According to California Penal Code Section 69 resisting an executive officer is illegal.
Furthermore, it is illegal to attempt, by means of any threat or violence, to prevent or deter an executive officer from performing his duty or intentionally resist, by the use of violence or force, such officer in performance of his duty.
Resisting Arrest under PC Section 148(a)
Though the crime is closely related to the crime of resisting arrest under PC Section 148(a), resisting an executive officer is considered a much more serious crime in California. Unlike resisting arrest PC 69, resisting an executive officer requires actual violence or a threat of violence.
Resisting an Executive Officer Covers Two Different Offenses
Resisting an Executive Officer covers two different offenses including
Intentionally and willfully attempting to prevent or deter an executive officer from performing his duties and
Resisting an executive officer in the performance of his duties by using violence or force.
Elements of the Crimes
Each of the two crimes has a separate set of elements that the prosecution must establish to convict the defendant.
The elements of attempting to deter an executive officer are the following:
Defendant unlawfully used violence or force for preventing or deterring an executive officer from performing his lawful duties
Defendant had intention to prevent or deter the executive officer from performing his duties
The elements of resisting an executive officer in the performance of his duties by using violence or force are the following:
Defendant used force to resist an officer
The executive officer was performing his lawful duty at the time
Defendant was aware that the executive officer was performing his duty
Violence or Force Under Penal Code Section 69
For purposes of PC Section 69, force does not need to cause an injury or harm to a person.
Therefore, even touching in an offensive or rude manner will be enough to constitute violence. However, in order for violence to be a PC Section 69 violation, it must actually deter or prevent an officer from performing his lawful duty.
What is An Executive Officer?
An Executive Officer is any governmental official who is authorized to use his discretion to carry out a lawful duty.
Examples of Executive Officers
Examples of executive officers include:
Law enforcement officers such as police officers sheriff’s deputies
Judges
Elected officials
District attorneys
Public defenders
The lawful duties of an executive officer’s are those ones that he is tasked with performing as a requirement of his profession.
Defenses for California Penal Code 69 Charges
Defenses for California Penal Code 69 charges include the following
No intent
For convicting defendant of this crime, the prosecutor must prove that he indented to resist or prevent the executive officer from performing his duties. Thus, it a valid defense if there is no evidence that shows defendant's intention when he acted in such manner.
Unlawful conduct
In case the defendant was attempting to prevent an executive officer’s conduct that was unlawful, he can't be found guilty of the offense, as executive officer is not protected while performing unlawful or illegal conduct.
Self-defense
In case the executive officer was using illegal force against defendant, he was entitled to exercise his right to defend himself by using reasonable force.
Penalties for Violating California Penal Code Section 69
In California a crime of resisting an executive officer is a "wobbler" which can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the case circumstances and defendant's criminal history.
Penalties for Misdemeanor Penal Code 69 Conviction
Penalties for misdemeanor Penal Code 69 conviction are the following:
Up to one year in a county jail
A fine up to maximum $10,000
Penalties for Felony Penal Code 69 Conviction
Penalties for Felony Penal Code 69 conviction are the following:
16 months, two or three years in a county jail
A fine up to maximum $10,000
Criminal Defense Lawyer in Glendale, CA
Do you or a loved one require legal assistance in California? Get in touch with the experienced lawyers in Los Angeles, CA, at KAASS LAW now.Our law firm takes pride in providing the best services we possibly can for all of our clients.
According to California Penal Code 136.1 it is illegal to prevent or to attempt to prevent any witnesses or victims of a crime from testifying or reporting or about the crime.
What Must the Prosecutor Establish in Penal Code 136.1 Charges?
Prosecutor must establish the following elements for proving an allegation of intimidating a witness or victim under Penal Code 136.1:
Defendant intentionally and maliciously prevented or dissuaded, or attempted to prevent or dissuade a victim or a witness of a crime from
Appearing at or giving testimony during any legal proceeding
Reporting the crime to law authorities
Assisting with the prosecution process
Assisting in the arrest process
"Acting Maliciously" According to California Penal Code 136.1
Defendant acts maliciously when he illegally intends to harm, annoy or injure another person in any way, or intends to interfere in any way with the orderly administration of justice. In regards to PC Section 136.1 prosecutor must prove that defendant acted with the intention of dissuading a witness or victim from reporting or testifying or a crime. In case the victim or witness is a family member and defendant dissuaded them for their own protection, then PC Section 136.1 PC stipulates that the court must assume that defendant didn’t act maliciously.
