Commercial Lease Agreements vs. Residential Lease Agreements California commercial lease agreements and residential lease agreement have a few major differences between them. In California, there are a few legal protections available for commercial leases in comparison to residential lease agreements. For instance:
Before signing a commercial lease agreement, it is vital that you review all the terms and ensure that the terms included in the lease agreement will meet the needs of your business. Failure to review the terms thoroughly prior to committing to and signing a lease can lead to unfortunate consequences in the future. Thus, if you are a business owner and wish to enter into a commercial lease agreement it is vital that you have a experienced Glendale business attorney review your commercial lease agreement prior to signing in order to avoid adverse consequences in the future.
These are only a few things a business owner should consider when entering into a commercial lease agreement. Our experienced business law in Los Angeles, CA are available to review for your commercial lease agreement and consult with you on which provisions need changes to ensure you rights are protected. Call (310) 943-1171 and speak with a Los Angeles business law attorney. We are available 24-hours a day.
KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office. KAASS LAW helps clients in Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, San Bernardino, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
[contact-form to='[email protected]' subject='Contract KAASS LAW '][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Phone ' type='text'/][contact-field label='Message' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form]
Before you file a lawsuit for breach of contract in Los Angeles Court there are a few requirements to prove. In order to be successful in a breach of contract lawsuit, the Plaintiff must prove the basic elements for breach of contract, including: Whether or not a valid contract existed.
The four basic requirements of a valid contract include the following:
Motorcycle accident injuries can be reduced by wearing protective gear while riding. While, wearing a motorcycle helmet while riding reduces a motorcyclist’s risk of head trauma, however only by a certain percent. According to CDC wearing a helmet lowers the risk of a head injury by estimated 69 percent and lowers the risk of death by estimated 37 percent. California has motorcycle helmet laws which riders are required to follow. Even when rider wears a helmet, serious head injuries can still occur. Some of the most common motorcycle accident injuries include:
There are many advantages of incorporating a business in California, each business form hold different advantages and disadvantages.
While, there are many benefits of incorporating a business, choosing to register your business under the form of a Limited Liability Company, or "LLC" is one of the more common and better choices. Here are four (4) reasons why forming an LLC in California is the best decision:
An LLC can be organized in various ways. The beauty of an LLC is that the structure of the firm is virtually entirely up to founders' imagination! This is in stark contrast to the rigid, formal structure of a corporation.
Unlike a corporation, which mandates board meetings and shareholder votes along with other burdensome default rules, an LLC has virtually no mandatory rules. Rather, the statutes in your jurisdiction will provide default rules which can be contracted around in the Operating Agreement.
One of the most difficult aspects of protecting your trademark in today's world is protecting it on an international level. Unfortunately, there is no tool that allows business owners to register a trademark "globally". Otherwise, trademark owners must register its trademark in each and every individual country where it seeks trademark protection. Starting October 1, 2017, the European Union trade mark regulation changes. The European Union Intellectual Property Office; among other things, has made a number of procedural changes, thus it is vital you speak to a Glendale trademark attorney in order to help protect your business. Here are three reasons why you should register your trademark internationally.
Once you begin selling your products in international markets, your business name and brand may become more attractive as your popularity grows. Registering your trademark in countries which your products are available can prevent other businesses from attempting to confuse consumers by using your businesses identical or similar name or profit from your business's popularity.
Many business owners believe that incorporating a business is too costly and time consuming. On the other hand, you may be wondering if you truly need to incorporate your business. Quiet frankly, business owners' may find themselves facing personal debts and liabilities in the event of a business dispute or lawsuit. Consequently, business owners then find themselves racking up far more legal fees, costs, stress, and lengthy lawsuits.
There are number of ways California business owners can benefits from incorporating their business. Likewise, California offers a number of different business forms which a business owner may file under. The California Corporations Code outlines minimum filing requirements for incorporating businesses in California. Not all business structure are alike, each offer different benefits and posses disadvantages. Choosing the business structure that best fits your needs its probably the most vital questions any business owners should ask themselves. After all, the foundation and structure of which you build your business will play a major role in your success. Thus, it is a good idea to contact a that can consult you on your options and help you fill in the gaps. We invite you to contact our office and schedule a consultation with a Los Angeles business attorney with strong background in business and economics. Our , near Los Angeles is committed to provide a balanced approach to your legal needs, sound advice and assistance to prevent and or resolve problems.
