Health and Safety 11365 Presence During Unlawful Controlled Substance Use
Health and safety code 11365 governs unlawful presence during unlawful controlled substance use. Getting arrested for HS 11365 can feel a lot like, being in the wrong place, at the wrong time.
Life is full of surprises, some good and some that just cause headaches. The law, on the other hand, is designed to be as unsurprising as possible. It has clear cut guidelines for what is, and what isn’t, legal. However, how the law gets used against you is another matter entirely. What could have been an honest mistake or an unfortunate coincidence can be damning in some respects of the law and California Health and Safety Code 11365 is one such law.
HS 11365 Charged as a Misdemeanor
HS 11365 states that it is a misdemeanor to willingly and knowingly be somewhere that controlled substances are being used, given that you actually helped out or supported that usage. The law itself is sound, but many problems arise when this particular law is put into effect. This is because one can get charged with violating HS 11365 without ever having possessing any controlled substance or been under their influence. The way this typically works is that you may get arrested if you happened to be somewhere where controlled substance were being used; in practice this means that people can get charged with an HS 11365 violation for simply being in the wrong place, at the wrong time.
What Does The Prosecution Have to Prove to Be Convicted of HS 11365?
Technical elements constitute the legal definition of presence during unlawful use of controlled substances, which means that for the HS 11365 charges to hold, the following five elements must be true:
- You freely and willingly chose to visit a place where someone was using a controlled substance,
- You had knowledge that the person(s) intended to use the controlled substance,
- You meant to help or support the other person in using the controlled substance,
- You said or did something that did help them, and
- You would have known that your actions and words helped them to use the controlled substance.
Therefore, while HS 11365 has wording that focuses primarily around the idea of someone being ‘present’ while the use is happening, there is actually to show than merely being at the scene of the crime. You would additionally have to take an action or say something that helps or abets the use of the controlled substance.
Lending a ‘Helping Hand’ isn’t Always a Good Thing
To understand what ‘helping’ or ‘encouraging’ use of a controlled substance means in legal terms, we must know that it entails these critical points:
- You knew or strongly suspected the person(s) wanted to use a controlled substance,
- You specifically meant to help, encourage, support, instigate, or oversee the use of the controlled substance,
- You did actually help, encourage, support, instigate, or oversee the use of the controlled substance.
Clearly, there are a lot of principles and points that a violator of this statute would have to meet. To better illustrate these in a more real-world situation, let’s consider to different scenarios which may end with two very different results.
Examples of HS 11365 Charges
The following are examples of HS 11365 charges and how they might play out in court.
Violating HS 11365 Example 1
In the first scenario, suppose you went to a party with some friends where some people were snorting coke. You notice and become aware that some people are doing coke, but you choose not to say or do anything about it. You are clearly uneasy and you walk away whenever someone offers you a chance to do a line yourself. Given this scenario, you would not be found guilty of violating HS 11365 because even though you were present at a venue where drugs were being used, you did nothing to help or encourage the use of those drugs, nor did you partake in it yourself.
Violating HS 11365 Example 2
Conversely, let’s say the scene played out a bit differently. You’re still at a party with your friends where some people are using coke. Throughout the night, you dance with someone and have a few drinks with them. You take a liking to them and want to see them after the party. One of their friends interrupts by offering some coke. The person you liked looks at you for approval and you, not wanting to be a buzzkill, encourage them to go ahead and have fun. If that person then goes ahead and takes a hit of coke, then you may later be found guilty of violating HS 11365 since you encouraged the use of a controlled substance while at a place where they were being used.
What is a Controlled Substance?
California Health and Safety Code 11365 applies solely to a select group of ‘controlled substance’. These substances are:
- Cocaine, cocaine base, or coke,
- Heroin,
- Methamphetamine,
- Mescalin,
- Peyote,
- Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid, or GHB.
As you may have noticed, marijuana is ostentatiously absent from the list. This is because California’s HS 11365 law does not apply to marijuana and thus you cannot be guilty of violating HS 11365 if you are present and encourage marijuana use.
