The California Family Rights Act (CFRA) provides eligible employees with crucial job-protected leave. This is so that someone can care for themselves or their families during times of need. However, many employees are unaware of their rights under CFRA. Employers sometimes violate these rights, leading to stressful and unlawful situations. The following is helping to shed light on CFRA violations and how KAASS Law can help protect your rights.
What is the CFRA?
The California Family Rights Act (CRFA) has aimed to ensure employees with a right to a temporary leave from employment. The CFRA allows eligible employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave during a 12-month period for the following reasons:
To bond with a new child: This includes birth, adoption, or foster care placement.
To care for a seriously ill family member: This includes a spouse, domestic partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild, or sibling.
To care for their own serious health condition: Illness, injury, impairment, or physical or mental condition that requires immediate care.
Who is Eligible for CFRA Leave?
To be eligible for CFRA leave, you must meet the following criteria:
Work for a covered employer: This generally includes employers with 50 or more employees.
Have worked for the employer for at least 12 months: And for at least 1,250 hours during the 12 months preceding the leave.
Work at a location where the employer has at least 50 employees within 75 miles.
Elements of California Family Rights Act Violations
According to CACI 2600 to establish this claim of refusing to grant family care or medical leave, or refusing to return to the same or a comparable job when the family care or medical leave ended the plaintiff must prove all of the following elements:
Plaintiff was eligible for family care or medical leave.
Plaintiff requested or took leave for either of the following reasons: the birth of a child or bonding with the child; for the placement of a child for adoption or foster care; to care for a child, parent, spouse who had a serious health condition; for own serious health condition that made him unable to perform job functions.
Plaintiff provided reasonable notice to the defendant of the need for family care or medical leave, including its expected timing and length.
Defendant refused to grant the plaintiff’s request for family care or medical leave, or, refused to return the plaintiff to the same or a comparable job when or otherwise violated CFRA rights.
As a result of the defendant's decision, the plaintiff was harmed.
Eligibility for Family Care or Medical Leave
The plaintiff must also prove the following to show the eligibility for family care or medical leave:
Plaintiff was an employee of the defendant.
Defendant employed 50 or more employees within 75 miles of the plaintiff’s workplace.
At the time the plaintiff requested or began the leave, he had more than twelve months of service and had worked at least 1,250 hours during the previous 12 months.
At the time the plaintiff requested or began the leave he should have taken no more than 12 weeks of family care or medical leave in the 12-month period.
The employee must provide reasonable notice to the defendant of the need for medical leave or family care including its expected timing and length. An employee is required to give their employer 30 days advanced notice of taking family leave.
Benefits of California Family Rights Act
California Family Rights Act leave is generally unpaid leave unless the employee chooses to use sick leave, vacation time, or other paid leave time. In case CFRA leave is for the employee’s own serious health condition, the employer can require the employee to use accrued leave. Full-time employees can take leave for up to twelve workweeks in a twelve-month period and part-time employees can take leave on a proportional basis. An employee doesn't need to take leave in one continuous period of time.
Remedies for Violating California Family Rights Act
Unfortunately, CFRA violations are not uncommon. Some of the most frequent violations include:
Denying Eligible Employees CFRA Leave: Employers cannot refuse to grant CFRA leave to eligible employees who have a qualifying reason for leave.
Interfering with CFRA Rights: Employers cannot discourage employees from taking CFRA leave or retaliate against them for doing so. This includes actions like demotion, disciplinary action, or termination.
Failing to Reinstate Employees: Upon return from CFRA leave, employees are generally entitled to be reinstated to their same or a comparable position.
Discriminating Against Employees Who Take CFRA Leave: Employers cannot discriminate against employees based on their use of CFRA leave. This includes denying promotions, raises, or other benefits.
Counting CFRA Leave Against Employees: Employers cannot count CFRA leave as a negative factor in performance reviews or attendance records.
