California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS)

PublishedNovember 18, 2020
California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (CLETS)

What is CLETS?

California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System

Law enforcement and criminal justice agencies use CLETS, a computer network, to access a person’s criminal history, record, and driving information. Additionally, it helps track and verify vital details during investigations. Moreover, the FBI, DMV, and other government agencies maintain and update this database. California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System information is highly sensitive; therefore, only authorized personnel have access to it. Additionally, the database connects law enforcement agencies to:

  • The International Justice and Public Safety Network database,
  • The Criminal Justice Information Services,
  • The National Crime Information Center and
  • DMV Records.

These networks allow for all law enforcement agencies to have a way to communicate. Most police vehicles are equipped with a mobile data terminal that connects them to the CLETS network from the car.

What Is a CLETS Order?

If you have heard of a CLETS Order, you might be referring to different types of restraining orders. They have this name because the CLETS database enters them. A California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System Order can include anything from:

  • Civil Harassment restraining orders
  • Elder abuse or dependent adult restraining orders
  • Domestic Violence restraining orders
  • Workplace violence restraining orders.

Can There Be Misuse of CLETS?

Given the amount of data stored in CLETS, it is necessary to set limitations on when you can access certain information. Instances of misusing CLETS can include:

  1. Using the system for personal reasons instead of official business is prohibited.
  2. Looking up high profile people like celebrities and government officials.
  3. Abusing the system by trying to access family or friend information.

Abuse of CLETS violates Penal Codes 11141-11143 and 13302-13304, making it a crime to misuse state and local summary criminal history. Felony penalties may apply under Government Code 6200. The DOJ will investigate misuse, and the California Attorney General will review the case.

Potential Consequences of Misuse of CLETS

Violations involving access to the CLETS system are taken very seriously at both the state and federal level. Any attempt to illegally access or use the data may result in criminal penalties. If a law enforcement officer uses the system to obtain information about someone without a legitimate reason, it could be considered a dereliction of duty. Even one-time personal use of CLETS may result in:

  • criminal prosecution
  • dismissal
  • fines
  • imprisonment

How to Prove Innocence?

However, if you are accused of illegally accessing the CLETS system or the CORI database, there are a number of defenses available. One common line of defense is to claim that the access was made in error. Or that it was part of a legitimate investigation. An attorney may be able to prove a lack of malice if the employee obtained the information as part of a job assignment. It is also possible to challenge the legality of the investigation itself. Especially if there were procedural violations. Such as:

  • illegal search
  • pressure from superiors

In such cases, the lawyer will help develop a defense strategy based on the facts and the admissibility of the evidence. In addition, CLETS and CORI training is recommended for all law enforcement officers to prevent such allegations. This helps ensure compliance with the law. It also protects employees from potential legal consequences. If you are confronted with allegations of illegal use of CLETS or CORI, it is important to seek legal advice quickly.

Legal Aspects and The Importance of Legal Protection

Misuse of CLETS or CORI can have serious professional and personal consequences. For example, a conviction may remain on your record. This can negatively affect future employment opportunities. Especially in law enforcement or other government agencies. It may also result in:

  • Loss of professional license
  • Demotion
  • Prohibition from working in certain areas

This is especially true for employees with security clearances. The employer may consider even the suspicion of a violation as grounds for termination. Therefore, at the first sign of an investigation, it is necessary to contact an attorney immediately.


A qualified attorney will not only help you build the right defense strategy, but will also help ensure that all of your rights are respected. KAASS LAW has extensive experience and is ready to fight for your reputation and your freedom. Do not underestimate the seriousness of these charges. Timely legal assistance can dramatically change the course of a case.

Related Databases:

What is CORI?

Criminal Offender Record Information - CORI

CORI information can also be found through CLETS. CORI is defined in Penal Code 11075 as a database of compiled records and data that allow law enforcement officers to identify criminal offenders. Contains CORI  information like:

  • Prior arrest history
  • Pretrial proceedings
  • Any prior criminal information, including:
    • Prior sentences
    • Prior incarcerations
    • Status of parole or probation
  • Social Security Numbers
  • Date of Birth
  • Rehabilitation program notifications

The same penalties apply to the misuse of CORI; individuals cannot use it for personal reasons. The DOJ and California Attorney General will also investigate misuse. Moreover, they will pursue appropriate legal action if needed. KAASS LAW can assist you if you face charges related to the misuse of CLETS or CORI.