Some common causes of motorcycle accidents, Los Angeles County:
Traumatic brain injury is divided into two categories -- mild and severe. A traumatic brain injury is considered mild if a loss of consciousness lasts for less than 30 minutes. On the other hand, traumatic brain injury is considered severe, if a loss of consciousness lasts for more than an hour.
Signs of a mild traumatic brain injury include,
Signs of a moderate to severe brain injury may begin within days and symptoms include:
As an owner of a registered trademark or service, you probably wonder when others are responsible for infringing your mark. You should know that the test for trademark infringement is the likelihood of confusion as a result of the similarity of the marks.
A person may be liable for infringement of a federally registered mark if his use of a mark in relation to any goods of services is likely to cause confusion, mistake or to deceive. 15 U.S.C.A. § 1114(1). This test to determine whether a registered mark is being infringed is known as the test of likelihood of confusion.
The test of likelihood of confusion includes not only the confusion as to source but also as to affiliation, connection or sponsorship. Champions Golf Club v. Champions Golf Club, 78 F.3d 1111, 1121 (6th Cir. 1996) (internal citations omitted). This means that a user of a mark may be liable for trademark infringement if the use creates a likelihood of confusion that the goods are affiliated to, connected with or sponsored by the owner of the registered mark.
(a) The owner of any dog is liable for the damages suffered by any person who is bitten by the dog while in a public place or lawfully in a private place, including the property of the owner of the dog, regardless of the former viciousness of the dog or the owner’s knowledge of such viciousness. A person is lawfully upon the private property of such owner within the meaning of this section when he is on such property in the performance of any duty imposed upon him by the laws of this state or by the laws or postal regulations of the United States, or when he is on such property upon the invitation, express or implied, of the owner. (b) Nothing in this section shall authorize the bringing of an action pursuant to subdivision (a) against any governmental agency using a dog in military or police work if the bite or bites occurred while the dog was defending itself from an annoying, harassing, or provoking act, or assisting an employee of the agency in any of the following: (1) In the apprehension or holding of a suspect where the employee has a reasonable suspicion of the suspect’s involvement in criminal activity. (2) In the investigation of a crime or possible crime. (3) In the execution of a warrant. (4) In the defense of a peace officer or another person. (c) Subdivision (b) shall not apply in any case where the victim of the bite or bites was not a party to, nor a participant in, nor suspected to be a party to or a participant in, the act or acts that prompted the use of the dog in the military or police work. (d) Subdivision (b) shall apply only where a governmental agency using a dog in military or police work has adopted a written policy on the necessary and appropriate use of a dog for the police or military work enumerated in subdivision (b). Although, the owner(s)' of a for damages in There is a defense to this rule known as “” Assumption of risk can be used as a defense when the victim of a is working in the capacity of a veterinarian, or some other contracted dog handler. , 16 Cal. App. 4th 650 (Cal. App. 1st Dist. June 15, 1993); , 140 P.3d 848 (Cal. Aug. 28, 2006). “, which is generally applicable in strict liability actions has long been recognized as a defense to a action brought pursuant to the dog bite statute (§ 3342) under appropriate facts.” 140 P.3d 848, 853.
A contract is a binding agreement between two or more parties. Section 1 of the Restatement defines a contract as ‘‘a promise or a set of promises for the breach of which the law gives a remedy, or the performance of which the law in some way recognizes as a duty.’’
An "offer" is a manifestation of present contractual intent, communicated to an identified offeree, containing definite and certain terms. The offer element is further analyzed objectively, rather than subjectively. In order other words, for Plaintiff to prove breach of contract, s/he must also prove that the parties intended to enter into a contract.
Two laws govern contract law and depending on the type of transaction or agreement parties have entered into the Courts will determine under which law governs the contracts. The two laws which govern contracts law is common law contracts and the Uniform Commercial Code.
Most contracts are governed by state common law, such as employment contracts, service contracts, or the sale of real property.
The uniform commercial code "UCC" governs contracts which involve merchants engaging in the sales of goods. UCC applies to:
When a party has breached the terms of a contract or interfered with their contractual duties they can be held liable for tort or damages caused to the other party.
The statute of limitation to bring suit for breach of contract in California depends on the type of contract the parties entered to. Breach of written contract differs from oral contracts.