Employees to Use Paid Leave Concurrently: they cannot force employees to exhaust all paid leave before taking unpaid CFRA leave
If you believe you have been denied a family leave by your employer we invite you to contact our Los Angeles employment lawyer at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation. KAASS Law is here to help! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdeL6JZjQ50
On July 1, 2018, California’s Fair Employment and Housing Commission regulations expand its protections against “national origin discrimination" under the FEHA. Fair Employment and Housing Act apply to public employers in California. National origin discrimination is serious, and we must actively enforce zero tolerance everywhere, at all times. California takes pride in its diversity, and the law reflects this commitment to inclusivity. The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) provides robust protections against workplace discrimination, including discrimination based on national origin. At KAASS Law, we champion the rights of employees and strive to create workplaces free from prejudice and bias. The following will explore national origin discrimination under FEHA and how we can help if your rights have been violated.
FEHA
Enacted in September 18, 1959, FEHA was a big step on improving equality and fairness amongst all types of people in California. The Fair Employment and Housing Act (California Government Code Section 12900-12951 & 12927-12928 & 12955 - 12956.1 & 12960-12976) provides protection from harassment or discrimination in employment because of: age (40 and over), ancestry, color, creed, denial of family and medical care leave, disability (mental and physical) including HIV and AIDS, marital status, medical condition (cancer and genetic characteristics),, religion, sex, and sexual orientation. The Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) also prohibits discrimination in all aspects of housing (rental, lease, terms and conditions, etc.) because of a person's disability. The definition of disability used in California exceeds the Federal definition and can be found in the housing section of the Act.
The California workplace is destine to be a safe and fair environment where employees can contribute their skills and talents without fear of reprisal. However, the unfortunate reality is that workplace retaliation remains a pervasive issue, affecting individuals across various industries and professions. Retaliation can take many forms, from subtle acts of intimidation to outright termination, and it can have devastating consequences for those who dare to speak out against wrongdoing or assert their legal rights.
At KAASS Law, we believe that everyone deserves a workplace free from fear and intimidation. We dedicated in empowering employees with knowledge about their rights. Additionally, we strive for fearless legal representation to those who are victims to unlawful retaliation from unjust employers. The following will explore the issues of workplace retaliation in California. Importantly, we attempting to navigate our clients by explaining their rights and how we can help if you are a victim in the workplace. First, we need to uncover what workplace retaliation really is and then take steps on resolving this issue.
What is Workplace Retaliation?
Workplace retaliation occurs when an employer takes adverse action against an employee because the employee has engaged in a protected activity. California law prohibits retaliation against employees who. Workplace retaliation can include any of the following actions:
Debt can be a stressful burden, but dealing with aggressive or unethical debt collectors can make a difficult situation even worse. Fortunately, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) provides crucial protections against harassment and abuse by debt collectors. At KAASS Law, we commit to helping consumers understand their rights under the FDCPA and fight back against unfair debt collection practices.
What is the FDCPA?
Enacted in 1977, the FDCPA is a federal law that regulates the conduct of collectors. It prohibits a wide range of abusive, unfair, and deceptive practices, empowering consumers to stand up to harassment and seek justice for violations.
According to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) it is unlawful for the debt collector to use unfair, abusive, or deceptive practices when collecting debts. Types of debt that are covered under the FDCPA include:
Gender discrimination happens when the company treats an employee differently because the person is a man or a woman. Gender discrimination in the workplace can be in different forms and the law applies to both women and men, though women are considered the predominant victim.
Federal and State Laws Governing Gender Discrimination in the Workplace
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
This is a federal law which prohibits employers from discriminating against several protected classes, including sex and gender. Title VII, Civil Rights Act of 1964 applies to employers who have fifty of more employees. It applies to federal, state, local governments, employment agencies public and private universities or colleges and labor organizations.
Equal Pay Act of 1963
Equal Pay Act of 1963 is a federal law which expands on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The Act only protects against wage discrimination, unlike Title VII which covers all types of employment discriminations.
Age discrimination happens when the job applicant or an employee receives less favorable treatment because of his age. California two main sets of law: the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) protect the employees against age discrimination.
Examples of Age-Based Discrimination
It is against public policy to discriminate against employees over the age of 40 based on their age. This includes treating employees differently due to age, with respect to the employees:
compensation
work conditions
job assignments
terms of employment
Some common examples of age-based discrimination include:
Refusing to hire older employees, despite being equal or more qualified than others
Refusing to promote the employee because of his age
Firing the employee, after he reaches a certain age
Are you wondering if you have been a victim of employee disability discrimination in California? According to California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), it is unlawful for the employer to discriminate against any person based on mental or physical disability. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects qualified employees and applicants from employment discrimination based on disability.