Related Articles

View All Posts
What to Do After an E-Bike Injury in California

E-bikes are gaining popularity across California, offering an efficient and eco-friendly way to get around. But with the rise in usage, the number of e-bike injury incidents involving both riders and pedestrians has also grown. If you’ve been injured while riding an e-bike—or struck by one—you need to take swift action to protect your health and your legal rights. Here's what to do immediately after an injury accident in California

Step 1: Get Medical Attention for Your E-Bike Injury

Your health should always come first. After an e-bike injury, call 911 or go to the nearest emergency room, even if you feel okay. Some injuries, such as concussions or internal bleeding, may not show immediate symptoms.

Seeing a doctor promptly not only protects your health but also creates a medical record that can be critical if you decide to pursue a legal claim.

Step 2: Report the E-Bike Injury to the Police

Call local law enforcement to report the accident. In California, any collision involving injury or property damage must be documented. The responding officer will create an official police report.

Be clear and honest when giving your statement. Make sure you ask how to obtain a copy of the report. It will serve as important evidence in your case.

Step 3: Preserve Evidence—Don’t Disturb the Scene

In any e-bike injury case, preserving the accident scene is critical. If you are physically able, avoid moving the e-bike, other vehicles, or debris until authorities arrive. This helps investigators document the scene accurately.

Take photographs or videos of:

  • Damaged e-bikes or vehicles
  • Skid marks and debris
  • Traffic signs or signals
  • Visible injuries
  • Your location relative to the road or sidewalk

If you're unable to take photos yourself, ask a witness or bystander to help. Never clean up or move items until the scene is documented.

Step 4: Collect Witness Statements After an E-Bike Injury

Witnesses can play a key role in verifying your version of events. If anyone saw the crash, ask them for:

  • Full name
  • Contact information
  • A brief statement of what they saw

Eyewitness accounts are especially helpful in e-bike injury cases involving disputes over right of way, sidewalk use, or rider negligence.

Step 5: Document Your Injuries and Financial Losses

Keep records of everything related to your e-bike injury, including:

  • Photos of injuries
  • Doctor’s notes
  • Prescriptions
  • Physical therapy sessions
  • Time missed from work
  • Property damage (e.g., broken phones, cracked helmets, damaged e-bike)

Hold on to all bills, receipts, and repair estimates. This documentation will help build your case and support your claim for compensation.

Step 6: Don’t Speak to Insurers Without Legal Help

After an e-bike injury, insurance companies may contact you for a statement. Don’t provide one without first consulting a lawyer. Insurers often try to minimize payouts or shift blame.

At KAASS LAW, we deal with insurance adjusters on your behalf. We make sure your rights are protected and help you pursue fair compensation.

Step 7: Understand Liability in an E-Bike Injury Case

Determining fault is key in any e-bike injury case. Liability may fall on:

  • A negligent e-bike rider
  • A driver who hit a rider
  • The city has hazardous road conditions
  • An e-bike manufacturer is experiencing equipment failure

A personal injury attorney can help investigate the cause, gather evidence, and identify all responsible parties.

Common Causes of E-Bike Injury in California

Here are the common causes of e-bike injury for both riders and pedestrians:

  • Reckless or speeding riders
  • Riding on sidewalks or pedestrian paths
  • Distracted riding or driving
  • Mechanical failures (brakes, tires, batteries)
  • Dooring accidents from parked vehicles
  • Failure to yield at crosswalks or stop signs

If negligence was involved, you may be eligible for compensation for your injuries and damages.

Know Your Rights After

California law provides legal options for victims of injury accidents. Whether you're a rider or a pedestrian, you have the right to seek damages if someone else was at fault.

Visit our Personal Injury and Bicycle Accident Lawyer pages to learn more about your rights and how KAASS LAW can help.

When to Contact an Attorney

Don't wait to speak with a qualified attorney if you’ve suffered an injury in California. At KAASS LAW, we assist victims in gathering evidence, filing claims, and securing the compensation they deserve.

We offer free consultations and work on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we win your case.

E-Bike Safety Resources

Visit the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to learn more about e-bike safety, traffic laws, and accident prevention. This reputable resource offers valuable guidance for both riders and motorists.

Call KAASS LAW Today for Help With Your E-Bike Injury Case

If you or a loved one has been involved in an e-bike injury accident—whether as a rider or a pedestrian—you don’t have to face the aftermath alone. The legal team at KAASS LAW is here to help you understand your rights, gather critical evidence, and pursue the compensation you deserve.

