Under California Vehicle Code § 21801 (a) The driver of a vehicle intending to turn to the left or to complete a U-turn . . . shall yield the right-of-way to all vehicles approaching from the opposite direction which are close enough to constitute a hazard at any time during the turning movement, and shall continue to yield the right-of-way to the approaching vehicles until the left turn or U-turn can be made with reasonable safety. According to California Civil Jury Instructions (CACI) a “hazard” exists if: "any approaching vehicle is so near or is approaching so fast that a reasonably careful person would realize that there is a danger of a collision [or accident]." In other words, the driver who is attempting to make a left turn must ensure that no oncoming vehicles are close enough to be a hazard before he or she proceeds across each lane the driver of a vehicle will yield the right of way, until the turn may be made with reasonable safety.
Before we dive into determining fault in a left turn motorcycle collision, it is important to understand the term "Negligence", which is a term used to characterize conduct that creates an unreasonable risk of harm to others. In order to prove negligence you must prove:
In theory both a rider and the motorist can potentially be partially responsible for causing the left turn collision. For instance under the comparative negligence theory a party may contribute to an act of negligence or be comparatively negligent for his or her own injuries. However, it is important to remember that recovery for damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault associated with that matter. For instance, if you were found 20% at fault for causing the accident, your settlement and or judgement will be reduced by 20% of the entire dollar amount settled or awarded.
There are several problems with this. First off, even if there is a traffic collision report, stating that the driver of the car was at fault, the traffic collision report is hearsay. As a matter of fact, it cannot get admitted as evidence to prove the dynamics of the motorcycle accident. Also, the insurance company also doesn’t have to consider this as proof of fault. The insurance company attorneys not having to consider the traffic accident report, will begin placing blame on the innocent victim. They might claim, the rider wasn’t being inattentive. Or they may say you weren’t riding at a safe speed during the collision. Then again, they might claim the rider should have yielded. The Endless Insurance Company Excuses. They can also claim the motorcyclist was not wearing bright enough clothing or anything else. Hence they may argue the motorcyclist at fault instead of the insured auto driver. So besides being worried about getting your bike fixed and custom motorcycle parts, now you have to PROVE it was not your fault.
Negligence determines who was at fault and their degree of the blame. Both a rider and the motorist can be partially responsible. The biker can still recover money. Some of these accidents take place due to the motorcyclist passing a larger vehicle in the same travel lane. In fact, that could have obscured him from an oncoming vehicle turning left. The other motorist usually fails to have enough reaction time to complete the left turn safely. This makes the car into a wall of steel, ejecting the rider from their bike. The rider may have been reckless. So starting a motorcycle lawsuit is not always the answer. A unique factor to consider remains that most insurance companies refuse to pay money after a rider gets smacked down.
We provide 24/7 motorcycle accident hot line available for victims involved in motorcycle accidents. Speak to a Los Angeles motorcycle accident attorney today. Our motorcycle accident lawyers charge our clients' zero upfront legal fees. You pay nothing until and unless we successfully secure a settlement or judgement.
Experienced and inexperienced riders must be ready to deal with every roadside contingency in as little as microseconds. Motorcycle accidents normally occur blue and are totally unpredictable. Only sturdy boots, helmets and other gear reduce harm. But when coupled with training and muscle memory it can prevent harm.
We provide 24/7 motorcycle accident hotline available for victims involved in motorcycle accidents. Speak to a Los Angeles motorcycle accident attorney today. Our attorneys speak English, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and French.
Location: 701 North Brand Blvd. Suite 100 Glendale, CA 91203 Telephone: (310) 943-1171 Email: [email protected]
KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office. KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
California law allows consumers to bring bad faith tort action against their insurers for breaching the duty of good faith when refusing without proper cause to compensate its insured for a loss cover by the policy. Generally, every insurance policy has an implied obligation of good faith and fair dealing that neither the insurance company nor the insured will do anything to injure the right of the other party to receive the benefits of the agreement.
Insurance bad faith means to breach the implied obligation of good faith and fair dealing, an insurance company must, unreasonably or without proper cause, act or fail to act in a manner that deprives the insured of the benefits of the policy. It is not a mere failure to exercise reasonable care. However, it is not necessary for the insurer to intend to deprive the insured of the benefits of the policy.