Elements of Workplace Disability Discrimination
According to CACI 2540 to establish the claim of employment discrimination based on disability the plaintiff must be able to establish the following elements:
The defendant was the employer of the plaintiff or the plaintiff applied to the defendant for a job
Defendant knew that the plaintiff had a physical disability
Plaintiff was able to perform the essential job duties with reasonable accommodation for his physical condition
Defendant discharged or refused to hire the plaintiff or subjected the plaintiff to an adverse employment action or the plaintiff was constructively discharged
Slip and fall accidents are more common than you might think, especially in California. Picture this: you're walking down a grocery store aisle, and suddenly, you find yourself on the floor, nursing a twisted ankle or worse. These incidents, often dismissed as minor mishaps, can lead to serious injuries and significant expenses. If you have an injury due to a slip and fall accident in California, understanding your rights is crucial. Personal injuries that cause slip and fall accidents are under premises liability laws. This allows victims, injured as the result of the negligence of the property owner to recover compensation for their injuries.
Premise Liability
According to Civil Jury Instruction 1000, the plaintiff must establish the following four elements to prove a premises liability claim:
Defendant owned, leased, or controlled the property
Defendant was negligent in their use or care for the property
Plaintiff has an injury
Defendant’s negligence was a significant factor in causing injury to the plaintiff
Plant closings and mass layoffs are devastating events for workers, families, and entire communities. The sudden loss of income and benefits can create significant financial hardship. This can also be an emotional toll since unemployment can be equally devastating. In the United States, while the right to close a plant or lay off workers generally rests with the employer. However, there are federal and state laws in place aimed at providing some protection and assistance to affected employees. Here at KAASS LAW, we want to explore these laws. The following will aim towards focusing on the key federal legislation for plant closings and layoff laws. The decision to close a plant or lay off employees is a very serious matter. It carries significant consequences for both the company and its workforce. In the United States, a complex web of federal and state laws governs these actions. This aims to protect workers' rights and provide some level of support during difficult transitions. California employees have some certain rights in case their employer closes a facility, conducts a mass layoff, or otherwise cuts a huge number of jobs. Though employees don’t have a legal right to keep their jobs. Nor to be hired into other positions with the company or be considered for rehire, but they have the right to a certain amount of notice before a large-scale layoff or a plant closing. According to the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN) employees are entitled to damages in this case employer fails to give proper notice. California also has its own version of the WARN Act
Employees who are temporarily out of work due to no fault of their own may be eligible for unemployment benefits. However, eligibility requirements, prior earnings requirements, benefit amounts, and other details differ by state. The following are the basic guidelines for receiving unemployment benefits in California. The Employment Development Department in California is the agency in charge of unemployment benefits (EDD).
Differences Between Regular Unemployment and COVID-19 Unemployment
The impact of COVID-19 does not require a person to have a layoff in order to receive benefits. Additionally, federal laws have changed in order to include those out of work due to the virus. Now, states can pay benefits in the following situations:
Unemployed as his employer temporarily ceasing operations due to virus
Has reduced hours at work due to the virus
Quarantined with the expectation of returning to work after the quarantine is over
Has voluntarily left his work due to a risk of infection
The regulations clarify the definition of "national origin” and includes “the individual’s or an ancestor’s actual or perceived characteristics including:
Physical, cultural, or linguistic characteristics associated with a national origin group
Marriage to or association with persons of a national origin group
Tribal affiliation
Membership in or association with an organization identified with or seeking to promote the interests of a national origin group;
Attendance or participation in schools, churches, temples, mosques or other religious institutions generally used by persons of national origin group; and
Name that has association with a national origin group.
The regulations also provide protections to “national origin groups” including geographic places of origin, ethnic groups, and countries that are not presently in existence. Under this definition, an employee’s protected national origin status includes:
A geographic location or country
A formerly existing country
A region that is not a country but is with an ethnic group.
The regulations also state that “undocumented employee or applicant employee” is the appropriate reference to someone who lacks authorization under federal law to be or work in the USA.