Our experienced California personal injury attorneys have successfully represented clients in a wide range of transportation-related accident cases. We are committed to holding negligent parties accountable and helping you get the justice you need to move forward. Call us today at (310) 943-1171 or visit kaass.com to schedule your consultation.

Supreme Court Revives Challenge to Clean Car Rules

What Are California's Clean Car Rules?

Clean Car rules refer to California's vehicle emission standards aimed at reducing air pollution and greenhouse gases. These rules come from the California Air Resources Board (CARB). They require automakers to cut tailpipe emissions and produce zero-emission vehicles like electric or hydrogen-powered cars.

California's program is stricter than federal rules. Over a dozen other states have adopted these standards under Section 177 of the Clean Air Act.

Legal Challenge to Clean Car Standards Gains Traction

Recently, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed a lawsuit against California’s Clean Car rules to move forward. This case was brought by Republican-led states and industry groups. They claim that California's authority to set its own emission rules is unconstitutional.

The main argument revolves around the federal Clean Air Act. It allows California to request a waiver to impose stricter standards. The plaintiffs argue that these waivers create confusion and impose unfair burdens on car manufacturers. Automakers must then meet both federal and California standards.

Supreme Court Declines to Block the Case

The Supreme Court did not rule on the lawsuit’s outcome. Instead, it simply allowed the case to continue in lower courts. This reverses earlier decisions that blocked the case on jurisdictional grounds.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta has promised to defend the rules. Environmental groups also support the Clean Car program, citing public health and climate benefits.

What This Means for Automakers and Consumers

If the challenge succeeds, California might lose its power to enforce stricter emissions rules. Automakers would likely reduce investments in zero-emission vehicles for the California market.

Consumers could see fewer Clean Car options and increased vehicle emissions. If California wins, the state could continue shaping national clean vehicle policy and technology.

Environmental and Health Impacts

Clean Car standards are about more than climate change. They address serious public health concerns. Vehicle emissions worsen smog and trigger asthma and heart conditions, especially in cities.

California suffers from some of the worst air pollution in the U.S. Areas like Los Angeles and the Central Valley are most affected. Clean Car rules aim to reduce the harm caused by millions of vehicles.

To learn more about vehicle pollution and public health, visit the Environmental Defense Fund.

Legal Battle Over State vs. Federal Power

This lawsuit raises big questions about federalism. Should California be able to set stricter rules than the federal government?

The Clean Air Act gives California the right to apply for waivers. That’s because the state has struggled with air pollution for decades.

Opponents argue these waivers give California too much control over national markets. Supporters say they drive innovation and protect public health.

The Trump administration revoked California’s waiver. President Biden later restored it. The back-and-forth has led to legal uncertainty.

Clean Car Standards Drive the Electric Vehicle Future

No matter how this case ends, the shift toward electric vehicles (EVs) is underway. Automakers like Tesla, Ford, and GM are heavily investing in EVs.

Clean Car rules helped build charging infrastructure and encouraged EV adoption. Weakening these rules might slow progress. But market forces and climate goals will likely keep the EV transition moving forward.

KAASS LAW’s Legal Insight

At KAASS LAW, we closely track cases like the Clean Car challenge. Environmental laws affect businesses, consumers, and government entities alike. Our attorneys are ready to help you understand and respond to these legal changes.

Visit our Business Law page to learn how we assist clients with compliance and litigation. We also handle Lawsuits and Litigation in various sectors, including environmental matters.

What Happens Next?

The case returns to lower courts for full litigation. Both sides will present their arguments. A final decision may take years.

Until then, Clean Car standards remain active. Automakers, regulators, and environmental groups will be watching closely. The ruling could reshape national clean air policy.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s action allows a high-stakes lawsuit against California’s Clean Car rules to move forward. The outcome will affect state powers, public health, and the auto industry.

Whether you’re a business, consumer, or policymaker, the decisions made in this case could impact you. Contact KAASS LAW to learn how we can help you navigate these evolving legal landscapes.

California’s IVF Access Law May Be Delayed

California positioned itself as a leader in reproductive rights by passing legislation that would expand IVF access through mandated insurance coverage. However, a recent amendment to the law has delayed its implementation from 2025 to 2026. This decision has left many prospective parents feeling abandoned, financially overwhelmed, and unsure of their next steps.

At KAASS LAW, we help individuals and couples navigate the complex legal and insurance systems tied to fertility treatments. In this post, we examine what California’s delayed IVF law means and what options remain available for those affected.

