Under California Penal Code Section 203 PC mayhem is defined as the act of maliciously an illegally depriving person of a member of his body; disabling, or rendering useless a member of his body; disabling or cutting his tongue; putting out his eye; slitting his nose, ear or lip.
Under California Penal Code Section 205 aggravated mayhem is defined as intentional causing another person a permanent disfigurement or disability, or depriving him of a limb, organ or member.
California’s Criminal Jury Instructions No. 801 indicates the following additional stipulations on how a person can be found guilty of mayhem:
To convict a defendant of aggravated mayhem, the prosecutor must establish the following elements:
In aggravated mayhem case the prosecution must prove that the defendant had the specific intent to disfigure or dismember or a person. For proving an ordinary mayhem, the prosecutor only needs to prove that the defendant committed an act maliciously and that resulted in disfigurement or dismemberment but the defendant didn’t have intent to disfigure or dismember that person.
Maliciously
Under California Penal Code 203 action acting maliciously means committing an illegal act with intent to annoy or injure someone else
Permanent Disfigurement
According to California mayhem law, a disfiguring injury can be considered permanent even if it can be repaired by medical procedures.
In California law both types of mayhem are considered felonies
Penalties for California Penal Code Section 203 Simple Mayhem include:
If the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that one of the below mentioned facts about the victim was true he will receive 1 or 2 year sentence enhancement:
Penalties for California Penal Code Section 205 aggravated mayhem include:
In some mayhem or aggravated cases a probation sentence can be available and can include some actual jail time (not prison), work release or house arrest along with other probation terms.
Both mayhem and aggravated mayhem are considered violent and serious crimes under California Three Strikes Sentencing Law. The defendant will be convicted of a strike offense and suffer additional punishments such as:
Under California Penal Code Section 647(i), also known as the “peeping Tom” law, it is illegal to peek into a door or window on someone else’s private property without the consent of the owner for observing persons who are inside.
The prosecutor must establish the following elements for convicting the defendant in the offense of peeking while loitering:
Under California Penal Code 647(i) any building which is used as a residence can be considered an inhabited structure. It is not important whether someone is inside at the time of peeking or not, a person can be charged with peeking while loitering even if no one is at the property.
Penal Code 647(i) doesn’t require specific intent, and it is not important why a person decided to peek into a door or window on someone else’s private property. So a person can be convicted even if he entered the property without intent to loiter or peek.
Pursuant to California Penal Code Section 246.3(a) a person who willfully discharges a firearm in a grossly negligent manner which could cause injury or death is guilty of a public offense.
To convict the defendant in negligent discharge of a firearm the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, the following elements:
A person shot the firearm intentionally when he pulled the trigger and knew that the firearm was loaded. In case the gun went off completely by accident and a person reasonable believed that the firearm was not loaded it cannot be a negligent discharge.
Gross negligence is more than an ordinary negligence, it means acting so recklessly that any reasonable person can realize that the act is likely to produce great bodily injury or even death. Gross negligence shows a conscious disrespect and indifference regarding the rights and safety of other people. If a person was shooting the weapon in a place where no one was around then he won’t be guilty under Penal Code Section 246.3. Gross negligence happens when a person was shooting the weapon in an area where many people lived and there was a huge chance that his act could possibly cause injury or death.
According to California Penal Code Section 401 it is prohibited to intentionally aid, advice, or encourage another person to commit suicide.
Prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that a defendant is guilty of advising or encouraging a suicide,
“Aiding, advising or encouraging a suicide” means the following:
Even if a person survived the suicide attempt you can still be charged of assisting in suicide as a California attempt crime.
If the defendant helps another person to kill himself he will be guilty under Penal Code Section 401. In case a person asked the defendant to kill him and the defendant carry out that act, then his action will be considered murder, voluntary manslaughter, or attempted murder.
California Penal Code Section 332, gaming fraud or gambling fraud is obtaining another person’s money or property through use of any game, device, sleight of hand, pretensions to fortune telling, trick or any instrument. Gaming or gambling fraud falls under and is considered as theft crime in California.