National Origin Discrimination by Language Restrictions at Workplace
Since 2001, the State of California has prohibited employers from adopting a policy that prohibits or limits the use of any particular language in the workplace, unless the employer met certain notice requirements and a business necessity justified the restriction. The regulations also state additional restrictions on employers who limit or prohibit employees from using any language in the workplace. Workplace language restrictions are prohibited unless:
The restriction is justified by a business necessity. (Business necessity doesn’t exist where the restriction is based on mere “business convenience.”)
The restriction is narrowly tailored
The employer notifies employees of the time and conditions when the restriction must be observed and the consequences for violating the restrictions.
According to the regulations "English-only rules are not lawful during an employee's non-work time. For example such as lunch, breaks or unpaid employer-sponsored events.
Immigration-Related Practices
The regulations place some restrictions on immigration-related practices also. The employer cannot inquire into an employee's immigration status unless he can present clear and convincing evidence. Such an inquiry is necessary to comply with federal immigration law. It is also illegal for an employer to retaliate against or discriminate against the employee because of the employee's immigration status unless he can present clear and convincing evidence that such inquiry is necessary to comply with federal immigration law. The employer can’t take adverse action against an employee who updates or attempts to update his personal information because of a change in the name, government-issued employment documents, or social security number.
KAASS Law: Fighting for Workplace Equality
Discrimination isn't something we take for granted. These types of behaviors can put a toll on victims' livelihood and their finances. We can help and fight for any claims of potential financial compensation! At KAASS Law, we commit to fighting for workplace equality and protecting employees from all forms of discrimination. If you have experienced national origin discrimination, contact us today for a free consultation. We can help you understand your rights, navigate the legal process, and seek justice for the discrimination you have suffered.
If you believe there has been discrimination against due to your national origin, we invite you to contact our Los Angeles employment lawyer at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation and case review.
When is Retaliation in California is Considered Illegal?
In California, workplace retaliation is considered illegal when the employer punishes his employees for the following actions:
Reporting illegal conduct
Refusing to engage in illegal conduct
Filing a wage claim with the California Labor Commissioner
Filing discrimination lawsuits
Reporting of workplace harassment
Reporting of workplace discrimination
Requesting a reasonable accommodation due to a disability
Assisting other employees in filing a complaint or lawsuit of unlawful activity in the workplace.
Filing a Claim with Department of Fair Employment and Housing ("DFEH")
The employee, who engaged in protected activity and was demoted or terminated as a result can file a claim with DFEH under the Fair Employment and Housing Act("FEHA"). In order to preserve your right, the employee must file a claim with DFEH within 1 year from the time of the retaliation. The department will investigate the claim and if there is enough evidence, proceeds with the claim. If not, the claim will be closed. Then the employee will be able to file a lawsuit against his employer. By filing a lawsuit, an employee can recover compensation for:
Attorney fees and costs
Back pay and front pay
Lost benefits and mental anguish.
An employee is also protected from workplace retaliation under federal law in case he files a harassment or discrimination complaint at work either internally or to an outside body like the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Federal law also protects an employee who cooperates in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission investigations or serves as witnesses in EEOC litigation or investigations.
The Legal Standard for a Retaliation Claim in California
Employer subjected the employee to an adverse employment action,
The two are related.
It is important to mention, that the employee is not required to prove the employer’s action was illegal to establish the claim. To prove a retaliation claim in California, an employee must show the following:
He has engaged in a "protected activity"
He suffered a tangible adverse employment action, such as termination or demotion
The main reason for being terminated or demoted was that protected activity.
Differences Between Whistleblowing and Retaliation Claims
Very often retaliation and whistleblowing claims are discussed interchangeably however, they are not identical. Whistleblowing typically involves complaints or claims which focus on activities prohibited by law and activities that compromise public safety. A retaliation claim is more connected with individual employee rights, such as the right to speak up against harassment, the right to be paid overtime, etc.
Types of Retaliation Claims in California
Under California law there are the following types of retaliation claims:
Discrimination claim retaliation
Union and concerted activity retaliation
Public employees and First Amendment rights retaliation
Wage and hour retaliation
Political activity retaliation
Workers’ comp retaliation
KAASS Law: Standing Up for Employee Rights
At KAASS Law, we are dedicated to protecting employees from unlawful retaliation and ensuring that they can exercise their rights without fear of reprisal. If you have experienced retaliation in the workplace, contact us today for a free consultation. We can help you understand your legal options and fight for the justice you deserve. There are laws that protect you from you employment discrimination. If you believe that you are a victim of employment retaliation, from your employer, we invite you to contact our Los Angeles employment law attorney California Employee Relation Attorney today at (310) 943-1171.