Penalties Health and Safety Code 11365 Charges
As we alluded to at the beginning, knowingly being in a place where controlled substances are used is considered a misdemeanor. As such, the potential consequences are:
- Summary probation, which typically includes a condition that you must successfully finish a drug treatment program,
- A maximum of 6 months in county jail, and/or,
- A fine of no more than $1,000.
Deferred Entry of Judgement Program for Health and Safety Code 11365 Conviction
It is imperative to keep in mind that even if you are convicted of being present at the time of controlled substance use under Health and Safety Code 11365, you may still be eligible for California’s ‘deferred entry of judgement’ or pretrial diversion program. In a nutshell, deferred entry of judgement suspends the charged placed against you while you complete a state-approved drug rehabilitation program. Upon successfully finishing it, the charges get dismissed. However, to qualify for this option, there are some requirements. For example, you typically will need to have no previous controlled substance related charges and the charges need to not have involved violence.
Defenses to California Health and Safety Code 11365
There are a few legal defenses to California Health and Safety Code 11365. Despite possibly having the option of drug diversion, sometimes it may be far more sensible to fight the charges that are posed against you directly. This is typically done by using some of the common legal defenses, such as lack of knowledge.
As an example, if you weren’t aware of the illegal controlled substance use, and/or had no knowledge that your actions or words may have indirectly encouraged use of those substance, then you are not guilty of helping or supporting the use of controlled substances, even if you were present at the location. Alternatively, another method is to argue that you flat did not say or do anything to aid or support someone in using the controlled substance. These are just two of the many possible ways of defending an HS 11365 case.
We Can Help Defend You
For answers to any other questions you may still have about California Health and Safety Code 11365, about being present while controlled substances are used, or to discuss your case confidentially with our team of experienced California criminal defense attorneys, give us a call at (310) 943-1171. Our lawyers in Glendale, Los Angeles County, CA, are highly dedicated to serving the needs of our clients.
KAASS LAW is authorized to practice law in California. The above content is intended for California residents only. This content provides only general information which may or may not reflect current legal developments. KAASS LAW expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any of the contents of this website. The above content DOES NOT create an attorney-client relationship. KAASS LAW does not represent you unless you have expressly retained KAASS LAW in person at the KAASS LAW office. KAASS LAW helps clients in: Los Angeles, Burbank, Hollywood, Glendale, Van Nuys, North Hollywood, Studio City, Highland Park, Eagle Rock, Sunland, Tujunga, Sylmar, San Bernardino, La Crescenta, La Canada, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, Brentwood. Pacoima, Montebello, Commerce, Alhambra, Downey, Bell, Maywood, Walnut Park, Vernon, Lynwood, Echo Park, Silverlake, Mission Hills, Northridge, Woodland Hills, Encino, Canoga Park, North Hills, Porter Ranch, Chatsworth, Reseda.
Related Articles
View All Posts
E-bikes are gaining popularity across California, offering an efficient and eco-friendly way to get around. But with the rise in usage, the number of e-bike injury incidents involving both riders and pedestrians has also grown. If you’ve been injured while riding an e-bike—or struck by one—you need to take swift action to protect your health and your legal rights. Here's what to do immediately after an injury accident in California
Step 1: Get Medical Attention for Your E-Bike Injury
Your health should always come first. After an e-bike injury, call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room, even if you feel okay. Some injuries, such as concussions or internal bleeding, may not show immediate symptoms.
Seeing a doctor promptly not only protects your health but also creates a medical record that can be critical if you decide to pursue a legal claim.
Step 2: Report the E-Bike Injury to the Police
Call local law enforcement to report the accident. In California, any collision involving injury or property damage must be documented. The responding officer will create an official police report.
Be clear and honest when giving your statement. Make sure you ask how to obtain a copy of the report. It will serve as important evidence in your case.
Step 3: Preserve Evidence—Don’t Disturb the Scene
In any e-bike injury case, preserving the accident scene is critical. If you are physically able, avoid moving the e-bike, other vehicles, or debris until authorities arrive. This helps investigators document the scene accurately.