If you are involved in a business dispute or breach of contract matter we invite you to speak to our Glendale business attorney at KAASS Law today! Give us a call or get in touch with us at (310) 943-1171 using the form below; our attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, and Armenian. [contact-form to='[email protected]' subject='Contract'][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Phone Number' type='text' required='1'/][contact-field label='Message' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form]
The only real reason to lay down your motorcycle is if you are almost certain that you will not be able to stop your bike in time and you have nowhere to swerve to avoid the accident. In other words, if swerving out of the way or hitting your breaks is not an option because you believe that even more serious consequences will results, laying down your motorcycle would be a good choice in this type circumstance.
Successful, rapid stopping is best accomplished by quickly applying both the front and rear brakes at the same time. If doing so results in your front wheel locking, then at that point you have to rapidly disengage the brake before firmly reapplying pressure to the rear brake. On the other hand, if your rear wheel locks up as opposed to the front wheel, then it is best to allow it to remain locked and kee[ applying the brakes until you have completely stopped. Hiring a Los Angeles motorcycle accident attorney and motorcycle accident attorney in Glendale can help motorcycle accident victims preserve their accident claim, increase compensation, and avoid having to deal with the difficulties of insurance companies and insurance adjusters. As experienced motorcycle accident litigators, we have successfully litigated various personal injury cases. KAASS LAW understands the mastery it takes to successfully receive fair settlements during the claims stage of a personal injury or accident case. When you are involved in a motorcycle accident and suffer damages, you are legally entitled to compensation by negligent and responsible parties, or their insurance carriers. We invite you to contact our motorcycle accident attorneys for a free personal injury consultation. We will review your motorcycle accident claim, evaluate the facts surrounding your case, and consult with you on your options. Please call our office at (310) 943-1171 and speak to an experienced Los Angeles motorcycle accident attorney. Give us a call, our attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and Italian. [su_button url="tel:+1 3109431171" background="#2def58" color="#ffffff" size="9" center="yes" icon="icon: share"]CALL US NOW FOR A FREE CONSULT[/su_button] KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office. KAASS LAW Motorcycle Accident Collision Lawyers and Attorneys helps clients in: County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Burbank, West Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Calabasas, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda. Pamona FOR A FREE DETAILED REVIEW BY OUR AWARD WINNING LOS ANGELES MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT ATTORNEYS FILL OUT THE FOLLOWING FORM: [contact-form to='[email protected]' subject='NEW CLIENT - Moto Accident'][contact-field label='Name' type='name' required='1'/][contact-field label='Email' type='email' required='1'/][contact-field label='Phone' type='url' required='1'/][contact-field label='Facts of Accident' type='textarea' required='1'/][/contact-form] https://kaass.com/california-motorcycle-helmet-laws/ https://kaass.com/common-causes-of-motorcycle-accidents/ https://kaass.com/common-traumatic-brain-injury-symptoms/
An LLC has even more limited liability than a corporation or limited liability partnership! The founders can execute an Operating Agreement that vacates most of their fiduciary responsibility. This is extremely important as it shields owners from being personally financially responsible for the liabilities of the LLC should things go wrong. This means that creditors cannot go after the personal assets of the owners to pay business debts.
Unlike a corporation which is subject to "double taxation" (i.e. a corporation pays taxes on its annual earnings while shareholders must also make tax payments on dividend payments), an LLC is eligible for flow-through (aka pass-through) taxation under IRS rules. A Flow-Through entity, such as an LLC, is not subject to taxation. Rather, taxes are only paid once the income passes to the owners. Ultimately, the beauty of an LLC is that it offers the limited liability of a corporation with the freedom and tax advantages of a partnership. Owners of an LLC are shielded from personal liability, avoid double-taxation, and have the flexibility to organize the LLC management structure in any way they see fit. Our Glendale business attorneys will help you make the right decision as each entity has its own significant consequences in matters pertaining to issues of liability, management, ownership, and control; business succession matters such as transfer, assignment, and dissolution; as well as business taxation.
For further question regarding incorporating your business, feel free to contact our office at (310) 943-1172. Our attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and Italian.
KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office.
KAASS LAW immigration attorneys helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
Foreign trademark filing is a big business decision, thus businesses should consider many factors when doing so. U.S. trademark law provides protection against businesses importing counterfeit goods. However, you may also register your trademark in a country where you believe counterfeit goods are originating from. This will not only help prevent counterfeit goods being exported to other countries.
If your business fails to register their trademark internationally, you bare the risk of allowing another party to "take" your trademark first in the foreign country. This can obviously create a lot of problems. For instance, this can disrupt the distribution of your products in or from the country. If you have questions regarding trademark applications or any other business law questions give us a call and receive a free consultation with one of our experienced Glendale business lawyers. KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office. KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, San Bernardino, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
Prior to starting a business, a business name must be selected that is not already in use. You can find out if the fictitious business name you choose is available for use by going to the Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder website. If the business name you selected is available, you may then register with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's Office. Likewise, fictitious business name statements must also be filed with the Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk's Office.