Business debts are not covered under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
According to the FDCPA Can a Debt Collector Legally Contact a Person’s Employer?
Debt collectors are allowed to contact the employer in the following cases:
In case the person or his legal representative agreed in writing that the debt collector can contact his employer
For verifying the employment
To find out person’s location information
To garnish person’s wages (but only after the debt collector sued him/her and the court entered a judgment against him)
To find out whether the person has a medical insurance
The person’s parents or guardian in case he/she is under 18
The person’s attorney
Credit reporting companies, if allowed by law
А debt collector is not allowed to contact person’s family members, neighbors, or other people about his debt unless:
To find out person’s location information;
A debt collector is acting with a court permit
It is reasonably necessary to effectuate the court judgment
The person or his/her legal representative agreed in writing that the debt collector can contact other people.
Disputing a Debt & Debt Collector
In case the debt collector contacts a person about his/her debt that he/she doesn’t owe, it is important to respond in writing to dispute the debt as soon as possible. In case the person fails to respond, the debt collector will keep trying to collect the debt and can even sue him/her. A debt collector first contacts the person within five days and then he/she must send him/her a "validation notice," which contains the following information:
The amount it supposed the person owes
The creditor’s name
How to dispute the debt in writing.
A person must dispute the debt in writing within thirty days of when the debt collector first contacted him/her. In this case the debt collector must stop trying to collect the debt until it can show the person verification of the debt. A person must dispute a debt in writing in case:
He/she doesn’t owe the debt
He/she already paid the debt
He/she wants more information about the debt
He/she wants the debt collector to stop contacting him/her
What Are Debt Collectors Not Allowed to Do According to FDCPA?
According to the FDCPA, debt collectors are not legally allowed to harass a person, such as:
Threaten him/her with harm or violence
Use offensive or disrespectful language
Use a phone to purposely annoy the person by continuously
Debt collectors cannot legally lie to a person, such as:
Misrepresent him the amount of the debt he owes
Misleadingly claim the person will be arrested
Misleadingly claim that the legal action will be against him
Debt collectors are not legally cannot engage in unfair practices, such as:
Try to collect fees, interest or other charges unless state law or the contract allows it
Take or threaten to take the person’s property unless it can legally
Deposit a post-dated check early
How KAASS Law Can Help
If you believe a debt collector has violated the FDCPA, KAASS Law can help you:
Understand Your Rights: We'll explain your rights under the FDCPA and assess whether your rights have been violated.
Gather Evidence: We'll help you gather evidence of the debt collector's violations, such as call logs, letters, and voicemails.
Negotiate with Collectors: We'll communicate with debt collectors on your behalf and negotiate for a fair resolution.
File a Lawsuit: If necessary, we'll file a lawsuit against the debt collector to seek compensation for damages, including actual damages, statutory damages (up to $1,000), and attorney's fees.
Contact Us
Dealing with aggressive debt collectors can be intimidating. KAASS Law is here to protect your rights and help you regain control of the situation. If you're experiencing harassment or unfair treatment from a collector, contact us today for a free consultation.
Get in touch with KAASS Law for more information at (310) 943-1171 or by filling out the form below. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act is a state law which applies to both public and private employers, employment agencies and labor organizations. It is the most powerful anti-discrimination law in California and prohibits employers from discriminating against employees and job applicants. Individuals who are protected under this law:
Employees
Unpaid interns
Volunteers
Contractors
Job applicants
Examples of Gender Discrimination:
Here are some examples of discrimination at the workplace based on a person’s gender.
Employer refused to hire the person
Employer demoted the person
Employer fired the person
Employer paid less
Employer reduced the salary
Employer denied equal pay
Employer denied person’s benefits
Employer denied a promotion
Employer harassed the person
Employer refused pregnancy disability leave
Employer refused to select the person for a training program
Employer denied reinstatement
Effects of Discrimination at the Workplace
When a person becomes the victim of gender discrimination at the workplace, he will likely experience the following:
Decrease in productivity
Low self-esteem
The tension between the company and the victim
Frustration, fear or anger
Isolation from the rest of the team
Statute of Limitations for Filing Gender Discrimination Charges in California
According to the California state DFEH agency, a statute of limitations for filing an administrative charge is one year from the day of the last act of discrimination.