Take photographs or videos of:
- Damaged e-bikes or vehicles
- Skid marks and debris
- Traffic signs or signals
- Visible injuries
- Your location relative to the road or sidewalk
If you're unable to take photos yourself, ask a witness or bystander to help. Never clean up or move items until the scene is documented.
Step 4: Collect Witness Statements After an E-Bike Injury
Witnesses can play a key role in verifying your version of events. If anyone saw the crash, ask them for:
- Full name
- Contact information
- A brief statement of what they saw
Eyewitness accounts are especially helpful in e-bike injury cases involving disputes over right of way, sidewalk use, or rider negligence.
Step 5: Document Your Injuries and Financial Losses
Keep records of everything related to your e-bike injury, including:
- Photos of injuries
- Doctor’s notes
- Prescriptions
- Physical therapy sessions
- Time missed from work
- Property damage (e.g., broken phones, cracked helmets, damaged e-bike)
Hold on to all bills, receipts, and repair estimates. This documentation will help build your case and support your claim for compensation.
Step 6: Don’t Speak to Insurers Without Legal Help
After an e-bike injury, insurance companies may contact you for a statement. Don’t provide one without first consulting a lawyer. Insurers often try to minimize payouts or shift blame.
At KAASS LAW, we deal with insurance adjusters on your behalf. We make sure your rights are protected and help you pursue fair compensation.
Step 7: Understand Liability in an E-Bike Injury Case
Determining fault is key in any e-bike injury case. Liability may fall on:
- A negligent e-bike rider
- A driver who hit a rider
- The city has hazardous road conditions
- An e-bike manufacturer is experiencing equipment failure
A personal injury attorney can help investigate the cause, gather evidence, and identify all responsible parties.
Common Causes of E-Bike Injury in California
Here are the common causes of e-bike injury for both riders and pedestrians:
- Reckless or speeding riders
- Riding on sidewalks or pedestrian paths
- Distracted riding or driving
- Mechanical failures (brakes, tires, batteries)
- Dooring accidents from parked vehicles
- Failure to yield at crosswalks or stop signs
If negligence was involved, you may be eligible for compensation for your injuries and damages.
Know Your Rights After
California law provides legal options for victims of injury accidents. Whether you're a rider or a pedestrian, you have the right to seek damages if someone else was at fault.
Visit our Personal Injury and Bicycle Accident Lawyer pages to learn more about your rights and how KAASS LAW can help.
When to Contact an Attorney
Don't wait to speak with a qualified attorney if you’ve suffered an injury in California. At KAASS LAW, we assist victims in gathering evidence, filing claims, and securing the compensation they deserve.
We offer free consultations and work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case.
E-Bike Safety Resources
Visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to learn more about e-bike safety, traffic laws, and accident prevention. This reputable resource offers valuable guidance for both riders and motorists.
Call KAASS LAW Today for Help With Your E-Bike Injury Case
If you or a loved one has been involved in an e-bike injury accident—whether as a rider or a pedestrian—you don’t have to face the aftermath alone. The legal team at KAASS LAW is here to help you understand your rights, gather critical evidence, and pursue the compensation you deserve.
Our experienced California personal injury attorneys have successfully represented clients in a wide range of transportation-related accident cases. We are committed to holding negligent parties accountable and helping you get the justice you need to move forward. Call us today at (310) 943-1171 or visit kaass.com to schedule your consultation.
What Are California's Clean Car Rules?
Clean Car rules refer to California's vehicle emission standards aimed at reducing air pollution and greenhouse gases. These rules come from the California Air Resources Board (CARB). They require automakers to cut tailpipe emissions and produce zero-emission vehicles like electric or hydrogen-powered cars.
California's program is stricter than federal rules. Over a dozen other states have adopted these standards under Section 177 of the Clean Air Act.
Legal Challenge to Clean Car Standards Gains Traction
Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lawsuit against California’s Clean Car rules to move forward. This case was brought by Republican-led states and industry groups. They claim that California's authority to set its own emission rules is unconstitutional.