California Penal Code 422(a) prohibits any person who intentionally threatens to commit a crime that will result in great bodily injury or death to another, with the specific intent that the statement is to be taken as a threat, even if the person does not have actual intent to carry it out. Previously this offense was called “terrorist threats,” though it can include any threats of harm or violence.
Elements of Penal Code 422(a) Making Criminal Threats
Prosecutor must establish the following elements for proving that the defendant is guilty of making criminal threats:
Defendant intentionally threatened to illegally cause great bodily injury or kill another person
Defendant made the threat in person, in writing, or by electronic means. Threats might be expressed through a telephone call, a computer, a video recorder or a text.
Defendant intended that his statement be assumed as a threat
The threat was so immediate, clear, specific and unconditional that it communicated to another person immediate prospect that it would be carried out
Another person was reasonably feared for his safety or for the safety of his immediate family.
According to California Penal Code 273a, child endangerment is crime that involves putting a child into a dangerous situation or allowing another person to do so, without taking reasonable steps to protect him from injury and harm.
Elements of California Penal Code 273a Child Endangerment
Prosecutor must establish the following elements to prove that defendant committed child endangerment.
Defendant willfully imposed unjustifiable mental suffering or physical pain on a child, caused such suffering or pain or allowed such suffering or pain to occur when the child was in his custody.
Defendant acted in a way that was likely to produce great bodily injury or death upon a child
Defendant was criminally negligent
Defendant did not act reasonably while disciplining the child.
Willfully means on purpose or willingly. It does not necessarily mean that defendant specifically had intention to cause harm or violate the law
Unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering is pain or suffering which is not reasonably necessary or excessive under the circumstances.
Under California Vehicle Code 2800.1 evading arrest is defined as attempting or actively running away from a police officer that has made clear his intentions to arrest you.
Defendant May Be Found Guilty of Vehicle Code 2800.1 Evading a Police Officer If
The prosecutor must establish the following elements in order to convict a defendant of Vehicle Code 2800.1 evading a police officer:
Police officer in a motor vehicle was pursuing the defendant. It makes no difference whether the police officer was driving a patrol car or riding on a police bike or a motorcycle.
Defendant was also driving a vehicle when he intentionally fled, or tried to evade the pursuing police
And all of the following were true:
At least one lit red lamp was visible from the front of the police officer’s vehicle
Defendant either saw or reasonably should have seen the red light
According to California Penal Code 647.6 it is unlawful to molest or annoy a minor under the age of 18 while motivated by an abnormal or unnatural sexual interest in the minor.
What Elements Must Prosecutor Establish to Convict a Defendant of Penal Code 647.6
The prosecutor must establish the following elements for convicting a defendant of Penal Code 647.6 annoying or molesting a child
Defendant engaged in unlawful conduct directed at a minor
Defendant’s conduct without hesitation would have disturb, irritate, offend or injure a normal person
Defendant’s conduct was motivated by an abnormal or unnatural sexual interest in the minor
At the time of the conduct the minor was under the age of 18
Conduct Considered as "Annoying or Molesting a Minor"
Annoying a child according to California Penal Code Section 647.6 PC meets the following requirements:
Defendant’s behavior was driven by a sexual interest in a minor
Defendant’s behavior attacked a minor’s safety and privacy
According to California Penal Code section 646.9 stalking; a defendant is guilty of the crime of stalking if he intentionally, maliciously and repeatedly follows or harasses another person and makes a credible threat with the intent to place that person in reasonable fear for his safety or the safety of his immediate family.
Prosecutor Must Establish the Following to Convict Defendant of Penal Code 646.9 Stalking
Prosecutor must establish the following elements in order to successfully convict a defendant of stalking under Penal Code 646.9
Defendant intentionally, maliciously and repeatedly harassed or followed another person;
Defendant made a credible threat to that person’s safety ; and
Defendant did so with intention to place another person in a reasonable fear for his safety or for the safety of his immediate family
Stalking Penal Code 646.9: Credible Threat
Credible threat is the one that makes a target person to reasonably fear for his safety or for the safety of a family member. Credible threat can be made in writing, verbally, electronically or in any other way that communicates the threat to a target person. It does not matter whether person actually had intention to carry out the threat or not, it is only important that he was able to carry out the threat.
Under California Penal Code 115 filing a false document states, anyone who intentionally procures or offers a false or forged instrument to be filed, registered, or recorded in a California public office is guilty of a felony crime.