Starting a business is no small task and you should be confident in your abilities to successfully form your business. California offers a number of business structures you can utilize to accomplish certain things. Choose the business structure that best fits your needs.
Sole proprietorships are the basic business form under which a business owner can operate a business. It is important to remember that sole proprietorships are not legal entity. It simply refers to a person who owns the business and is personally responsible for its debts. In other words, a sole proprietorship is owned by one individual, of which is personally taxed on income and is personally liable for debts of the business. Thus, if you are a sole proprietorship, consider registering a sole proprietorship into a corporation. This way you not only protects your personal assets and personal liability, but you also tell the world that you take your business seriously.
A corporation, in its legal form, is an entity separately from you, the business owner. In California, corporations are considered to be an “entity”, you can think of it as a separate “person”. One benefit of registering and filing your business under a corporation is it can shield business owners from personal liability and debits. A corporation is also taxed and so are its shareholders.
A limited liability company, commonly referred to as an “LLC”, offers liability protection like a corporation, but is not taxed as an entity. Instead, the LLC's income is usually taxed through the individual on their income. Corporations provide limited liability protection to their owners. Typically, the owners are not personally responsible for the debts and liabilities of the business; thus, creditors cannot pursue owners’ personal assets.
Hiring a motorcycle accident attorney can help preserve your claim, increase compensation, and deal with the difficulties of dealing with insurance companies and insurance adjusters. Many times the adjusters will try to blame the motorcyclist by saying you were not riding at a safe speed during the collision or perhaps riding at excessive speed. Your motorcycle accident attorney will have Neurologists, Orthopedists, and other doctors to help treat you for your injuries. Many of these specialists take cases on a lien basis. This means that you will not have to pay out of pocket for the treatment you receive until you recover monies. to determine the full extent of the injuries. A quality motorcycle lawyer will hire experts, if necessary, to reconstruct the accident and/or speak to the forces exerted on the human body of the motorcycle rider. If you or a loved one has been involved in a motorcycle accident in Glendale near Los Angeles, CA we invite you to contact our office for a free confidential consultation and case evaluation with an experienced Glendale personal injury attorneys and Los Angeles motorcycle accident lawyers at (310) 943-1171. Give us a call, our attorneys speak English, French, Spanish, Russian, Armenian, and Italian.
Often times, common traumatic brain injury symptoms are not immediately apparent. It may take several days or weeks for traumatic brain injury symptoms to surface. This depends on a number of factors including how severe was the incident. It is important to speak to your physician's if you begin to notice physical or behavioral changes. You should also consider receiving an MRI of your brain. A thorough neurological examination or a brain imaging scan should reveal any damage to the brain's surface.
It is important to collect all the documentation and medical records that are related to the injury. Also, it is a good idea to keep a journal and keeping track of the time and effects the injury has on your daily life. Consult with an experienced traumatic brain injury lawyer. Your attorney will consult with out on your options, whether there was any potential negligence that can be asserted against the third party. You may be able to collect monetary compensation, the cost of therapy, medical expenses, loss of income, reduced quality of life, and more for a traumatic brain injury cases. Have you or a loved one suffered a traumatic brain injury due to the negligence of another? A Los Angeles personal injury attorney from KAASS Law may be able to provide you with legal assistance.
In order to show likelihood of confusion, there must be a probability of confusion; mere possibility of confusion is not enough. Nora Beverages, Inc. v. The Perrier Group of America, Inc., 269 F.3d 114, 121 (2d Cir. 2001) (internal citations omitted). It should also be noted that plaintiff does not have to prove actual confusion in order to show that the defendant is liable for trademark infringement. Perfumebay.com Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 506 F.3d 1165, 1176 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal citations omitted). If the plaintiff is able to show likelihood of confusion the defendant will still be liable for trademark infringement even if the plaintiff shows no instances of actual confusion.