The California Penal Code, under section 332 establishes the elements that the prosecution must prove to a conviction someone of this crime, the main requirements are the following:
Prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt for convicting a person of fraudulent gaming:
California Penal Code 135 makes it is illegal to willfully and knowingly destroy or conceal any form of evidence that is to be used in a trial or government investigation.
Destroying evidence is prohibited in both civil and criminal cases, including contract dispute litigation or divorce. As noted above this charge applies to evidence which is used in trial or government investigation.
In order for a defendant to be convicted of Penal Code 135 PC destroying or concealing evidence the prosecutor must be able to prove the following elements:
California Penal Code Section 261 defines the crime of "rape" as sexual intercourse that is nonconsensual, because it’s achieved by means of threat, force or fraud threats. The following facts must be established in order to prove that the defendant is guilty of rape:
Sexual intercourse for rape purposes is any penetration regardless of how slight it’s. The sexual intercourse can be either against the person's will, or without that person's consent. In the case of rape intercourse is defined very broadly. Even if the defendant initiated sexual act with someone against their will and after that regretted and terminated the act that still considers as rape.
Under California Vandalism Penal Code Section 594(a) it is prohibited to maliciously deface, damage, or destroy someone else's property.
In order to prove the commitment of vandalism, a prosecutor must prove the following elements:
California Penal Code Section 594 applies both to public and personal property that you own jointly with someone else. So you are not allowed to damage, destroy or deface public property, property owned by another individual or even property that you own jointly with another person.
There are many types of vandalism in California, but the most common are: graffiti (any unauthorized drawing or writing on property with any kind of tool), slashing tires or damaging car paint, damaging mailboxes, breaking windows, damaging telephone wires or other public works equipment.
California Penal Code Sections 451 and 452 address the crime of arson. It is illegal to willfully, maliciously or recklessly burn a property, forest, a piece of land or a structure, or to assist another in committing the same act. A person can also be charged with arson if he set fire at own property in an attempt to commit insurance fraud.
The prosecutor must prove the following element to charge a person under California Penal Code Section 451 “malicious arson”
The prosecutor must prove the following element to charge a person under California Penal Code Section 451 “reckless arson”
According California Penal Code Section 647(a) it is prohibited to engage or solicit another person to engage in lewd or dissolute conduct in any public place or in a place open to the public or exposed to the public view.
To prove that the defendant is guilty of engaging in lewd conduct, a prosecutor must prove following elements:
Defendant had a reason to be on property
In case the defendant had a lawful reason to be on property (working as contractor or was a meter reader or surveyor), he can’t be found guilty under Penal Code Section 647(i).
Defendant was not on a private property
As an essential element of this offense defendant must be on a private property. It is not unlawful to look through the window or a door of an inhabited structure while standing or being on public property or your own property.
Defendant entered an uninhabited building or structure
In case the defendant was peeked into an uninhabited structure or former inhabited dwelling he should not face a peeking while loitering conviction.
Under California Penal Code Section 647(i) unlawful peeking is a misdemeanor offence and the penalties are the following:
The penalties for second or subsequent offense or a first time offense in case the person being viewed is a minor are the following:
Depending on the case circumstances and the defendant’s criminal history he can be sentenced to misdemeanor probation instead of the jail time. Judge may impose different conditions on that probation, such as periodic court appearances, paying restitution to the victim or staying away from the property and the victim, not committing this offense anywhere else. In case the defendant has two or more prior felony convictions, a prior felony conviction during which he was armed or a prior conviction for a serious felony he can’t be entitled to informal probation.
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 657(i) charges or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
A firearm is any device which is used as a weapon from which a projective is discharged. A BB gun is any instrument that expels a projectile through the force of gas pressure, air pressure or spring action. Penalties for negligent firing BB gun are lesser than for negligent discharge of a firearm.
Common defenses to Penal Code 246.3(a) including the following:
In using the self defense claim in penal code 246.3(a) charges the defendant may claim self-defense in situations where:
In case the defendant discharged a firearm in the above mentioned circumstances he cannot be found guilty of this crime. However, defendant must have ceased from using force once the threat of danger had passed.
Under California Penal Code Section 246.3 firing a gun intentionally is a key element of the crime. Defendant must have known that the gun was loaded for being convicted in negligent discharge of a firearm.