The Element "To Offer" in California Penal Code Section 115 Charges
"To offer” means to cause or present the document to a government agency, but the document does not actually need to be filed for being convicted of violating California Penal Code Section 115.
Prosecutor Must Establish The Following to Convict Defendant Under PC Section 115
Prosecutor must establish the following element for convicting a person under PC Section 115.
Defendant either offered or procured a document for filing, recording or registration with any public office in California
Defendant was aware that the document was false or forged when filed it
Defendant intentionally altered or misrepresented factual information such as monetary amounts, prices, description of events, ownership, etc with intention to defraud another person
According to Penal Code 25850 PC, it’s illegal to carry a loaded firearm on a person or in a vehicle while in any public place or on any public street in an incorporated city or in any public place or on any public street in a prohibited area of unincorporated territory.
Prosecutor Must Establish the Following Elements to Convict Defendant of Carrying a Loaded Firearm
The prosecutor must establish the following elements to successfully convict a defendant of carrying a loaded firearm under Penal Code 25850:
The defendant carried a loaded firearm on his person or in a vehicle;
The defendant was aware that he was carrying a firearm
Defendant was in a public place where it was unlawful to discharge a firearm.
Definition of Firearm for Purposes of Penal Code 25850 PC
California Penal Code 25850 PC defines a firearm as any device designed to be used as a weapon, from which a projectile is expelled through a barrel by the force of any explosion or other form of combustion. A firearm includes flare handguns, guns, shotguns, rockets, rifles, zip guns, and assault rifles.
Definition of Loaded Firearm for Purposes of Penal Code 25850 PC
Carbon Monoxide, also known by its chemical abbreviation (CO), is a gas comprised of one part carbon and another part oxide. Carbon monoxide is a colorless and odorless gas which exposure can lead to serious illness or death. The most common causes of the wrongful death from Carbon Monoxide poisoning are improperly ventilated generators, stoves, fireplaces and water heaters. According to the California Air Resources Board carbon monoxide poisoning causes death from thirty to forty people each year
California Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Prevention Act
The primary law in California which protects victims from Carbon Monoxide Poisoning is California's Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Prevention Act of 2010, which requires carbon monoxide detectors to be installed in every dwelling unit intended for human occupancy. According to the Act all residential property that have a non-electric heater, non-electric appliance or have a fireplace, are required to install carbon monoxide detectors.
The California Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Prevention Law Provides That
All single-family homes, including individually-owned condominiums, (owner or tenant occupied) must be equipped with a detector on or before July 1, 2011.
Preventing or Dissuading Witness from Testifying or Reporting Crime in California
It is not important whether defendant was successful in his attempt to prevent, dissuade or intimidate a victim or witness. Even if the defendant’s attempt was unsuccessful he still violated California Penal Code Section 136.1 PC.
Using Force or Threat in Penal Code 136.1 Charges
In case the defendant used or threatened to use force against the victim or witness, he will be considered guilty. It doesn't matter whether someone actually suffered or not, the crime is concerned with the defendant's acts and not with the result of those acts. If the force was actually used that will be an aggravating factor with additional three to six-year state prison sentence.
“Witness” is a person who is aware about the facts of a crime, whose declaration under oath may be considered as evidence, who has reported a crime, or has been served with a subpoena.
“Victim” is a person against whom a crime is being or has been committed
Penalties for a Penal Code 136.1 Conviction?
Penalties for violating California Penal Code 136.1 can be charged as a misdemeanor or a felony and are as follows.
Penalties for a Misdemeanor Penal Code 136.1 Conviction
Penalties for misdemeanor Penal Code 136.1 conviction are the following:
Up to one year in a county jail
A fine up to $1,000
Ten-year restriction on the right to own or acquire firearms
Penalties for a Felony Penal Code 136.1 Conviction
Penalties for felonyPenal Code 136.1 conviction are the following:
From 16 months to four years sentence in California state prison
A fine up to $10,000
Lifetime restriction on owning or acquiring firearms
Sentencing Enhancement for Personal Use of a Firearm
In case the defendant used or was armed with a gun while attempting to dissuade a witness or victim he will receive additional one to ten-year state prison sentence.
California's Criminal Street Gang Enhancement: PC Section 186.22
In case defendant is convicted of violating Penal Code Section 136.1"for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang" California's gang enhancement automatically imposes an additional and consecutive seven-year-to-life prison sentence.