Damages Available in an Employment Discrimination Lawsuit
In California the damages available in an employment discrimination lawsuit depend on the type of discrimination involved and can include:
Back pay
Front pay
Higher income from a promotion
Higher income from a raise
Different types of benefits
Pain and suffering
Emotional distress
In some cases also punitive damages are available
If you have experienced or are experiencing gender discrimination, talk to our experienced employment lawyer as soon as possible. Make sure that you do before the statute of limitations is up. KAASS Law can help you file an administrative charge and collect the right evidence to prove the claim in court. Get in touch now by giving us a call at (310) 943-1171 or by using the form below. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act prohibit retirement plans with a mandatory age of retirement, but there are some exceptions, which allow for mandatory retirement.
Bona Fide Executives and High Policymakers. Private employers are allowed to impose mandatory retirement for bona fide executives or high policymaking employees. But, these employees must be at least 65 years old and be entitled to yearly retirement benefits of at least $27,000
Physicians at the age of 70 or older, working in a professional medical corporation that provides for compulsory retirement.
Tenured faculty members
Filling an Age Discrimination Claim
If an employee wishes to file suit against his employer he must first file a written complaint with a DFEH. If the employee seeks to bring a claim under federal law, he can file the complaint with either the DFEH or the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). In case, after filing a complaint with the appropriate administrative agency, the claim is not resolved, the employee is issued a right-to-sue notice. After that, the employee may pursue his case by bringing a lawsuit in court.
Elements the Plaintiff Must Prove in Employment Age Discrimination Cases
According to CACI 2570, in case the plaintiff claims that the defendant wrongfully discriminated against him because of his age, he must prove the following elements to establish this claim:
The defendant was an employer or other covered entity;
Plaintiff was an employee of the defendant or applied to the defendant for a job;
Defendant discharged or refused to hire the plaintiff, subjected the plaintiff to an adverse employment action or the plaintiff was constructively discharged;
the plaintiff was at the age of 40 or older at the time of the discharge;
plaintiff's age was a substantial motivating reason for the defendant’s decision to discharge or refuse to hire him;
the plaintiff was harmed; and
Defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in causing harm to the plaintiff
Statute of Limitations for an Age Discrimination Claim in California
The employee must file a complaint with the DFEH no later than one year starting from the date of the discriminatory act.
An employee has one year to file a lawsuit in civil court after being issued a right-to-sue letter.
An employee 300 days after the discriminatory act to bring a claim under federal law.
In case EEOC or DFEH issues a right-to-sue letter, the employee has 90 days to bring a lawsuit against the employer in court based on federal claims.
Age Discrimination Attorney
If you believe you have suffered age discrimination by your employer, we invite you to contact our employment lawyer at KAASS Law to ensure that your rights are protected. We can provide you with a free consultation and case review. Get in touch now by calling us at 310-943-1171 or by using the form below. [contact-form-7 id="5673" title="KAASS LAW Contact Form"]
Plaintiff’s physical condition was a substantial motivating reason for the defendant’s decision to discharge or refuse to hire the plaintiff
Defendant’s conduct caused harm to the plaintiff
Plaintiff does not need to prove that the defendant held any ill will or animosity toward him personally because he was perceived to be disabled.
Examples of Employment Disability Discrimination
Examples of employment disability discrimination include:
Refusing to employ or hire a person with disabilities
Refusing to select a person with disabilities for a training program
Bearing, firing, or discharging a person with disabilities
Reducing payment
Denying employee benefits
Denying promotion opportunities
Demoting
Denying job reinstatement
Assigning different duties to a person with disabilities
Any other discrimination in any way
Reasonable Accommodation for People With Disabilities
A reasonable accommodation is any change to the application or hiring process, that way perform the main functions or the work environment that allows a person with a disability who is qualified for the job to perform the essential functions of that job and enjoy equal employment opportunities.
