was acting inappropriately, their share of the blame may be greater than that of the driver pulling out of the parking spot. Their carelessness can manifest itself in a variety of ways, including:
The person hit by the car pulling out may have contributed to the accident in these cases. If they hire a car accident lawyer to file a personal injury lawsuit against the driver who pulled out, shared fault rules, such as comparative negligence, may reduce or eliminate their compensation.
Usually, both parties are at fault when two vehicles back out simultaneously in different directions and collide. If acceleration and impact were striking at high speeds, it is possible for both drivers to get injuries. However, injuries may vary. In any case, it is crucial to contact your attorney and find out if you are able to receive compensation for your loss. Those in parking spaces must yield to those in the main lanes, meaning the driver coming from the traffic flow has the right of way. In other words, the driver in the main lane has priority over individuals exiting parking spaces. On the traffic flow, alternatively, this hierarchy is based. When pulling out of a parking space, parked automobiles yield to moving vehicles. Moving cars in the main lane of traffic must yield to stationary vehicles during the time of traffic. All cars, however, have to stop for pedestrians. Parking lots are always one-way for pedestrians. They can still cause an accident, though, by acting inappropriately. In parking lots, there is a standard regulation for the speed restriction. This aims to give drivers ample time to brake and avoid an accident in a parking lot. Certain parking lots have their own right-of-way guidelines. These must be clearly visible on street signs or painted on the pavement. These might, for instance, lower the speed limit or change who gets the right of way. Parking lots can be especially dangerous for children and pedestrians. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, thousands of pedestrians are injured each year due to driver inattention and poor visibility in areas like parking lots.
Parking lot collisions happen frequently and can be incredibly serious. A tendency to drive while distracted in a parking lot is a major contributing factor to the large number of these accidents. Driving with any distraction can lead to serious or even fatal injuries, especially to vulnerable victims. Many victims in parking lot accidents are children. Because of their short height, even an attentive driver backing up from his or her parking spot is often unable to see young kids. Additionally, children frequently run through parking lots, making it difficult for drivers to predict their location. The family of the victim may bring a wrongful death claim if there has been a tragic parking lot collision involving a vehicle or a pedestrian. In order to obtain compensation from the party at fault if you were injured in a busy parking lot, you might think about creating an attorney-client relationship with a personal injury lawyer. If you have been involved in a collision in a parking lot, call Kaass Law at 310.943.1171.
It should be noted that the elderly are especially vulnerable to injury. They are more likely to obtain greater damages. If you don't want to experience these types of injuries, there are many precautions you can take. The following are some of the most common apartment accidents that can result in injuries:
In personal injury accident cases, common defendants include landlords, property owners, and property management firms. It is important to note that injury lawyers frequently file an apartment injury lawsuit under a state's premises liability laws. Property owners and occupants have a duty of care under these laws:
If a landlord or property owner breaches this duty, you will most likely prevail in a premises liability claim.
Apartment living comes with its own set of safety challenges, but there are steps you can take to reduce the risk of injury. Regularly inspect your apartment for hazards like loose floorboards, broken stairs, or malfunctioning lighting. Installing safety features like grab bars in bathrooms, non-slip mats in the kitchen, and securing rugs can prevent falls. Additionally, ensure that smoke detectors are working and fire exits are clearly marked. Taking proactive measures can help you avoid costly and painful accidents.
If you’ve injured yourself in an apartment complex, knowing what steps to take immediately can make all the difference in your case. Start by seeking medical attention, even if the injury seems minor. Document the accident scene by taking photos of hazardous conditions, such as broken steps or faulty railings. Report the injury to the property management and landlord, and keep records of your communication. Lastly, contact a personal injury attorney to help you navigate the legal process and ensure you receive proper compensation for your injuries.
Landlords must maintain a safe environment for their tenants. They are required by law to ensure the property is free from hazardous conditions that could lead to injuries. This responsibility includes performing regular maintenance checks, repairing broken fixtures, and ensuring common areas are safe. If a landlord fails to meet these responsibilities, they may become liable for injuries sustained by tenants or visitors. If you suffer an injury due to a landlord’s negligence, you may qualify for compensation through a premises liability lawsuit.
Every year, people living in apartments report hundreds of injuries. This is a concerning statistic that should be addressed to ensure that you do not suffer a similar injury. If you have suffered a serious injury, an injury attorney can assist you in managing your ongoing medical care. Give our office a call if you have been injured in an apartment-related accident at 310.943.1171.