Glendale Criminal Defense Lawyer
If you are a loved one has been charged with violating Penal Code 136.1 contact our Glendale criminal defense lawyer today at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
"Intention" Element in Making Criminal Threats Charges
The intention to hurt, injure or kill another person is the most important element of the offense. Even if defendant did not have intention to commit the crime, just threatening to cause a serious injury or to kill will be considered enough for being charged with the crime of criminal threat.
"Fear" Element in Making Criminal Threats Charges
Another important element of the crime is fear. According to the law for convicting defendant of criminal threat the victim should be placed in an actual fear and believe that the threat is credible. There should be no criminal threat charges in case the victim never showed any fear or did not appear to be scared.
Conditional and Empty Threat
Though according to Penal Code Section 422 a threat must be “so unequivocal, unconditional, specific and immediate as to convey to the person threatened”, still some specific empty or conditional threats can be qualified as criminal offenses.
To be considered a conditional threat, a threat should be formulated to reflect a certain condition. Conditional threats are considered criminal threats when there is a clear intent and possibility of performing them in case the victims doesn’t meet the stated conditions. For example a threat to kill a person after getting out of prison is a conditional threat.
California Blackmail and Extortion Laws
Under extortion laws conditional threats can be identified as a blackmail or extortion, which can increase penalties for criminal threats.
The empty threats are those ones that the person who is giving them does not intend to perform them but wants to make the victim scare. But in the face of the criminal threats prosecution, it’s irrelevant whether or not the individual has real intention to perform the threat. It is only important that a person conveys the threat in a credible manner so that the victim reasonably believes in it.
Legal Defenses to California Penal Code Section 422(a) charges
Some legal defenses to California Penal Code Section 422(a) charges include the following
Unreasonable Threat Defense
In case the victim feels or does not feel threatened but the fear is unreasonable, then the defendant should not be considered guilty of this offense. Threat must be real and reasonable with the possibility to take place. So if it was unreasonable to perform the threat under certain circumstances it doesn’t important whether the victim actually feared a threat or not.
False Accusation Defense
False accusation takes place when defendant is charged of a crime in a dishonest manner. Some people who are spiteful, angry or vengeful are able to falsely accuse another one for punishing him. Usually this kind of situation appears when the threat was verbal with no written or electronic evidence.
The Victim was Not Feared Defense
Fear is an important element in this crime and in case the defendant’s threat didn’t place the victim in fear then there is no criminal threats violation.
Penalties for California Penal Code 422(a) Making Criminal Threats
Penalties for violating California Penal Code Section 422(a) can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony. Under Penal Code Section 422 PC criminal threat is considered a wobbler and can be charged as either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the case circumstances and the defendant’s criminal history.
California Penalties for a Misdemeanor Making Criminal Threats Conviction
Penalties for Penal Code 433(a) Making Criminal Threats for a misdemeanor conviction are the following:
Up to one year in a county jail
A fine up to $1,000
California Penalties for a Felony Making Criminal Threats Conviction
Penalties for Penal Code 433(a) Making Criminal Threats for a felony conviction are the following:
Up to three years in California state prison
A fine up to $10,000
The defendant will receive additional and consecutive one-year in the state prison in case he used a dangerous or deadly weapon for communicating the threat.
Three Strikes Law
Under California’s Three Strikes Law this offense is a strike and can be used to enhance the penalties on future convictions. The defendant must serve at least 85% of his sentence before he will be eligible for release on parole.
Glendale Criminal Defense Lawyer
If you are a loved one has been charged with violating Penal Code 422(a) Making Criminal Threats contact our Glendale criminal defense lawyer at KAASS Law today at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Criminal negligence is more than just inattention or carelessness. Defendant can be found to be criminally negligent if:
He acted in a reckless way that created a high risk of great bodily injury or death upon a child
A reasonable person would have known that acting that way would probably and normally result in harm to a child.
Great bodily injury is a significant or substantial injury. Jury determines on an individual case-by-case basis the existence of great bodily injury. It is important to mention that unlike child abuse crime child endangerment crime doesn’t require that a child to actually suffer an injury. Any unjustifiable mental or physical harm to a child can result in a child endangerment charge.
Examples of Child Endangerment
Some examples of conduct including in the child endangerment
Negligently leaving a child with a person who has a history of abusive behavior
Leaving dangerous firearms unlocked and loaded within a child’s reach
Failing to get medical treatment for an injured or sick child
Involving a child in drugs transportation, manufacture or sale
Driving under the influence
Penalties for California Child Endangerment
The punishment for violation of PC 273 mainly depends on whether or not the defendant's acts created a risk of great bodily harm or death to the child.