The test for likelihood of confusion is whether a reasonably prudent consumer is likely to be confused as a result of the similarity of the marks. Dreamwerks Production Group, Inc. v. SKG Studio, 142 F.3d 1127, 1129 (9th Cir. 1998) (internal citations omitted). The likelihood of confusion exists when there is a likelihood that an appreciable number of reasonably prudent consumers is likely to be misled or confused because of the similarity of the marks. McGregor-Doniger, Inc. v. Drizzle, Inc., 599 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir. 1979) (internal citations omitted). To sum up, there is a likelihood of confusion when there is a probability that an appreciable number of reasonably prudent consumers will be confused as to the source, affiliation, connection or sponsorship of goods or services because of the similarity of the two marks.
Federal courts in different federal circuits have come up with multi-factor tests in order to determine whether there is a likelihood of confusion or not. The test in the 9th Circuit, which includes the State of California, is the eight-factor Sleekcraft test pursuant to which the court shall consider the following factors to determine if there is a likelihood of confusion or not:
These factors are not requirements but are helpful guidelines for courts in order to determine whether there is a likelihood of confusion or not. Eclipse Ass’n, Ltd. v. Data General Corp., 894 F.2d 1114, 1118 (9th Cir. 1990). The application of the text shall be flexible, and there is no specific formula setting forth how the factors included in the text shall be considered. Nautilus Group, Inc. v. ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 372 F.3d 1330, 1346 (Fed. Cir. 2004) (internal citations omitted). The important question is what the analysis as a whole reveals about the issue of likelihood of confusion. Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. Smith, 279 F.3d 1135, 1141 (9th Cir. 2002). This means that none of the factors is determinative but the analysis as a whole shall answer the question whether there is a likelihood of confusion or not.
It should be noted that the degree of similarity of marks necessary to show likelihood of confusion varies depending on the competitiveness of goods and services. The more similar the goods or services the less similar marks need to be in order to prove likelihood of confusion. Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Century Life of America, 970 F.2d 874, 877 (internal citations omitted). Conversely, “… the greater the degree of similarity between the marks, the lesser the degree of similarity between the goods is necessary to support a finding of likelihood of confusion.” The Board of Regents, University of Texas System v. Southern Illinois Miners, LLC, 110 U.S.P.Q.2d 1182, 1189 (internal citations omitted). Hence, if the marks are very similar the court may find a likelihood of confusion even if the goods or services at issue are not very similar. To summarize, your trademark or service mark is being infringed if a use of another mark creates a likelihood of confusion among consumers. If the other mark is very similar to your trademark or service mark you might have a cause of action for trademark infringement even if the goods or services are not very similar. If you believe someone is infringing on your trademark or have questions regarding trademark registration, copyright, or any other intellectual property related question, we invite you to contact our office and speak to one of our experienced business attorneys at (310) 943-1171.
While many may be under the impression that you can only be sued if your dog bit someone which resulted in scarring or breaking of the skin; "it is not necessary that the skin be broken in order for the statute to apply". (Johnson v. McMahan (1998) 68 Cal.App.4th 173, 176 [80 Cal.Rptr.2d 173].) In Priebe, the Supreme Court of California held that the defendant dog owner was not strictly liable when his dog bit the plaintiff kennel worker. Id. at 861. The court reasoned, “Priebe, by virtue of the nature of her occupation as a kennel worker, assumed the risk of being bitten or otherwise injured by the dogs under her care and control while in the custody of the commercial kennel where she worked pursuant to a contractual boarding agreement.” Id. Similarly, the court in Cohen, held that the plaintiff veterinarian assumed the risk of being bitten by the defendant’s dog, and therefore was barred from recovery. Cohen, 16 Cal. App. 4th 650, 657. However, the court in Davis v. Gaschler, held that the assumption of risk did not apply when the plaintiff stopped to help a dog that was hit by a car and was bitten by the dog. Davis v. Gaschler, 11 Cal. App. 4th 1392, 1402 (Cal. App. 3d Dist. Dec. 23, 1992). The court reasoned, “plaintiff was not employed or otherwise compensated for helping injured dogs. Nor was there an employment relationship or any relationship between plaintiff and defendants.” Id. at 1401.
In California, dog owners can be held responsible for the harm from a dog bite, no matter how carefully they guard or restrain their dogs.
The plaintiff bit by the dog was lawfully on the private property of the owner if [he/ she] was performing any duty required by law or was on the property at the invitation, express or implied, of the owner.
Are you in need of a dog bite lawyer in California? A Los Angeles dog bite attorney can provide you with the services you need. KAASS Law can help you out with various types of personal injury and dog bite cases. If you have questions regarding dog bite laws in California, we invite you to contact our experienced Glendale personal injury attorneys for a free consultation at (310) 943-1171 or our Los Angeles branch at (310) 943-1173.