Examples of Reasonable Accommodation:
Changing a work schedule, such as allowing a part-time work
Allowing an employee with disabilities to work from home
Modifying or adjusting training materials, exams and policies
Providing interpreters or readers
Providing modified devices, equipment, or furniture
Filing an Employee Disability Discrimination Claim With the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing or U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Depending on the type of the case and the jurisdiction and type of discrimination case, a person can file with either the EEOC or DFEH. Claims must be filled in accordance with the statute of limitations. The employer can file the claim as soon as he became aware of the discriminatory conduct. After the agency receives a complaint from the employer, an investigation takes place. During this investigation, the agency will obtain relevant evidence of the employer’s unlawful conduct and in case it determines that workplace discrimination occurred. The agency can undertake one of the following steps:
Arrange a settlement meeting between the employee and the employee;
Mediate a suitable settlement to end the claim and compensate the injured employee;
If settlement negotiations fail or the investigation; or
If it's determined that the agency will not pursue the matter, a “right to sue” notice will be issued. The employee can still pursue a lawsuit if he decides to do so.
Los Angeles Disability Discrimination Attorney
If you believe that your employer has discriminated against you on the basis of a disability, we invite you to contact our employment law attorney at (310) 943-1171, for a free consultation.
California law operates on the principle of "premises liability." This means property owners and occupiers have a legal duty to maintain safe conditions for visitors. This includes customers in stores, guests in homes, and even trespassers in certain situations. When someone is injured because of a dangerous condition on another person’s property, he can sue either the owner, occupier or possessor of that property. This may include homeowners, landlords, businesses, and other property owners.
How to Establish the Property Owner’s Negligence?
According to California Civil Jury Instruction 1003 defendant was negligent in the use or maintenance of the property in case:
A condition on the property created an unreasonable risk of harm
Defendant knew or, through the exercise of reasonable care or should have known about it
Defendant failed to repair the condition, protect against harm from the condition, or give adequate warning of the condition
What to Do After a Slip and Fall Accident
If you have an injury due to a slip and fall, taking the following steps can help protect your rights and strengthen your potential claim:
Seek medical attention: Your health is the priority. Even if your injuries seem minor, get a medical evaluation to document them.
Report the incident: Notify the property owner or manager about the accident and ensure an incident report is filed.
Gather evidence: Take photos or videos of the accident scene, including the hazardous condition that caused your fall. If there were any witnesses, get their contact information.
Preserve evidence: Keep your shoes and clothing worn at the time of the accident.
Avoid social media: Refrain from posting about your accident or injuries on social media.
Statute of Limitations for Slip and Fall Accidents in California
According to California Code of Civil Procedure section 335.1 a victim has a two-year period for the filing of "an action for his injury to, or for the death of, an individual caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another." According to California Code of Civil Procedure section 338 there is a separate three-year deadline for filing a lawsuit over the repair or replacement of personal property was damaged in the slip and fall.
Bringing a Claim Against Government
In case your slip and fall injury was caused by the negligence of a government employee then the claim you file must follow a special set of rules. You will be required to provide notice of your claim within a six-month period and give the municipal or state government a chance to respond to your allegations.
Comparative Negligence
According to this rule, any damages award the plaintiff receives will reduce according to the percentage of his fault. A property owner can make different arguments to attempt to pin the blame on the plaintiff. Here are some examples of arguments:
The dangerous condition of the property should have been obvious to the plaintiff.
The plaintiff was on a part of the property or possibly trespassing.
The plaintiff was wearing inappropriate footwear.
The plaintiff took the reasonable and necessary step to protect visitors and the dangerous condition.
The plaintiff wasn’t paying attention to where he was walking.
In case the plaintiff’s California slip and fall case makes it to court, regardless of the argument the property owner makes, the state’s "pure comparative negligence rule" will determine how much compensation the plaintiff can get from the property owner. [embed]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o0HMbXd0Vw[/embed]
Contact Us
If you sustained an injury due to a slip and fall accident in California, don't hesitate to seek legal help. Understanding your rights and taking the right steps after an accident can make a significant difference in your ability to recover compensation and get back on your feet. Are you in need to services for a slip and fall accident? Our Los Angeles slip and fall lawyers at KAASS Law would be happy to help you out in every way we can. Get in touch with us now at (310) 943-1171 for assistance!