Misdemeanor Penalties for California Child Endangerment
Misdemeanor penalties for California Child Endangerment may include:
Up to 12 months in a county jai
A fine up to $1,000
Minimum 4 years of misdemeanor probation
Completion of a 12-month Child abuser treatment program
Possible issuance of a protective order to keep the defendant away from the child
Felony Penalties for California Child Endangerment
Felony penalties for child endangerment can include:
Two, four or six years in a state prison
A fine up to $10,000
Minimum 4 years of formal probation
Completion of a 12-month Child abuser treatment program
Possible issuance of a protective order to keep the defendant away from the child
A "strike" on defendant's record under California's "Three Strikes" law
Sentencing Enhancement for Causing Great Bodily Injury in Child Endangerment Cases
Sentencing Enhancements for causing great bodily injury in California child endangerment cases
Defendant will receive an additional and consecutive three to six years in prison in case he personally and actually caused great bodily injury on the child, or
Defendant will receive an additional and consecutive four years in prison in case the child died as a result of the defendant's criminal negligence
Glendale Criminal Defense Lawyer
If you are a loved one has been charged with violating California Penal Code 273a, child endangerment contact our Glendale criminal defense lawyer today at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Evading a police officer is known a specific intent crime, meaning that the defendant must have specifically intention to commit the offense and it is a willful act. In case the defendant fled from the police officer for a reason other than willfully and intentionally disobeying the officer’s orders, then you cannot be found guilty of the offense. The defendant doesn’t need to have intent to break the law, gain an advantage or hurt another person.
Requirements for the "Police Officer’s Car" in VC 2800.1 Charges
California Vehicle Code Section 2800.1 enumerates some specific requirements that a police officer’s car must have. The requirements are the following:
Vehicle must have at least one lighted red lamp
Vehicle must have at least one siren which the officer is sounding as reasonably necessary
In addition to the red lamp and siren the vehicle must be distinctively marked as a police vehicle. Particularly it must have at least the name or seal of the police department on the outside of the car, or visible flashing white or blue lights visible to the driver.
Legal Defenses to Evading a Police Officer Under VC 2800.1
Legal defenses to evading a police officer under VC Section 2800.1 are as follows
No willful intent
According to California Vehicle Code Section 2800.1 anyone who willfully flees or attempts to evade a peace officer is guilty of a misdemeanor. In case the defendant did not intent to evade police officer he should not be convicted of the crime.
Insufficient evidence
Vehicle Code Section 2800.1 requires the police officer be reasonably identifiable by wearing a standard police uniform. Also his vehicle must have distinctive markings, at least one red lamp visible from the front and a siren. If any of these elements are not met the defense of insufficient evidence can be applicable.
Penalties for Violating California Vehicle Code 2800.1
In California law violation of VC 2800.1 is charged as a misdemeanor and the potential penalties include:
Up to one year in a county jail
A fine of up to $1,000
Vehicle impoundment for up to 30 days
Misdemeanor probation
Driver’s license suspension
Glendale Criminal Defense Lawyer
If you are a loved one has been charged with violating California Vehicle Code 2800.1 contact our Glendale criminal defense lawyer today at (310) 943-1171 for a free consultation.
Under the Penal Code Section 647.6, the words “molest” and “annoy” refer to the same behavior and actions.
Penal Code 647.6 is Classified as a General Intent Crime
California Penal Code Section 647.6 classifies annoying a child as a “general intent” crime, so the prosecutor does not need to prove that defendant intended to be sexually inappropriate in his behavior. If defendant’s behavior could irritate or disturb another person he can be convicted of committing this crime. Furthermore the child does not actually need to be irritated or disturbed by the defendant’s conduct. According to PC annoying a child charges are examined by what so called “objective test”, when the court only looks at the nature of the behavior itself, but not the result of the behavior.
Difference Between PC 647.6 and Other California Sex Crimes
According to California Penal Code 647.6 PC it is not necessary that the defendant touch the child’s body. The difference between other sex crimes is that crime of annoying a child can be just by using words that could be construed as annoying.
Driven by sexual interest
To convict defendant under California Penal Code 647.6 PC prosecutor must prove that he didn’t only have committed an inappropriate act towards a minor, but also the act was driven by a sexual interest in a child. So in case the defendant’s behavior was driven by other than sexual interest, then he did not commit an annoying a child crime.