Prosecution must be able to prove that defendant’s discharge of a firearm posed an actual danger to people. In case no one could have been foreseeable and reasonably hurt then the defendant cannot be found guilty of negligent discharge.
In California law negligent discharge is considered a wobbler and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, based on the case circumstances the defendant's criminal history. In case the negligent discharge is done with a BB device it is always a misdemeanor.
Penalties for Misdemeanor Penal Code 246.3(a) conviction include the following:
Penalties for Felony Penal Code 246.3(a) conviction include the following:
In case the defendant discharge a firearm in association with a known gang, for the benefit of the gang or at the direction of the gang with the specific intent of assisting the gang in any way he will face additional two, three or four years in prison.
Under California's “Three Strikes” law felony negligent discharge is classified as a “serious felony”. In case a conviction for Penal Code Section 246.3 as a felony is later followed by a charge for another felony, the defendant will face punishment twice the normal sentence for the second offense. A conviction for third felony will result in a sentence of twenty-five years to life in a state prison.
A negligent discharge of a firearm is considered a deportable crime and can lead to severe consequences for non-citizens. In case a defendant is a non-citizen and is convicted of this crime, he can be deported or be subject to inadmissibility grounds.
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 246.3(a) charges or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
California’s End of Life Option Act allows a person who is diagnosed with a terminal disease to ask for an aid-in-dying drug from his physician. For receiving an approval the physician must submit detailed information to the California Department of Public Health.
The patient must meet the following conditions for getting help to commit a suicide under California’s End of Life Option Act:
If the all above mentioned requirement are met the physicians cannot be prosecuted under California Penal Code Section 401 for assisting a terminally ill patient’s suicide.
Common defenses to California Penal Code 401 Aiding, Advising or Encouraging Suicide include
Defendant didn’t have a deliberate intent to help in a suicide
In case the defendant unintentionally aided or encouraged a person to commit suicide without intent, he can’t be found guilty of this crime.
The person didn’t have intent to commit a suicide
Maybe the person who attempted or committed suicide didn’t have actual intent to kill himself. The attempt or the death may have been an accident.
Under California law aiding, advising or encouraging a suicide is considered a felony. The punishment depends on whether the person survived the suicide or not. Defendant can receive lighter punishment in case the person has survived.
The possible penalties under Penal Code 401 Aiding, Advising or Encouraging Suicide” include:
Our Glendale criminal defense lawyers experienced penal code 401 charges and are here to answer any questions If you or a loved one has been charged with penal code 401 and you would like to discuss your case confidentially with one of our criminal defense lawyers at (310) 943-1171.
Acting fraudulently means acting dishonestly and with bad faith, as cheating, misleading and otherwise gaining an unfair advantage for the victim. In case a person won in a game, without playing tricks he can’t be guilty of game fraud. Defendant must be involved in a game where the victim doesn’t have a chance to win as a result of the game. An important element of the legal definition of gaming/gambling fraud is that the defendant must win money or property from the victim.
California Penal Code Section 332 acknowledges that games do not always include cash, or other tangible property. Property for purposes of Section 332 includes chips, markers, tokens, or anything else which has a monetary value.
Common legal defenses to California Penal Code 332 include the following:
Prosecution shall be able to prove is that the defendant had a specific intent to defraud the victim. In case the defendant lacks of fraudulent intent, he can’t be found guilty of this offenses.
If the offense was through the fortune telling or any other similar activity then a first amendment defense can be used, and the defendant can argue that he was exercising his right to free speech. Though, there can be circumstances when fortune tellers can be criminally liable under this statute in case their conduct goes beyond entertainment and actually involves fraud.
Potential penalties for California Penal Code 332 gaming or gambling fraud depend on the monetary value of the property that the defendant obtained from the victim. If the money or the total value of the stolen property is $950 or less the gaming/gambling fraud can only be charged as a misdemeanor. In case the total value of the property is more than $950 then the fraud is treated as a wobbler and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony.