Generally, the term bad faith for insurance purposes means an insurance company:
When a motorcyclist is injured due to another driver's negligence, the rider is entitled to seek compensation for not only their property damage and injuries, but are also entitled to seek loss of income, past and future medical expenses, pain, suffering, and other related expenses from the other drivers insurance company.
When a motorcyclist or motorcyclists passenger is killed in an motorcycle accident that was result of another parties fault or negligence the surviving heirs or relatives of the deceased party is entitled to pursue compensation for wrongful death. A civil lawsuit may be brought against the person that caused the death to recover monies.
There are a few things that should be noted that California law allows for two different types of lawsuits a and a suit brought based on a . Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 377.60, a cause of of a person caused by the or may be asserted by any of the following persons or by the decedent’s personal representative on their behalf:
Under Penal Code 17(b) PC, felony reductions to misdemeanors are available if defendants
In California, you must satisfy both elements to reduce your felony conviction to a misdemeanor. Serving time in state prison after a conviction for a "wobbler" offense makes you ineligible for relief under Penal Code 17(b).
(a)A felony is a crime which is punishable with death or by imprisonment in the state prison. Every other crime or public offense is a misdemeanor except those offenses that are classified as infractions. (b)When a crime is punishable, in the discretion of the court, by imprisonment in the state prison or by fine or imprisonment in the county jail, it is a misdemeanor for all purposes under the following circumstances: (1)After a judgment imposing a punishment other than imprisonment in the state prison. (2)When the court, upon committing the defendant to the Youth Authority, designates the offense to be a misdemeanor. (3)When the court grants probation to a defendant without imposition of sentence and at the time of granting probation, or on application of the defendant or probation officer thereafter, the court declares the offense to be a misdemeanor. (4)The prosecuting attorney files a complaint in a misdemeanor court, stating the offense is a misdemeanor. If the defendant objects during arraignment or plea, the attorney amends the complaint to charge the felony, and the case proceeds on the felony charge. (5) If the magistrate decides the offense is a misdemeanor before the preliminary examination or before filing an order under Section 872, the court will treat the case as a misdemeanor complaint. (c) When the court commits a defendant to the Youth Authority for a crime punishable by imprisonment in the state prison or by fine or imprisonment in the county jail, the court deems the offense a misdemeanor for all purposes upon the defendant's discharge from the Youth Authority. (d)A violation of any code section listed in Section 19.8 is an infraction subject to the procedures described in Sections 19.6 and 19.7 when: (1)The prosecutor files a complaint charging the offense as an infraction unless the defendant, at the time he or she is arraigned, after being informed of his or her rights, elects to have the case proceed as a misdemeanor, or; (2)The defendant consents, and the court determines that the offense is an infraction. The case then proceeds as if the defendant had been arraigned on an infraction complaint. (e)This section does not permit a judge to relieve a defendant of the duty to register as a sex offender under Section 290 if the charge requires registration and the trier of fact finds the defendant guilty.
An alien applying for asylum can also apply for withholding of removal at the same time. Withholding of removal is an alternative to the asylum for a foreigner who fears to return to his home country. However, it should be noted that the grant of the withholding of removal does not result in the same benefits arising from the grant of asylum.
Withholding of removal is a remedy available to an alien who cannot go back to his home country because of a threat to his life or freedom. Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, an alien cannot be removed to a country if the alien’s life or freedom would be threatened in that country because of the alien’s race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion. INA § 214(b)(3)(A).
An alien is eligible for withholding of removal if he is able to establish that his life or freedom would be threatened because of one of the statutory grounds if he is removed to his home country. The alien will meet his burden of proof if he is able to show that it is more likely than not that his life or freedom would be threatened if he is removed to his home country. The “more likely than not” standard for withholding of removal is more difficult to meet than the standard for showing fear of persecution for asylum applicants.
Prior to preparing the H-1B petition for a foreign employee, US employers shall determine whether the specific occupation falls under the H-1B category or not. Currently, the H-1B category covers only foreign employees who come to US to perform services in a specialty occupation or are models of distinguished merit and ability.