Penalties for Child Molestation Conviction in California
Penalties and punishments for a Child Molestation conviction in California can be tried as either a misdemeanor or felony in Caliofrnia
Punishments for Misdemeanor Child Molestation Conviction in California Under Penal Code 647.6
In situations where the defendant has no aggravating factors, the first offense under PC Section 647.6 PC is a misdemeanor with the following penalties:
Up to one year in a county jail
A fine of up to $5,000
Penal Code Section 647.6 Wobbler Offense
California Penal Code Section 647.6 becomes a wobbler in case defendant annoyed a minor after entering inhabited dwelling house, inhabited part of a structure or a trailer coach without consent. If convicted as a misdemeanor under Penal Code 647.6(b), defendant will face the same above mentioned punishment.
Punishments for Felony Child Molestation Conviction in California
If convicted as a felony the punishment will be 16 months, 2 or 3 years in California state prison. If the defendant has prior Child Molestation Conviction under Penal Code 647.6, the conviction will be charged as a felony. Defendant will receive up to three years in California state prison for a second or subsequent conviction for annoying or molesting a child.
Child Molestation Charge with Prior Felony Conviction
In case the defendant has prior felony conviction for certain specified sex offense then violation of Penal Code 647.6 will be charged as a felony, punishable by two, four, or six years in state prison. The list of such offenses includes, but is not limited to:
Rape of a minor under 16 - Penal Code Section 261
Continuous sexual abuse of a child - Penal Code Section 288.5
Lewd acts with a child Penal Code Section 288
Child pornography- Penal Code Section 311.4
Probation
If the judge believes that the defendant doesn’t present any danger to children, the punishment can be probation instead of jail or prison time. There are two types of probations the defendant might receive, depending on whether he was convicted of a felony or misdemeanor.
Misdemeanor or informal probation can last from 1 to 5 years, with the requirement to pay fines and do some community service/labor. Additionally, defendant will be required to appear before the judge at specified times.
Felony or formal probation can last from 3 to 5 years, with the requirement to regularly meet with a probation officer, pay restitution to the victim and comply with other conditions. Additionally, the judge can sentence the defendant to 1 year in a county jail. In case the defendant violates the conditions and terms and of formal probation, the judge can place him in a state prison.
Registration as a sex offender
Defendant will be required to register as a sex offender for violating Penal Code 647.6 PC. The information about him and his offence will be available for the public to see on the Department of Justice’s Meghan’s Law website.
Harassing means willfully engaging in a course of conduct directed at an exact person that seriously alarms, annoys, terrorizes or torments the person with no legitimate purpose. A course of conduct means continuing acts occurring over a certain period of time.
What is a Malicious Act?
Malicious act is a wrongful act done with the intention of annoying injuring, or disturbing another person in an illegal way.
Common Examples of Stalking Under California Penal Code 646.9
Here are some common examples of stalking under California Penal Code 646.9 include
Repeatedly making harassing phone calls to another person
Repeatedly showing up at a another person’s business or home
Repeatedly following another person
Repeatedly sending messages, notes or objects to another person
Vandalizing another person’s property
Stalking Against an Intimate Partner: California Domestic Violence Laws
In situations where the stalking acts are committed against an intimate partner the crime will be addressed under California domestic violence laws. A victim of stalking in California can file a domestic violence TRO against the defendant. This factor can lead to harsher punishment and penalties. An intimate partner can include:
A fiancé
A current or former spouse
A current or former cohabitating partner
Child’s parent
A person you are or were dating
Penalties for Violating California Penal Code Section 646.9
According to PC 646.9 stalking is considered a wobbler and can be prosecuted either as a misdemeanor or a felony crime, depending on the defendant’s criminal history and specific facts of the case. Though there are some situations when the crime of stalking will be automatically charged as a felony:
The crime was committed in violation of an existing court protective order
The defendant had been previously convicted of Penal Code Section 646.9 stalking
Penalties for Misdemeanor Stalking Penal Code 646.9 Conviction
Penalties for a misdemeanor stalking conviction under Penal Code 646.9 include the following
Up to one year in a county jail
A fine up to $1,000
Probation
Mandatory counseling or commitment to a hospital that can treat defendant for mental illness
Restraining order that prohibits any contact with the victim
Penalties for Felony Stalking Penal Code 646.9 Conviction
Penalties for a felony stalking conviction under Penal Code 646.9 include the following:
Sixteen months to five years in California State Prison
A fine up to$1,000
Formal probation
Mandatory counseling or commitment to a hospital that can treat defendant for mental illness
Restraining order that prohibits any contact with the victim
Registration as a California sex offender under PC Section 290
Aggravating Factors in California Criminal Stalking Cases
In case the circumstances of the crime meet certain aggravating factors the prison sentence may be increased. Here are some common aggravating factors:
Great bodily harm
In case the defendant caused great bodily harm to the victim he can be sentences to additional and consecutive 3 to 5 years in state prison.