Potential penalties for misdemeanor Penal Code 332 gaming or gambling fraud conviction in California include the following:
Potential penalties for felony Penal Code 332 gaming or gambling fraud conviction in California include the following:
Our California gambling defense lawyers are here to answer any questions If you or a loved one has been charged with Penal Code 332 PC gaming or gambling fraud and you would like to discuss your case confidentially with one of our California criminal defense attorneys, do not hesitate to contact our criminal defense lawyers at (310) 943-1171.
In case the defendant destroyed the evidence when no legal investigation or trial was in process, and later it turned out that the destroyed thing could be used as an evidence in an investigation process that began later he can’t be convicted under Penal Code 135 PC.
A person can be convicted for Penal Code 135 PC intentionally destroying almost any type of evidence such as
It is important to mention that destroying or concealing evidence is not like other California crimes where a person can be charged for attempting to commit a crime. In order to be convicted under California Penal Code Section 135, defendant must have been successful at destroying or concealing the evidence. An unsuccessful attempt to destroy or conceal evidence in California will not lead to a conviction.
There are several common legal defenses for CA Penal Code 135 which including some of the following:
In case defendant wasn’t aware that there was an active criminal investigation when he destroyed or concealed the item of the question, he cannot be convicted of this crime.
In case the evidence was destroyed or concealed accidently and the defendant didn’t act consciously he should not be convicted of this crime.
In case the evidence survived destruction or it was possible to restore it, then the defendant cannot be convicted of concealing or destroying evidence.
Penalties for Penal Code 135 destroying or concealing evidence is a misdemeanor in California Law. The penalties are the following:
The penalties can be leveled in conjunction with penalties for any other crime defendant is accused of. Additionally defendant usually faces to other penalties, such as a 3 year probation period, community service, restitution, civil lawsuits, negative professional licensing consequences, immigration consequences and more.
Hire the most dedicated Glendale criminal defense lawyer who has experience with Penal Code 135 PC cases. You can rely on our experienced California Penal Code 135 PC defense Lawyer to carefully analyze the facts of your case to prove the facts necessary. We back all of our clients and we invite you to give us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our experienced attorney today. Get in touch with us at KAASS LAW, 815 E Colorado St #220, Glendale, CA 91205, (310) 943-1171.
Consent is a positive cooperation in an act meaning that one acts freely and voluntarily. Consenting to sexual act means doing so willingly with realizing the nature of the sexual act. The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the victim did not give the consent to the sexual intercourse
A few legal defenses to California Penal Code 261.5 statutory rape include the following:
Reasonable Mistake as to Consent
The defendant cannot be found guilty of rape if he reasonably and honestly believed that the victim was a consensual and willing participant and gave the approval of sexual intercourse. In case the victim was asleep, unconscious, mentally disabled or intoxicated at the time of the sexual act, then this defense can’t be used.
Insufficient evidence
There may be no physical evidence to confirm the rape charges in case the victim doesn't seek medical care. Likewise, if there were no witnesses, the rape case may only be based on victim’s statements. In situations like this, the legal defense of insufficient evidence may be applicable. There are always difficulties with proving rape charges when the only evidence is the unconfirmed statements of the accuser.
False accusations
Very often, people are wrongly accused of sex crimes. Sometimes, one can accuse another of rape to exert revenge or purely out of jealousy. An individual can also falsely accuse the spouse in order to get a divorce or child custody.
Under California Law rape is considered a felony offense. Possible punishment for this crime:
In case the victim sustains great bodily injury the defendant will face additional three to five years in prison. The punishment increases from 7 to 11 years if the victim is less than 18 years of age. If the victim is under 14, the imprisonment can increase from 9 to 13 years. In most California rape convictions the defendant will also be required to register as a sex offender for a lifetime pursuant.
Hire the most dedicated Glendale criminal defense lawyer to the legal services you require! Our attorneys at KAASS LAW are highly dedicated to help our clients in every way possible. You can rely on our experienced lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles, California, to carefully analyze the facts of your case to prove the facts necessary. We back all of our clients and we invite you to give us a toll free call at (310) 943-1171 to speak to our experienced Glendale criminal battery attorney today. Get in touch with us at KAASS LAW, 815 E Colorado St #220, Glendale, CA 91205, (310) 943-1171at any time!