The main argument revolves around the federal Clean Air Act. It allows California to request a waiver to impose stricter standards. The plaintiffs argue that these waivers create confusion and impose unfair burdens on car manufacturers. Automakers must then meet both federal and California standards.
Supreme Court Declines to Block the Case
The Supreme Court did not rule on the lawsuit’s outcome. Instead, it simply allowed the case to continue in lower courts. This reverses earlier decisions that blocked the case on jurisdictional grounds.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has promised to defend the rules. Environmental groups also support the Clean Car program, citing public health and climate benefits.
What This Means for Automakers and Consumers
If the challenge succeeds, California might lose its power to enforce stricter emissions rules. Automakers would likely reduce investments in zero-emission vehicles for the California market.
Consumers could see fewer Clean Car options and increased vehicle emissions. If California wins, the state could continue shaping national clean vehicle policy and technology.
Environmental and Health Impacts
Clean Car standards are about more than climate change. They address serious public health concerns. Vehicle emissions worsen smog and trigger asthma and heart conditions, especially in cities.
California suffers from some of the worst air pollution in the U.S. Areas like Los Angeles and the Central Valley are most affected. Clean Car rules aim to reduce the harm caused by millions of vehicles.
To learn more about vehicle pollution and public health, visit the Environmental Defense Fund.
Legal Battle Over State vs. Federal Power
This lawsuit raises big questions about federalism. Should California be able to set stricter rules than the federal government?
The Clean Air Act gives California the right to apply for waivers. That’s because the state has struggled with air pollution for decades.
Opponents argue these waivers give California too much control over national markets. Supporters say they drive innovation and protect public health.
The Trump administration revoked California’s waiver. President Biden later restored it. The back-and-forth has led to legal uncertainty.
Clean Car Standards Drive the Electric Vehicle Future
No matter how this case ends, the shift toward electric vehicles (EVs) is underway. Automakers like Tesla, Ford, and GM are heavily investing in EVs.
Clean Car rules helped build charging infrastructure and encouraged EV adoption. Weakening these rules might slow progress. But market forces and climate goals will likely keep the EV transition moving forward.
KAASS LAW’s Legal Insight
At KAASS LAW, we closely track cases like the Clean Car challenge. Environmental laws affect businesses, consumers, and government entities alike. Our attorneys are ready to help you understand and respond to these legal changes.
Visit our Business Law page to learn how we assist clients with compliance and litigation. We also handle Lawsuits and Litigation in various sectors, including environmental matters.
What Happens Next?
The case returns to lower courts for full litigation. Both sides will present their arguments. A final decision may take years.
Until then, Clean Car standards remain active. Automakers, regulators, and environmental groups will be watching closely. The ruling could reshape national clean air policy.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s action allows a high-stakes lawsuit against California’s Clean Car rules to move forward. The outcome will affect state powers, public health, and the auto industry.
Whether you’re a business, consumer, or policymaker, the decisions made in this case could impact you. Contact KAASS LAW to learn how we can help you navigate these evolving legal landscapes.
California positioned itself as a leader in reproductive rights by passing legislation that would expand IVF access through mandated insurance coverage. However, a recent amendment to the law has delayed its implementation from 2025 to 2026. This decision has left many prospective parents feeling abandoned, financially overwhelmed, and unsure of their next steps.
At KAASS LAW, we help individuals and couples navigate the complex legal and insurance systems tied to fertility treatments. In this post, we examine what California’s delayed IVF law means and what options remain available for those affected.
IVF Access Law: What California Promised
The law aimed to increase IVF access by requiring most health insurance plans in California to cover in vitro fertilization. Governor Gavin Newsom signed the law in October 2023, with the original start date set for January 1, 2025.
Specifically, the law:
- Defined infertility as a disease
- Required insurance providers to cover diagnosis and treatment, including IVF
- Applied to both employer-sponsored and individual health plans
By removing cost barriers, the state hoped to give more people the chance to build families through assisted reproductive technologies. However, legislators have now pushed the effective date to January 1, 2026.