A specialty occupation is an occupation that requires theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge, and attainment of a bachelor's or higher degree in the specific specialty as a minimum for entry into the occupation. To qualify as a specialty occupation, the position must meet one of the following criteria: (1) A baccalaureate or higher degree or its equivalent is normally the minimum requirement for entry into the particular position; (2) The degree requirement is common to the industry in parallel positions among similar organizations or, in the alternative, an employer may show that its particular position is so complex or unique that it can be performed only by an individual with a degree; (3) The employer normally requires a degree or its equivalent for the position; or (4) The nature of the specific duties are so specialized and complex that knowledge required to perform the duties is usually associated with the attainment of a baccalaureate or higher degree. INA § 214.2(h)(4)(iii)(A). Some occupations clearly fall under the specialty occupation for H-1B purposes, and employers do not have to do much to show that the offered position is in a specialty occupation. The list of these occupations includes, but is not limited to, lawyers, accountants, engineers, architects, psychologists, scientists, and financial analysts. For these occupations, employers do not need to submit extensive evidence to show that the position is in a specialty occupation. For other occupations, which do not clearly fall under the specialty occupation category, employers will have to demonstrate that the position is in a specialty occupation. Employers can demonstrate that the position is in a specialty occupation by showing that it meets one of the criteria specified in the Immigration and Nationality Act. The adjudicators at USCIS rely on the Department of Labor’s Occupational Outlook Handbook to determine whether the position is in a specialty occupation or not. This handbook specifies the duties and requirements for different positions, including the requirements for entry into the specific occupation. The Handbook can serve as a comprehensive guide for employers to determine whether the specific position will qualify as a specialty occupation or not. Employers shall keep in mind that the H-1B category does not cover all the occupations, but only specialty occupations. Hence, employers shall determine whether the specific position is in a specialty occupation, and only after that shall start working on the H-1B petition. If the position is not in a specialty occupation the H-1B petition will not be successful, and employers should think about alternatives.
Did you know you can become a permanent United States resident by investing money into a US business?
If you are interested in becoming a US permanent resident via EB-5, below are a few things you should now about EB-5 investment program:
The immigrant investor must invest or be actively in the process of investing $1.000.000.
The qualifying amount of investment is $500.000 for targeted employment areas which are rural areas and areas with high unemployment rate. A mere intent to invest or prospective investment arrangements without present commitment will not suffice.
The investment must take the form of contribution of capital that has been placed at risk for the purpose of generating income.
The USCIS rules define capital to include cash, cash equivalents, equipment, inventory, other tangible property, and indebtedness secured by assets owned by the investor. The required investment cannot be made in the form of a loan to the company. The foreign investor also has to show that the invested capital was obtained through lawful means.
According to the United States Department of Transportation, nearly 80 percent of motorcycle accidents are either fatal or cause injuries. Understanding of your rights cannot hurt as much as getting into one. California motorcycle accident laws are very similar to those in other states. There are some differences that are specific to California.
California is the only state that permits lane splitting, “squeezing” in past slow or creeping traffic. California bikers must wear helmets at all times and must carry liability insurance at all times. California bikers must possess a Class M1 or M2 license and pass a skills test. Many times even the most skilled motorcyclist are involved in accident, i.e., motorcycle-auto or motorcycle-truck accidents. There are various causes for motorcycle accident such as:
It is possible that your insurance company uses or has used Colossus in the past to determine how much should they pay you for your injury.
Wait, so you mean a computer decides the value of my injuries? Yes, a computer program computes the value of human injuries. Sadly, many times, these settlement offers are unreasonably low. If you received an unreasonable settlement offer for your damages, you can file a bad faith claim against your insurance company with regards to the use of Colossus. If you believe that you may have a bad faith claim against your insurance company give KAASS LAW a call for a free consultation with a personal injury attorney or accident attorney. Our skilled Glendale personal injury lawyers, insurance litigation attorneys, economists, and negotiators work together to secure fair settlements.
If you are an officer, president, or owner of California corporations and have been served with legal papers for a lawsuit or pending legal proceedings, it is crucial to hire a business lawyer to represent you in court. This is not just a recommendation—it’s the law. According to Paradise v. Nowlin (1948) 86 C.A.2d 897 and Code of Civil Procedure § 116.540(b), California law prohibits anyone other than a licensed California attorney from representing a corporation or LLC in court proceedings, except in small claims cases.
California law treats corporations as separate legal entities from their owners, officers, and directors. This means that even if you are the CEO of a corporation, you cannot represent the corporation in court unless you are a licensed attorney in California. Courts recognize corporations as distinct "persons" under the law and require them to have representation by a licensed professional. Attempting to represent your corporation without an attorney risks case dismissal or sanctions.
Both first and third party can bring suit for insurance bad faith.