If a Notary commits an infraction, the penalties under California law are divided into four categories:
It is critical to understand that misconduct can result in multiple penalties for a Notary. For example, if a Notary is found negligent for failing to properly complete and seal an acknowledgment on a real estate document, the Secretary of State may impose a civil penalty as well as suspend or revoke the Notary's commission. Furthermore, if the Notary's error resulted in a financial loss for the signer, the signer could sue the Notary to recover any damages incurred as a result of the faulty notarization. Intentionally violating state Notary laws ("willful misconduct") carries significantly harsher penalties than unintentional violations ("negligence").
Notary misconduct can be avoided by the following steps:
Property title fraud can have serious consequences for homeowners in California. To prevent fraud, regularly review your property records and monitor any changes in your title. Be cautious of suspicious activities, like receiving unfamiliar loan offers or unexpected legal notices. If you suspect fraud, act quickly by contacting your title company and a real estate attorney. The sooner you identify fraudulent transfers, the better your chances of stopping further damage. Keeping track of any changes and maintaining clear communication with your legal team can help protect your assets from fraudulent transfers.
If you discover that someone has fraudulently transferred your property title, take immediate action. Start by contacting the county recorder's office to verify the transfer and obtain copies of all relevant documents. Notify your mortgage lender and any financial institutions involved to prevent further unauthorized transactions. Next, file a fraud report with local law enforcement and seek the guidance of an attorney specializing in real estate fraud. Legal remedies may include reversing the fraudulent transfer, recovering assets, and holding the responsible parties accountable. Be proactive in protecting your property to minimize further harm.
Notarization plays a vital role in ensuring the authenticity and legality of real estate documents. Proper notarization prevents fraudulent activity by verifying the identity of the signer and confirming that they willingly entered into the agreement. Ensure that the notary follows all California laws, including the proper completion of notarial certificates and maintaining accurate records. Inaccurate or improper notarization can lead to costly legal disputes or even title fraud. Always choose a reputable notary and ensure they comply with all requirements to avoid the consequences of fraud or misconduct in your transactions.
If you are in need of an attorney, feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
Typically, only living people can sue for invasion of privacy, which requires proof that public disclosure of a private fact has taken place. To prove this, it is necessary to establish five elements:
Public disclosure of information includes bringing information to the attention of the general public or a large group of people. A private fact is a detail of your life that is usually not open to others, such as your finances, sexual activity, or your health. When disclosure violates commonly held norms of decency, it is offensive to the typical individual. The disclosure that does not cause legitimate public concern is a disclosure that has no social value but deeply violates a person's privacy. Finally, demonstrating a reckless lie requires demonstrating that the defendant knew how offensive it would be to reveal private facts but did so anyway.
You may be hesitant to disclose a breach of your privacy due to feelings of vulnerability or even humiliation. However, remember that invasion of privacy is a felony that, like any other crime, must be prosecuted. Privacy invasions can range from innocuous to deadly, but no matter how serious they are, reporting them to the appropriate authorities as soon as possible is the best course of action. The consequences of defamation can be as serious as personal injury. As a result you deserve justice for the pain and embarrassment you are experiencing or did in the past.
If you or someone you know is subject to privacy invasion and have further issues, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. If you have any questions please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
If a BUI suspect fails a chemical breath test or a blood test within three hours of driving the boat, California law presumes that they have an illegal BAC level. Defendants, on the other hand, can challenge this presumption in court. Evidence that the breathalyzer was faulty or that the blood samples were tainted, for example, might invalidate the chemical test results.
A person is considered to be under the influence, if, as a result of drinking and/or consuming alcohol, taking drugs, his/her mental or physical abilities are so impaired that he/she is no longer able to drive a vehicle (vessel) with a caution of a sober person, using ordinary care, under similar circumstances. In other words, the influence of alcohol and drugs on your organism shall be so essential that it shall cause you:
For instance, suppose you drank some beer while operating a boat, but you are a professional driver and the drink has no effect on the boat's performance. They won't find you guilty of violating California's Harbor and Navigation Code § 655 (b). However, the case will be different if you are a new driver of a vessel, and the percentage of alcohol in your blood can easily lead to operating the boat worse than usual. The prosecution considers a number of variables when determining whether you are under the influence of alcohol or drugs. These factors are:
Under this subsection, it is illegal to:
This subsection differs from the one previously discussed. In case your abilities to drive your boat were not under effect of the alcohol concentration in your blood. However, the test is revealing that it was 0.08 percent or higher, it can be illegal.