IVF Access Delay: Real-World Consequences
This delay affects more than just policy—it impacts lives. IVF success rates often depend on timing. A one-year wait can lower success rates, especially for individuals over 35 or those with medical conditions.
Here’s what the delay means for patients:
- Insurance companies are not legally required to provide IVF coverage until 2026
- Individuals must continue paying out-of-pocket or rely on plans that offer voluntary benefits
- Delayed access may force some patients to postpone or abandon fertility plans entirely
People now face added stress, high treatment costs, and fewer alternatives. While the law’s delay may serve administrative needs, it introduces serious emotional and financial challenges for families.
If you’ve been denied fertility-related benefits or misled by your insurer, KAASS LAW can help you understand your rights. Visit our insurance claim disputes page for support.
Why Lawmakers Delayed IVF Access
California lawmakers claimed that insurers and state regulators needed more time to implement the IVF mandate. Insurance companies argued that they required time to update policies, calculate cost impacts, and train staff.
Supporters of the delay believe that a smoother rollout will ultimately help everyone. But many reproductive health advocates disagree. They argue that the delay prioritizes bureaucracy over people who have waited long enough.
Fertility treatment is not a luxury—it is a medical necessity for thousands. Lawmakers must balance administrative readiness with real human needs.
To read more about the recent delay, visit this Los Angeles Times article
Understanding the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights
California typically leads the way in protecting reproductive rights. While states like Alabama and Tennessee restrict IVF and other treatments, California’s legislation represents progress. However, delays like this reveal gaps between legal promises and practical realities.
Patients still lack guaranteed access to IVF, even though the law exists. Until full implementation occurs, patients must rely on employer benefits, personal savings, or outside funding sources.
At KAASS LAW, we support clients facing legal and insurance hurdles related to healthcare. If your insurance policy misrepresents its fertility benefits or denies a valid claim, we’re ready to act. Explore our healthcare law services for more information.
What You Can Do While Waiting for Coverage
Even though the law won’t take effect until 2026, there are still actions you can take right now to protect your family-building journey:
1. Check your current coverage
Review your plan’s benefits and exclusions. Some employer-sponsored plans may offer IVF coverage voluntarily.
2. Ask your HR department or broker
Employers can modify group health plans at any time. If you’re part of a large organization, collective requests for fertility coverage may influence change.
3. Apply for fertility grants
Several nonprofits provide financial assistance for IVF. Clinics may also offer payment plans, refunds for unsuccessful cycles, or package pricing.
4. Document insurance interactions
Save emails, letters, and notes from calls with insurance reps. If your benefits are misrepresented or claims are wrongly denied, legal action may be possible.
5. Contact a fertility law attorney
You don’t need to navigate this alone. Attorneys experienced in insurance and healthcare law, like the team at KAASS LAW, can evaluate your situation and suggest the best next steps.
KAASS LAW Supports IVF Patients and Families
Fertility issues can be deeply personal and legally complex. The delayed IVF access law adds another layer of difficulty to an already overwhelming process. Our attorneys work with clients to resolve disputes involving:
- Denied insurance claims for IVF or other reproductive procedures
- Failure to disclose policy limits or exclusions
- Misleading marketing materials related to fertility coverage
- Delays or denials based on age, gender, or medical history
We take a proactive approach to insurance disputes. Whether you need help appealing a denial or filing a legal complaint, KAASS LAW stands by your side throughout the process.
IVF Access Can’t Wait
Delaying IVF access might serve short-term policy goals, but it harms real people today. Fertility doesn’t pause for bureaucratic processes, and neither should your ability to receive care. California made a bold promise by passing this law. Now, the state must ensure its timely and effective implementation.
In the meantime, patients deserve accurate information, strong legal protections, and affordable options. At KAASS LAW, we are committed to helping families overcome the legal and financial barriers that stand between them and their dreams of parenthood.
If you believe your rights have been violated or your insurer acted in bad faith, contact us today. Let’s work together to protect your future.