Weapon Enhancement
In case at the time of committing a crime the defendant was carrying a weapon he can be sentenced to additional and consecutive 1 to 3 years in state prison.
California Criminal Stalking Defense Lawyer
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 646.9 charges or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California stalking defense lawyers give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
The document, if genuine, was one which could be legally filed
Examples of False or Forged Documents for Purposes of Penal Code 115
Though the crime of filing false instruments is most often associated with filing of false property deeds in connection with real estate fraud, California Penal Code Section 115 applies to almost any type of document filed with a state government office. Here are some common examples of forged instruments.
Bail bonds
Tax returns and income statements
Lien for money
Bank account records
Fishing records
Personal checks
Identification cards and birth certificates
Immigration documents
What are the Penalties for California Penal Code 115 Conviction?
Under California Penal Code 115, filing a false document is a felony. In case the defendant filled or recorded multiple documents, he can be charged with separate counts of California Penal Code 115 violations for each document, even if the documents had similar matters or were closely related. The potential penalties for each count are the following:
Sixteen months, two or three years in state prison
A fine of up to $10,000
Felony probation
Situations where Defendant Wont Be Given Probation in Penal Code 115 Cases
The defendant won’t be given probation under Penal Code 115 PC in Cases where
He had previously been convicted for violating PC Section 115 or
One instance of filing of false or forged documents caused more than $100,000 damages to the victim
Sentencing Enhancements for Penal Code Section 115 PC
In some particular circumstances the defendant can receive additional punishments to the sentence, known as "Sentencing Enhancements":
The defendant can face an additional fine of up to $75,000 in case the forged or false document affected or encumbered the title or mortgage to a single family residence with up to four residential units.
The defendant can face an additional sentence of one to four years if a victim is harmed by a loss of more than $65,000 and the prosecution can prove that he intended to cause such a loss.
Can a Defendant Face Aggravated White Collar Crime Enhancement in Penal Code 115 Charges?
Defendant can also face an aggravated white collar crime enhancement, in case:
He was already convicted for two or more felonies connected with fraud related crimes
He committed felonies against two or more victims or against one victim but on more than one occasion
Felonies represent a pattern of criminal conduct
His actions brought more than $100,000 damage to victims
What Are the Penalties for Aggravated White Collar Crime Enhancement
The penalties for aggravated white collar crime enhancement are the following:
Additional one to five 5 years in state prison
A fine up to $500,000 in fines or double the amount of the fraud, whichever is greater
Penal Code 115(a) Filing A False Document Defense Lawyer
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 115(a) charges or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
Under Penal Code 25850 PC a firearm is loaded when there is an unexpended cartridge consisting of a case that holds a charge of powder and a bullet. Even if the firearm is not capable of being fired, it can still be considered loaded if it fits within the above characteristics. If a person carries a gun in a public place, a peace officer has the right to examine whether it is loaded or not.
Who is Eligible to Carry a Loaded Firearm in Public in California?
There is a number of individuals who are exempted from the prohibitions against carrying a loaded firearm in public.
Peace officers, active or honorably retired
Peace officers from another state, who are performing official activities in California
Federal law enforcement agents or officers
Members of the armed forces
POST certification (animal control persons, zookeepers, harbor police)
Legitimate hunters
Persons who conceal weapons permit
Security guard and private investigators
Some individuals from the list are only eligible to carry a loaded firearm under certain conditions. For example, hunters can carry loaded firearms to a designated hunting location if they are in a locked container. Target shooters can carry loaded guns at the target range areas.
Defenses to California Penal Code Section 25850 Charges
Defenses to California Penal Code Section 25850 charges include the following
The defendant was unaware of the presence of the firearm
Usually, this defense applies when the defendant was not carrying the gun on his person. For example, if someone left a gun in his vehicle or in a bag that he was carrying. If the defendant did not know that he was carrying a loaded firearm, he cannot be found guilty of a violation of California PC Section 25850.
The firearm was not loaded
This law requires the firearm to be loaded. In case the clip was not attached or there was no bullet in the chambers, a person cannot be found guilty of this offense under Penal Code Section 25850.