The actions, considered to be offenses under this section, are:
The level of caused bodily injury does not play a role in accusing the person of a violation of this subsection. To understand when you can be convicted for violation of this subsection, let's consider the following example. If you operate your boat faster than the speed limit in the region while under the influence of alcohol or drugs. You may be found guilty of violating the relevant provision if your friend falls and fractures her hand as a result of your actions. You can try to prove that you were not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or their combination while committing the unlawful act or neglecting the duty. The above mentioned can help to mitigate the penalties.
The violations are variable thus it is essential to find a professional attorney to assist you in defense against the penalties. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
In California, the court process is the best way to approve and monitor a bodily injury settlement for a minor. After the court approved their child’s injury settlement and deposited the funds into a bank account, parents approached me to petition the judge for an early release of part of the funds that didn’t directly benefit the minor. Some parents forget that California’s court process exists to protect the child’s interests because the settlement funds belong to the child. Courts will allow an early release of funds, but they closely scrutinize such requests and require that the money benefit the minor directly.
Courts supervise minor settlements in California to ensure that children receive full protection under the law. Judges appoint guardians, evaluate the fairness of settlement terms, and oversee fund distribution. This process ensures that parents, insurance companies, or other parties do not misuse the minor’s funds. The courts take an active role in protecting a child’s financial interests until they turn eighteen. Without this safeguard, many minors could lose access to money that was rightfully theirs. The legal system prioritizes the child’s well-being above all else and aims to prevent financial exploitation or irresponsible use of settlement proceeds.
At a minor’s compromise hearing, the court reviews all settlement documents and hears from the guardian and attorneys involved. The judge examines the proposed settlement amount, attorney fees, and any medical liens or expenses. If the judge finds the settlement fair and in the best interest of the child, they approve it. Once approved, the funds move into a blocked account or annuity. Parents and guardians must present clear justification for any early withdrawal requests. Judges often ask questions to ensure that the settlement truly benefits the minor. They also check that the agreement complies with California Probate Code and Civil Procedure requirements.
Parents must gather key documents and understand the legal steps before attending a minor’s settlement hearing. They should consult with a personal injury attorney to file the proper paperwork, including a petition for approval and financial documentation. Courts expect parents or guardians to fully explain how they will use and safeguard the funds. Parents should also discuss blocked account options or annuity investments with financial advisors. Courts want to see responsible planning to protect the minor’s future. Preparing thoroughly not only helps ensure a smooth court process but also builds trust with the judge, increasing the likelihood of approval.
For more information on California’s court procedures for minor settlements, visit the California Courts Self-Help Center on Minor's Compromise.
If the monetary settlement is less than $5,000, California Probate Code Sections 3611(d), 94, and 340195 have routinely allowed custodial parents to manage the settlement funds directly on behalf of their minor children, avoiding the need for court approval. In fact, all of California's major insurance carriers routinely waive minors' compromise and release hearings when the settlement amount to the injured child is less than $5,000.
Judges do not require court approval for settlements under $5,000. Judges can choose to place the minor child's funds in a blocked account with court-approved withdrawals. They may also order direct payment to the custodial parent(s).
Are you looking for an attorney to help you with your case? Look no further, Kaass Law will be able to provide you great experience, knowledge and satisfaction. Fell free to call our office at 310.943.1171.
These actions result in violations of the civil rights of the plaintiff, guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, such as the right of the freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, right to privacy, etc.
The respondents are police officers, sheriffs, other officers, representing law enforcement agencies. A bright example of police brutality is the use of excessive force by the police. This misconduct usually happens when the police try to arrest someone. As to the law, the police can use force during an arrest, however, only such force is reasonably necessary for the arrest. Taking into account the fact that the victim can run away from the police, can resist, etc. On a case-by-case basis, courts consider whether the use of force was reasonable and proportionate to the arrest, or whether the use of force surpasses the necessary and desirable threshold.