First party claims are made between its policyholder or insured and the insurance company. These type of claims are contractual by nature and are contingent on the language of the insurance policy. For the insurer to fulfill its obligation not to impair the right of the insured to receive the benefits of the agreement, it again must give at least as much consideration to the latter’s interests as it does to its own.” (Egan v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 809, 818—819 [169 Cal.Rptr. 691, 620 P.2d 141].)
Third party insurance claim is made by a party that is not a named policyholder or insured. The most common type of third party insurance claim would be a liability claim i.e, you were rear-ended up by another driver and filed a claim with his/her insurance company.
California Insurance Code §790.3 underlines what insurance companies are prohibited from doing:
Insured must show that the insurer has:
The actionable withholding of benefits may consist of the denial of benefits due; paying less than due; and/or unreasonably delaying payments due.” (Major v. Western Home Ins. Co. (2009) 169 Cal.App.4th 1197, 1209 [87 Cal.Rptr.3d 556], internal citations omitted.)
If an insurance company is successfully found to have acted in bad faith, they may be liable to pay for:
[video width="1280" height="720" mp4="https://kaass.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/output_HD72010.mp4"][/video]
If you believe that your insurance company may be acting in bad faith, speak to a Los Angeles insurance attorney for a free consultation. Call our office at (310) 943-1171, our attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and Italian.
Location: 701 North Brand Blvd. Suite 100 Glendale, CA 91203 Telephone: (310) 943-1171 Email: [email protected]
KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office. KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
(a) The decedent’s surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and issue of deceased children, or, if there is no surviving issue of the decedent, the persons, including the surviving spouse or domestic partner, who would be entitled to the property of the decedent by intestate succession.
(b) Whether or not qualified under subdivision (a), if they were dependent on the decedent, the putative spouse, children of the putative spouse, stepchildren, or parents. As used in this subdivision, “putative spouse” means the surviving spouse of a void or voidable marriage who is found by the court to have believed in good faith that the marriage to the decedent was valid…”
Minors can also bring a cause of action for wrongful death, IF the minor(s)
Damages for wrongful death include:
We provide 24/7 motorcycle accident hot line available for victims involved in motorcycle accidents. Speak to a Los Angeles motorcycle accident attorney and find out if you qualify as a relative under California law. Our motorcycle accident lawyers charge our clients' zero upfront legal fees. That’s right – you pay nothing until and unless we make a recovery. Our attorneys speak English, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and French.
KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office.
KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
The chance vary from case to case. Generally the court considered a variety of factors when deciding whether to grant a PC 17(b) felony reduction motion. For instance
Speak to a experienced Glendale criminal defense attorney and find out how you can reduce a felony to a misdemeanor under Penal Code 17(b) PC. Our criminal defense attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and Italian.
However, if the grant of asylum is always discretionary, the immigration judge must grant withholding of removal if the applicant meets the “more likely than not” standard. The credible testimony of the applicant may be sufficient to meet his burden of proof. If the applicant is able to show past persecution in his home country there will be a presumption that the applicant’s life or freedom will be threatened if the applicant is removed to that country.
The application for asylum also constitutes an application for withholding of removal, and the alien does not have to submit a separate application for that purpose. However, it should be noted that in contrast to asylum, the withholding of removal may be granted only by the immigration judge. Furthermore, the withholding of removal may be granted even though the alien has filed the application one year after his arrival to the United States. Withholding of removal is not available to an alien if:
To sum up, withholding of removal is an option for aliens fearing to return to their home country if the alien is not eligible for asylum. Although the grant of withholding of removal does not result in permanent resident status an alien can legally stay and work in the United States without the fear of being removed to his home country.
Give us a call, our attorneys at KAASS Law speak various languages including English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, Hebrew, Farsi, and Arabic.
Do you need more specific information? A Glendale immigration lawyer at KAASS LAW can provide you with any sort of legal assistance you may need. Give us a call, our attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, Hebrew, Farsi, and Arabic.
The qualifying investment must be in a new commercial enterprise.
An enterprise established after November 29, 1990 is considered a new enterprise even if the investor did not participate in its establishment. When a person makes investment in a business established on or before November 29, 1990 the investment will qualify for E-B5 purposes if the investor establishes one of the following: (1) the investment will result in a substantial change in the business; or (2) the business will be restructured or reorganized.
The investor must be engaged in the management of the company where he invests.