IVF Access Law: What California Promised

The law aimed to increase IVF access by requiring most health insurance plans in California to cover in vitro fertilization. Governor Gavin Newsom signed the law in October 2023, with the original start date set for January 1, 2025.

Specifically, the law:

  • Defined infertility as a disease
  • Required insurance providers to cover diagnosis and treatment, including IVF
  • Applied to both employer-sponsored and individual health plans

By removing cost barriers, the state hoped to give more people the chance to build families through assisted reproductive technologies. However, legislators have now pushed the effective date to January 1, 2026.

IVF Access Delay: Real-World Consequences

This delay affects more than just policy—it impacts lives. IVF success rates often depend on timing. A one-year wait can lower success rates, especially for individuals over 35 or those with medical conditions.

Here’s what the delay means for patients:

  • Insurance companies are not legally required to provide IVF coverage until 2026
  • Individuals must continue paying out-of-pocket or rely on plans that offer voluntary benefits
  • Delayed access may force some patients to postpone or abandon fertility plans entirely

People now face added stress, high treatment costs, and fewer alternatives. While the law’s delay may serve administrative needs, it introduces serious emotional and financial challenges for families.

If you’ve been denied fertility-related benefits or misled by your insurer, KAASS LAW can help you understand your rights. Visit our insurance claim disputes page for support.

Why Lawmakers Delayed IVF Access

California lawmakers claimed that insurers and state regulators needed more time to implement the IVF mandate. Insurance companies argued that they required time to update policies, calculate cost impacts, and train staff.

Supporters of the delay believe that a smoother rollout will ultimately help everyone. But many reproductive health advocates disagree. They argue that the delay prioritizes bureaucracy over people who have waited long enough.

Fertility treatment is not a luxury—it is a medical necessity for thousands. Lawmakers must balance administrative readiness with real human needs.

To read more about the recent delay, visit this Los Angeles Times article

Understanding the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights

California typically leads the way in protecting reproductive rights. While states like Alabama and Tennessee restrict IVF and other treatments, California’s legislation represents progress. However, delays like this reveal gaps between legal promises and practical realities.

Patients still lack guaranteed access to IVF, even though the law exists. Until full implementation occurs, patients must rely on employer benefits, personal savings, or outside funding sources.

At KAASS LAW, we support clients facing legal and insurance hurdles related to healthcare. If your insurance policy misrepresents its fertility benefits or denies a valid claim, we’re ready to act. Explore our healthcare law services for more information.

What You Can Do While Waiting for Coverage

Even though the law won’t take effect until 2026, there are still actions you can take right now to protect your family-building journey:

1. Check your current coverage

Review your plan’s benefits and exclusions. Some employer-sponsored plans may offer IVF coverage voluntarily.

2. Ask your HR department or broker

Employers can modify group health plans at any time. If you’re part of a large organization, collective requests for fertility coverage may influence change.

3. Apply for fertility grants

Several nonprofits provide financial assistance for IVF. Clinics may also offer payment plans, refunds for unsuccessful cycles, or package pricing.

4. Document insurance interactions

Save emails, letters, and notes from calls with insurance reps. If your benefits are misrepresented or claims are wrongly denied, legal action may be possible.

5. Contact a fertility law attorney

You don’t need to navigate this alone. Attorneys experienced in insurance and healthcare law, like the team at KAASS LAW, can evaluate your situation and suggest the best next steps.


KAASS LAW Supports IVF Patients and Families

Fertility issues can be deeply personal and legally complex. The delayed IVF access law adds another layer of difficulty to an already overwhelming process. Our attorneys work with clients to resolve disputes involving:

  • Denied insurance claims for IVF or other reproductive procedures
  • Failure to disclose policy limits or exclusions
  • Misleading marketing materials related to fertility coverage
  • Delays or denials based on age, gender, or medical history

We take a proactive approach to insurance disputes. Whether you need help appealing a denial or filing a legal complaint, KAASS LAW stands by your side throughout the process.

IVF Access Can’t Wait

Delaying IVF access might serve short-term policy goals, but it harms real people today. Fertility doesn’t pause for bureaucratic processes, and neither should your ability to receive care. California made a bold promise by passing this law. Now, the state must ensure its timely and effective implementation.

In the meantime, patients deserve accurate information, strong legal protections, and affordable options. At KAASS LAW, we are committed to helping families overcome the legal and financial barriers that stand between them and their dreams of parenthood.

If you believe your rights have been violated or your insurer acted in bad faith, contact us today. Let’s work together to protect your future.