California Penal Code section 594 requires that defendant “maliciously” commit vandalism. If the action was unintentional, accidental or negligent it serves as a valid legal defense.
In case defendant actually owned the damaged, destroyed or defaced property he should not be found guilty or charged with the offense.
In case the “victim” gave his permission to damage or destroy the property, then defendant did not commit the crime of vandalism.
In case the value of the defaced, damaged, or destroyed property is less than $400, defendant can only be charged with misdemeanor vandalism. If the value of property is $400 or more, then vandalism becomes a wobbler and the defendant can be charged with either a felony or a misdemeanor.
Vandalism crimes are generally eligible for a probation sentence.
Probation terms can include restraining orders, repayment of the damaged property, community service, required counseling. Felony probation requires the defendant to check in with a probation officer, whereas misdemeanor probation does not require the supervision of a probation officer.
If the value of the vandalized and or damaged property is less than $400 the penalties for misdemeanor vandalism under penal code 594 is as follows:
If the value of the vandalized and or damaged property is more than $400 the penalties for misdemeanor vandalism under penal code 594 is as follows:
Penalties for felony vandalism under penal code 594 are as follows:
Defendant’s driver’s License can be suspended up to 2 years. In case the defendant has no license at the time, the Court can suspend the issuance of the license for up to three years.
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 594 or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys.
Give give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
The term “structure” includes not only inhabited or uninhabitable residence but also tunnels, bridges, tents and power. The term “property” includes any personal property of another person like furniture, vehicle, clothing etc.
The fire was an accident
If a person can prove that the fire started accidentally, was absolutely an unintended and went out of control, he won’t be considered guilty of these crimes. There are situation when a person unintentionally created high risk of a fire, but was unaware of the risk because was impaired or voluntarily intoxicated (was drunk or on drugs as a result of his own actions). Though the person was incapable of understanding or appreciating the risk that will not serve as a defense to California Penal Code Section reckless burning charge.
Lack of Sufficient Evidence
Most arson cases are built with only on circumstantial evidence, with no witnesses. The physical evidence does not show the person started a fire, this make the prosecutor’s case very difficult to prove.
The fire was not the reason of arson
Before a person can be convicted of arson, the prosecution needs to prove that arson even took place. Arson is a crime which requires very sophisticated technical investigation.
Penalties for California arson charges vary a great deal, depending on: the nature of the burned property, the defendant's criminal history and whether someone was injured as a result of the fire.
Under PC 451 malicious arson is always a felony, punishable by imprisonment in the California state prison. The potential prison terms are:
The defendant can face an additional fine up to $50,000 or twice the amount of expected financial gain from the fire.
In California it is not illegal to engage in a sexual activity in public. It's only considered unlawful in case person knew or reasonably should have known of the presence of another one who was likely to be offended.
The term “public” is broadly interpreted in lewd conduct cases. It can be a place open to the public such as a vehicle parked by the road, a hallway in an apartment building, shopping malls, adult book stores, public bathrooms. Locations like home, hotel room, place of business are not considered public places. But there can still be a violation of Penal Code 647(a) in case a person can be seen through an open window or door with no blinds or curtains.
Defendant didn't do anything lewd or dissolute
In case the defendant did not touch himself or another person in a way that can be considered as lewd or dissolute act then he is not considered guilty. The prosecutor has the burden of prove that the defendant was engaged in lewd conduct.
Defendant had a reasonable belief that no one was present
This crime requires that person intentionally expose himself in a public place where other people were in plain view or in an area where people usually gather. Unless defendant knew that someone would likely see him and be offended, he won’t be considered guilty Under Penal Code 647(a).
Conduct Was Not In A Public Place
In case the sexual activity took place on private property or an area where the public is not invited then it is not considered a lewd conduct.
Under California PC Section 647(a) engaging in or soliciting another to engage in lewd conduct is a misdemeanor offense, and the penalties are the following:
However, judges usually place first time offenders on probation with little or no jail time. A misdemeanor conviction carries an informal or summary probation for three years. A conviction for lewd conduct in public does not require defendant to register as a sex offender.
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 647(a) or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys, give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.