Though we live in a developed society of the 21st century, racial profiling can still be an issue. Everyone enjoys equal protection under the law and racial profiling cannot serve as a ground to suspect people of committing a crime. A person can file a lawsuit against the police officer if he proves that the unlawful detention, searches or seizures, or other actions conducted by the police officer were based on racial profiling.
An arrest is when someone's freedom of movement is intentionally restricted. The person is forced to stay or go somewhere against his will as a result of the deprivation. A false arrest occurs when a peace officer has no legal authority to make an arrest. False arrests are a violation of the victim's right to due process under the Fourth Amendment. False imprisonments are another name for them. They may occur when:
Without a warrant, some victims are detained. In these situations, the officer must demonstrate that he or she had probable cause. This necessitates demonstrating that there was reasonable cause to believe the person arrested had committed one of the following crimes:
Other arrests are made on the basis of a warrant. Even if the warrant was invalid, these could still be false arrests.
If the police officer found evidence during the misconduct (for example, during unlawful seizures and searches), the plaintiff can ask the court to exclude such evidence from the case. Other types of claims are possible to file against the police officer. The plaintiff can file a section 1983 claim or Biven’s lawsuit against the police.
Section 1983 claims can be filed for violations done under color of law, which means, conducted acts are legitimized by and are related to the role of the officer. Such lawsuits can be filed to receive such remedies as compensation for caused monetary damages or injunction by the court. Biven's claim is quite similar to the section 1983 lawsuit. However, it can be filed against such federal actors as DEA (Drug Enforcement Agency) FBI officers.
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
The collateral source rule states that any compensation received by an accident victim from a source other than the defendant in a personal injury case cannot be deducted from the defendant's final award. There are essentially two things that result from the collateral source rule, which are as follows:
An example of those evidence includes:
Yes, there are two exceptions to the collateral source rule, which are as follows:
Yes, subrogation clauses inserted in policy contracts of insurance companies may be an issue for purposes of the collateral source rule. The reason why is because a subrogation clause can help an insurance company recover the costs of the benefits it has paid the plaintiff after an accident.
Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.
According to the text of the law, it does not matter whether you are a licensed or a non-licensed contractor; you shall be certified to conduct the works mentioned above, as your license does not automatically enable you to conduct asbestos-related or underground tank works.
The above-mentioned section is a misdemeanor. In case you commit the violation for the first time, it can result in:
If you violate the relevant section for the second or subsequent time, this can lead to:
In accordance with the aforementioned sanctions, the judge has the authority to grant probation to the defendant.
Under the California Business and Professional Code, among the related offenses is contracting without a license under section 7028 of the Code. The relevant section makes it a crime for the person to:
The offense is a misdemeanor offense and has these charges:
There are several defenses you can raise to protect yourself from further penalties under the relevant section. Examples of such defenses will be if you were not a contractor while performing the forbidden actions. This means you have not entered into a contract to perform these activities. This defense may work as section 7028.1 applies only to contractors. It can also be if you have not committed the actions knowingly. For example, you touched upon asbestos in the middle of the performance of other types of work, you performed actions not understanding that you are currently dealing with the mentioned material. You can also use types of such defenses as proving that the police applied overbearing measures to coerce you into confession, with the help of which the judge may exclude the confession from other evidence. It is also possible to try to prove that you are falsely accused of violating section 7208.1 of the California Business and Professional Code.
When dealing with hazardous materials such as asbestos and underground storage tanks, it’s critical to understand the legal requirements in California. The certification ensures that workers have the knowledge and skills necessary to handle these dangerous substances safely, preventing health risks and property damage. Certification also guarantees compliance with state laws, which aim to protect workers, property owners, and the environment. Without proper certification, individuals may face legal penalties, including fines or jail time. Thus, obtaining proper certification is not just a legal necessity but also an ethical responsibility to ensure safety.
To avoid violations under Section 7028.1, contractors must prioritize staying informed about certification requirements for asbestos and underground tank work. Ensure all employees involved in such projects are properly certified and meet the necessary safety standards. Contractors should regularly review the latest regulations and training opportunities to maintain compliance. Additionally, it’s crucial to avoid unlicensed work, as operating outside of these boundaries can lead to severe legal consequences. A proactive approach can help prevent penalties, fines, and potential jail time while ensuring safety and legal integrity in all projects.
Note that it is essential to have a good defense to mitigate or even dismiss a charge against you. Contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.