Differences Between Federal and California Warn Laws
According to the Federal WARN Act, companies that employ a certain number of employees are required to provide affected employees, their representatives and specified government officials and agencies with sixty days’ advance, written notice prior to any mass layoffs or plant closings. California’s WARN Act is much broader in scope than the federal law and affects more employers. Accordingly, companies must comply with the requirements of both laws and penalties, including up to sixty days’ back pay per employee, could be assessed for failing to provide required notice.
Who Are the Covered Employers?
Federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act and California’s WARN Act require employers to give advance notice of mass layoffs or plant closings which will result in a certain percentage of employees losing their jobs.
Covered Employers Under Federal Warn Act
Under federal WARN Act employers are covered in case they have at least one hundred full-time employees or at least one hundred employees who work a combined 4,000 hours or more per week.
Covered Employers Under California's Warn Act
According to California’s WARN Act employers are covered in case they own a commercial or industrial facility, which employs at least seventy-five employees.
Covered Layoffs Under Federal Warn Act
Mass layoffs are job cuts at a single work location. This can trigger specific legal requirements:
A reduction in force resulting in job loss at a single site of employment for hive hundred or more full-time employees.
Fifty to four hundred ninety-nine full-time employees, in case the number of employees laid off makes up at least 33% of the total number of employees.
Plant closing, which is defined as the shutdown of a single site of employment, or at least one operating unit or facility within a single site of employment, which results in job loss for fifty or more full-time employees during a thirty-day period.
Covered Layoffs Under California’s Warn Act
California law is applicable in the following cases:
Closing of a commercial or industrial facility with at least seventy-five employees
Layoff, defined as job loss for at least fifty employees in a thirty-day period.
Relocation of a commercial or industrial facility with at least seventy-five employees to a location at least one hundred miles away.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Failing to comply with the WARN Act or state layoff laws can have serious consequences, including:
Back Pay and Benefits: Employers may be liable for back pay and benefits for each day of violation.
Civil Penalties: Significant fines can impose for non-compliance.
Legal Fees: Employers may be responsible for the legal fees of employees who bring successful claims.
Reputational Damage: Negative publicity and damage to employee morale can result from non-compliance.
Beyond Legal Compliance: Ethical Considerations
While legal compliance is essential, ethical considerations should also guide your actions. Treat employees with dignity and respect throughout the process. Provide support and resources to help them transition to new opportunities.
Contact Us
Here at KAASS LAW, we strive to best serve our clients with the fullest extent. We also attempt to inform our readers and any potential clients to strive to learn more.
Plant closings and layoffs are complex events with significant legal and human implications. By understanding the applicable laws, seeking expert legal counsel, and prioritizing open communication and ethical treatment of employees, you can navigate this challenging process with greater confidence and minimize potential risks.
What Is the Income Time Period That Unemployment Benefits Are Based Upon?
In order to receive unemployment insurance benefits, you must meet state income and time worked requirements over a set period of time known as the "base period." In most states, your base period is a one-year period that includes the last four of the last five calendar quarters worked prior to filing your claim. When determining eligibility, your unemployment agency will most likely use a base period of these four full calendar quarters. If you file an unemployment claim between January and March, your base period is January to September of the previous year, as well as October to December of the year before. The base period for claims filed in April through June is January through December of the previous year. For July through September clams, a base period of April through December of the previous year and January through March of the current year is used. Finally, claims filed from October to December have a base period of the previous year's July to December and the current year's January to June.
How Much Money Can a Person Get for a Reduction in Hours?
Employees whose hours have been limited may be eligible for partial unemployment benefits, which are typically a portion of the pay they would have did receive if they were fully unemployed. Employees who quit due to a significant reduction in hours or pay may be eligible for unemployment benefits as well. According to the Employment Development Department, the first $25 or 25 percent of employee’s wages, whichever is the greater amount, is not wages earned and won’t be reduced from his UI weekly benefit amount.
Where Must a Person File for Unemployment Benefits in California?
The required information can be found here: https://www.edd.ca.gov/. Select “File & Manage a Claim” to apply for unemployment benefits. Through this link, a person can also learn about the appeals process, find current benefit amounts, eligibility requirements and more.
Glendale Personal Injury Lawyer
If you or a loved one are temporarily out of work due to no fault of their own, then you may be able to get compensation. If that is the case, contact our Glendale personal injury lawyer today for a consultation and case review. Please feel free to give our office a call at 310.943.1171.