The defendant was not in a public place or a prohibited area
For being convicted under PC 25850 defendant must have carried the loaded firearm in a public place, a prohibited area, or in an incorporated area. In case he carried the firearm in a private area he cannot be found guilty.
Self-Defense
According to California’s self-defense law, a person can carry a loaded firearm in case he reasonably believes that he or any other person is in imminent danger, and carrying the firearm is necessary for deflecting the threat.
What are the Penalties for California Penal Code Section 25850 Conviction?
Penalties for California Penal Code Section 25850 conviction can be either charged as a misdemeanor or felony and is also considered a "wobbler" offense in California.
What are the Penalties for Misdemeanor Penal Code 25850 Conviction?
The penalties for a misdemeanor Penal Code Section 25850 carrying a loaded firearm include:
Up to one year in county jail;
A fine of up to $1,000; and/or
Probation
Is Penal Code Section 25850 Considered a Wobbler Offense in California?
In California Penal Code Section 25850 is considered a wobbler offense. Depending on certain aggravating circumstances and particular circumstances of the case, carrying a loaded firearm can become a wobbler and can be prosecuted as either a felony or a misdemeanor. The aggravating circumstances are the following:
Previous misdemeanor conviction against a person or a property
Previous misdemeanor conviction involving a narcotic or dangerous drug,
The loaded gun was not registered with the Department of Justice.
Penalties for Misdemeanor with Aggravating Factors Are the Same as for a Regular Misdemeanor
Penalties for a misdemeanor with aggravating factors are the same as for a regular misdemeanor. Penalties for a felony conviction under aggravating factors are the following:
16 months, 2 or 3 years in county jail; and/or
A fine of up to $1,000
What are the Penalties for Felony Penal Code 25850 Conviction?
Penal Code lists other aggravating circumstances that elevate a Penal Code 25850 PC to a felony. These aggravating circumstances are the following:
The defendant had previous convictions for a felony or any other gun offense
The defendant had reason to believe that the gun he owned was stolen
Defendant unlawfully possessed the firearm or was otherwise prohibited to own it
The defendant was an active participant in a criminal street gang.
Penalties for Felony Penal Code 25850 Include
Penalties for felony Penal Code 25850 conviction include:
16 months, 2 years, or 3 years in county jail; and/or
A fine of up to $10,000
Prior Firearm Convictions Enhancement
The defendant must also serve a minimum of three months in county jail if he has a prior conviction for shooting at an inhabited dwelling house or car (PC 246), assault with a deadly weapon (PC 254), and brandishing a weapon (PC 417).
Penal Code 25850 Defense Lawyer
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Penal Code 25850 charges or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
All other residential units must be equipped with a detector on or before January 1, 2013
Carbon Monoxide Detector
CO device is designed to detect carbon monoxide and produce a distinct audible alarm. Carbon monoxide device provides a vital, low-cost and highly effective protection against carbon monoxide poisoning. It can be battery powered or plug-in devices with battery backup. The detector must be certified pursuant to the requirements of Underwriters Laboratories Inc. (UL) and the American National standards Institute (ANSI).
California’s Building Code: Carbon Monoxide Should Be Installed
According to California’s Building Code Carbon Monoxide devices are required be installed outside of each separate sleeping area, however for maximum security the State Fire Marshal’s Office recommends to have a CO detector in each sleeping room. CO devices are also required to be installed in garages, basements and on each level of a multi-level home. In hotels, motels, and boarding houses the device must be placed in a sleeping unit that has a fuel-burning appliance. Because Carbon Monoxide is lighter than air and can be found with warm, rising air, detectors must be placed on a wall about five feet above the floor. The detectors can be placed on the ceiling far from a fireplace or flame-producing appliance.
Health and Safety Code Section 17926.1 CO Detectors
Health and Safety Code Section 17926.1 particularly applies the requirements of the Act to landlords who rent dwelling units to tenants. According to the Act, CO devices shall be operable when the tenant takes possession of the unit. Landlords can enter units for purposes of maintaining or installing CO detectors with notice pursuant to California Civil Code Section 1954. Tenants are required to inform the landlords if the CO device is deactivate or is not operating properly. In case CO device or its batteries were unplugged or removed and the owner was not informed, the owner is not in violation of the law.
Violations of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Prevention Act can lead to a maximum fine of $200. However property owners will be given a thirty-day notice to correct as a chance to avoid the fine.