This can be done either through managerial control or through policy formulation. This requirement can be satisfied by becoming a corporate officer or being a member of the board of directors. Maintaining a purely passive role towards the investment cannot satisfy the requirement of USCIS rules.
The enterprise must benefit the US economy by creating full-time jobs for at least 10 qualifying employees.
There is an exception to this rule for troubled businesses where the investment does not have to create 10 new jobs but the investor has to show that the number of existing employees is or will be maintained at no less than the pre-investment level for at least two years.
There is an annual limit of 10000 E-B5 visas per year. Until now the annual E-B5 cap has never been reached.
The investor is initially granted conditional residence for two years.
Prior to the expiration of two years the investor must file a petition requesting removal of the conditional basis of the residence. The investor must show that he still meets the conditions for participation in the program.
Do you need help deciding on what steps to take next? A Glendale immigration lawyer at KAASS LAW can help you out with any sort of legal assistance you require.
It is important for you to protect your legal rights when involved in a motorcycle accident. Never sign a document that is presented to you by the opposing insurance company without having an experienced California motorcycle accident lawyer review it for you first.
Many times, insurance adjusters will offer very low settlement offers. Other times the driver will deny fault and attempt to force the motorcyclist to admit fault. It is important that you consult with an motorcycle accident attorney to help preserve your rights. Call KAASS LAW and schedule you with a free consultation with an experience motorcycle accident attorney.
Our Los Angeles motorcycle accident attorneys represent riders in Glendale, Los Angeles, Burbank, Woodland Hills, North Hollywood, San Fernando Valley, and the surrounding cities.
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Rule 23 requires the following: (1) the class is so numerous that joiner of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and; (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. To certify a class under Rule 23(b)(3), questions of law or fact common to the members of the class must predominate over any questions affecting only individual members.”
Failing to hire an attorney to represent your corporation in court can lead to serious legal and financial consequences. Improperly appearing in court on behalf of your corporation without legal representation can delay or dismiss your case, or result in a default judgment for the other party. A default judgment means the opposing party could win the case without the court ever hearing your defense, leaving your corporation liable for damages, penalties, or other legal consequences. In addition to court-imposed penalties, failing to secure representation can result in missed opportunities to negotiate or settle disputes out of court. Experienced business lawyers often possess the strategic insight and negotiation skills to shorten the legal process or even prevent cases from going to trial. This could save your corporation significant time, money, and reputational harm.
A qualified business attorney guides you through complex court procedures, ensures you meet all deadlines, and protects your corporation's rights. Once served with a summons and complaint, your corporation typically has 30 days to file an answer with the court. Missing this deadline can result in a default judgment, leaving your corporation with no legal recourse. Moreover, business lawyers evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of your case and develop strategies tailored to your specific situation. Whether it's negotiating settlements, filing motions to dismiss, or representing your corporation in a full trial, having an experienced legal team by your side is invaluable. In many cases, having a business defense attorney involved early can lead to quicker, more favorable outcomes. Some attorneys may be able to negotiate settlements that avoid lengthy court proceedings altogether. Even if litigation is inevitable, a skilled attorney can work to expedite the process. Thus, reduce costs, and minimize the impact on your business.
One of the common concerns for corporations facing lawsuits is the cost of hiring an attorney. However, business defense doesn’t have to break the bank. Many law firms, including ours, offer various fee structures to accommodate the financial constraints of small and medium-sized businesses. These fee arrangements can include flat fees, hybrid fee agreements, traditional hourly rates, discounted fees, and capped fees. At KAASS LAW, we understand that the legal system can be both intimidating and costly. That’s why we strive to provide affordable and transparent legal services that fit your needs. Our goal is to offer high-quality legal representation while ensuring that our clients feel comfortable with the financial aspect of hiring an attorney.
Our attorneys are licensed to practice law in California. They have years of experience handling business litigation, corporate disputes, and defense cases. Whether your corporation is facing a breach of contract claim or other business-related litigation, our team is prepared to represent your corporation with professionalism and dedication. We have a deep understanding of California corporate law, and we take pride in defending businesses across various industries.
If your California corporation is facing a lawsuit, don’t wait to get legal help. Schedule a consultation with one of our experienced business law attorneys today. Remember, your corporation’s legal interests matter, and with KAASS LAW, you’re in capable hands. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help your business.
Our attorneys at KAASS LAW are authorized to practice law in California.